Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dustin Wüest

dblp:02/9360 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 7 · 7 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering
0.422015
FLEXISKETCH TEAM: Collaborative Sketching and Notation Creation on the Fly · ICSE (2) 2015
Semi-automatic generation of metamodels from model sketches · ASE 2013
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering
metamodeling
0.212013
Semi-automatic generation of metamodels from model sketches · ASE 2013
Collaborative and social computing › collaborative design
collaborative design tools
0.112015
FLEXISKETCH TEAM: Collaborative Sketching and Notation Creation on the Fly · ICSE (2) 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interactive annotation · 0.2automated model analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Combining Monitoring and Autonomous Feedback Requests to Elicit Actionable Knowledge of System Use
Dustin Wüest, Farnaz Fotrousi, Samuel Fricker
REFSQ1
2019 FlexiSketch: a lightweight sketching and metamodeling approach for end-users
Dustin Wüest, Norbert Seyff, Martin Glinz
Softw. Syst. Model.1
2015 FLEXISKETCH TEAM: Collaborative Sketching and Notation Creation on the Fly
abstract
When software engineers collaborate, they frequently use whiteboards or paper for sketching diagrams. This is fast and flexible, but the resulting diagrams cannot be interpreted by software modeling tools. We present FLEXISKETCH TEAM, a tool solution consisting of a significantly extended version of our previous, single-user FLEXISKETCH tool for Android devices and a new desktop tool. Our solution for collaborative, model-based sketching of free-form diagrams allows users to define and re-use diagramming notations on the fly. Several users can work simultaneously on the same model sketch with multiple tablets. The desktop tool provides a shared view of the drawing canvas which can be projected onto an electronic whiteboard. Preliminary results from an exploratory study show that our tool motivates meeting participants to actively take part in sketching as well as defining ad-hoc notations.
Dustin Wüest, Norbert Seyff, Martin Glinz
ICSE (2)1
2015 Sketching and notation creation with FlexiSketch Team: Evaluating a new means for collaborative requirements elicitation
abstract
Whiteboards and paper allow for any kind of notations and are easy to use. Requirements engineers love to use them in creative requirements elicitation and design sessions. However, the resulting diagram sketches cannot be interpreted by software modeling tools. We have developed FlexiSketch as an alternative to whiteboards in previous work. It is a mobile tool for model-based sketching of free-form diagrams that allows the definition and re-use of diagramming notations on the fly. The latest version of the tool, called FlexiSketch Team, supports collaboration with multiple tablets and an electronic whiteboard, such that several users can work simultaneously on the same model sketch. In this paper we present an exploratory study about how novice and experienced engineers sketch and define ad-hoc notations collaboratively in early requirements elicitation sessions when supported by our tool. Results show that participants incrementally build notations by defining language constructs the first time they use them. Participants considered the option to re-use defined constructs to be a big motivational factor for providing type definitions. They found our approach useful for longer sketching sessions and situations where sketches are re-used later on.
Dustin Wüest, Norbert Seyff, Martin Glinz
RE1
2013 Semi-automatic generation of metamodels from model sketches
abstract
Traditionally, metamodeling is an upfront activity performed by experts for defining modeling languages. Modeling tools then typically restrict modelers to using only constructs defined in the metamodel. This is inappropriate when users want to sketch graphical models without any restrictions and only later assign meanings to the sketched elements. Upfront metamodeling also complicates the creation of domain-specific languages, as it requires experts with both domain and metamodeling expertise. In this paper we present a new approach that supports modelers in creating metamodels for diagrams they have sketched or are currently sketching. Metamodels are defined in a semi-automatic, interactive way by annotating diagram elements and automated model analysis. Our approach requires no metamodeling expertise and supports the co-evolution of models and meta-models.
Dustin Wüest, Norbert Seyff, Martin Glinz
ASE1
2012 Flexible, lightweight requirements modeling with Flexisketch
abstract
Early stage requirements models are often documented using paper and pencil-based approaches. In our current research, we are exploring lightweight modeling tools and approaches that could provide a beneficial alternative. We have developed the FlexiSketch tool prototype which combines support for free-form sketching with lightweight metamodeling capabilities. This creates the possibility for an automatic transcription of the documented information in later modeling stages. The tool is designed to be used on tablet devices.
Dustin Wüest, Norbert Seyff, Martin Glinz
RE1
2011 Flexible Sketch-Based Requirements Modeling
Dustin Wüest, Martin Glinz
REFSQ1