Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Keld Bødker

dblp:03/1937 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
0000-0001-7938-0277ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 67% Requirements engineering and software design · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering › software engineering practice
design practice
0.011993
A Reappraisal of Structured Analysis: Design in an Organizational Context · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 1993
Empirical software engineering
developer studies
0.011993
A Reappraisal of Structured Analysis: Design in an Organizational Context · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 1993
Requirements engineering and software design › requirements analysis
structured analysis
0.011993
A Reappraisal of Structured Analysis: Design in an Organizational Context · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 1993

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

exploratory study · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Participatory Design at a Radio Station
Finn Kensing, Jesper Simonsen, Keld Bødker
Comput. Support. Cooperative Work.3
1998 MUST: A Method for Participatory Design
abstract
The article presents a conceptual framework and a coherent method for design in an organizational context within the participatory design tradition. The MUST method has been developed throughout 10 projects in Danish and American organizations, and it has recently been evaluated and adopted by 3 Danish organizations. The method is based on thorough participation with users and managers, and it combines the use of ethnographic techniques and intervention. The article describes the application area and perspective of the method, presents 6 general principles on which the method is based, and describes 5 main activities providing a stepwise decision-making process in the overall design process. Each of the main activities is illustrated by an example taken from our last project. The article concludes by summing up the main points.
Finn Kensing, Jesper Simonsen, Keld Bødker
Hum. Comput. Interact.3
1997 Designing for Cooperation at a Radio Station
Finn Kensing, Jesper Simonsen, Keld Bødker
ECSCW3
1993 A Reappraisal of Structured Analysis: Design in an Organizational Context
abstract
We review Structured Analysis as presented by Yourdon and DeMarco. First, we examine the implicit assumptions embodied in the method about the nature of organizations, work processes, and design. Following this we present the results of an exploratory study, conducted to find out how the method is applied in practice. This study reveals that while some of the tools of Structured Analysis—notably the data flow diagrams—are used and combined with other tools, the designers do not follow the analysis and design procedures prescribed by the method. Our findings suggest that there is a gap between the way systems development is portrayed in the normative technical literature and the way in which it is carried out.
Jorgen P. Bansler, Keld Bødker
ACM Trans. Inf. Syst.2