EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jean-Guillaume Piccinali
dblp:02/9592
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Visualization and visual analytics
interactive visualization |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Parallel Computational Steering for HPC Applications Using HDF5 Files in Distributed Shared Memory · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2012 |
Visualization and visual analytics
scientific visualization |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Parallel Computational Steering for HPC Applications Using HDF5 Files in Distributed Shared Memory · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2012 |
High-performance computing
computational steering |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Parallel Computational Steering for HPC Applications Using HDF5 Files in Distributed Shared Memory · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2012 |
High-performance computing › scientific visualization
in situ visualization and analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Parallel Computational Steering for HPC Applications Using HDF5 Files in Distributed Shared Memory · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2012 |
High-performance computing
parallel i/o |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Parallel Computational Steering for HPC Applications Using HDF5 Files in Distributed Shared Memory · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
distributed shared memory · 0.3MPI · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Large-Scale System Monitoring Experiences and RecommendationsabstractMonitoring of High Performance Computing (HPC) platforms is critical to successful operations, can provide insights into performance-impacting conditions, and can inform methodologies for improving science throughput. However, monitoring systems are not generally considered core capabilities in system requirements specifications nor in vendor development strategies. In this paper we present work performed at a number of large-scale HPC sites towards developing monitoring capabilities that fill current gaps in ease of problem identification and root cause discovery. We also present our collective views, based on the experiences presented, on needs and requirements for enabling development by vendors or users of effective sharable end-to-end monitoring capabilities. Ville Ahlgren, Stefan Andersson, Jim M. Brandt, Nicholas Cardo, Sudheer Chunduri, Jeremy Enos, Parks Fields, Ann C. Gentile, Richard A. Gerber, Michael Gienger, Joe Greenseid, Annette Greiner, Bilel Hadri, Dennis Hoppe, Urpo Kaila, Kaki Kelly, Mark Klein 0002, Alex Kristiansen, Stephen Leak, Mike Mason, Kevin T. Pedretti, Jean-Guillaume Piccinali, Jason Repik, Jim Rogers, Susanna Salminen, Michael T. Showerman, Cary Whitney, Jim Williams |
CLUSTER | 23 |
| 2018 | Towards a Mini-App for Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics at ExascaleabstractThe smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) technique is a purely Lagrangian method, used in numerical simulations of fluids in astrophysics and computational fluid dynamics, among many other fields. SPH simulations with detailed physics represent computationally-demanding calculations. The parallelization of SPH codes is not trivial due to the absence of a structured grid. Additionally, the performance of the SPH codes can be, in general, adversely impacted by several factors, such as multiple time-stepping, long-range interactions, and/or boundary conditions. This work presents insights into the current performance and functionalities of three SPH codes: SPHYNX, ChaNGa, and SPH-flow. These codes are the starting point of an interdisciplinary co-design project, SPH-EXA, for the development of an Exascale-ready SPH mini-app. To gain such insights, a rotating square patch test was implemented as a common test simulation for the three SPH codes and analyzed on two modern HPC systems. Furthermore, to stress the differences with the codes stemming from the astrophysics community (SPHYNX and ChaNGa), an additional test case, the Evrard collapse, has also been carried out. This work extrapolates the common basic SPH features in the three codes for the purpose of consolidating them into a pure-SPH, Exascale-ready, optimized, mini-app. Moreover, the outcome of this serves as direct feedback to the parent codes, to improve their performance and overall scalability. Danilo Guerrera, Rubén M. Cabezón, Jean-Guillaume Piccinali, Aurélien Cavelan, Florina M. Ciorba, David Imbert, Lucio Mayer, Darren S. Reed |
CLUSTER | 3 |
| 2012 | Parallel Computational Steering for HPC Applications Using HDF5 Files in Distributed Shared MemoryabstractInterfacing a GUI driven visualization/analysis package to an HPC application enables a supercomputer to be used as an interactive instrument. We achieve this by replacing the IO layer in the HDF5 library with a custom driver which transfers data in parallel between simulation and analysis. Our implementation using ParaView as the interface, allows a flexible combination of parallel simulation, concurrent parallel analysis, and GUI client, either on the same or separate machines. Each MPI job may use different core counts or hardware configurations, allowing fine tuning of the amount of resources dedicated to each part of the workload. By making use of a distributed shared memory file, one may read data from the simulation, modify it using ParaView pipelines, write it back, to be reused by the simulation (or vice versa). This allows not only simple parameter changes, but complete remeshing of grids, or operations involving regeneration of field values over the entire domain. To avoid the problem of manually customizing the GUI for each application that is to be steered, we make use of XML templates that describe outputs from the simulation (and inputs back to it) to automatically generate GUI controls for manipulation of the simulation. John Biddiscombe, Jérome Soumagne, Guillaume Oger, David Guibert, Jean-Guillaume Piccinali |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 5 |