Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Alicja Pierzynska

dblp:03/2294 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › fault modeling
delay fault model
0.011997
Pitfalls in delay fault testing · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1997
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
delay fault testing
0.011997
Pitfalls in delay fault testing · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1997
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.011997
Pitfalls in delay fault testing · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

electrical-level simulation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Pitfalls in delay fault testing
abstract
In this paper, we examine delay models used in very large scale integration (VLSI) circuit testing. Our study is based on electrical-level simulation experiments. We present a comprehensive analysis of phenomena which significantly affect the actual delays but are not taken into account by the existing models used in testing. Because of these phenomena, for a given path in a circuit, tests commonly considered equivalent may result in different pass/fail decisions. Moreover, contrary to a common assumption, robust tests may fail to detect faults detectable by nonrobust tests. This may happen even in circuits in which all paths are robust testable. Our analysis questions the test quality offered by delay test procedures used so far.
Alicja Pierzynska, Slawomir Pilarski
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.1
1995 Non-Robust versus Robust
abstract
We show that a path delay under a non-robust test may be longer than under any robust test. Thus, for a given path, a non-robust test can detect a delay fault undetectable by robust tests. This can happen even in a circuit in which all paths are robust-testable.
Alicja Pierzynska, Slawomir Pilarski
ITC1
1993 BIST and Delay Fault Detection
abstract
We propose simple modifications to existing BIST schemes. These modifications significantly improve the path delay fault coverage. For example, a modified circular self-test path can detect a significant number of path delay faults within a reasonable test running time.>
Slawomir Pilarski, Alicja Pierzynska
ITC2
1992 Built-in self-test design for large embedded PLAs
abstract
Proposes a new easily testable PLA. In the design process the authors use a simple property of relatively prime numbers. The PLA can be efficiently integrated with random pattern techniques used for testing combinational circuits. In the proposed implementation, test pattern generation and test response compaction are performed by circular self-test path (circular BIST). Very high fault coverage can be achieved in a feasible testing time.>
Alicja Pierzynska, Slawomir Pilarski
VTS1