Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael T. Todd

dblp:03/2635 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 64% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 28% Learning theory · 8%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
cognitive modeling
0.112008
Learning to Use Working Memory in Partially Observable Environments through Dopaminergic Reinforcement · NIPS 2008
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
partially observable reinforcement learning
0.112008
Learning to Use Working Memory in Partially Observable Environments through Dopaminergic Reinforcement · NIPS 2008
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › memory architectures
working memory
0.112008
Learning to Use Working Memory in Partially Observable Environments through Dopaminergic Reinforcement · NIPS 2008
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning
0.012008
Learning to Use Working Memory in Partially Observable Environments through Dopaminergic Reinforcement · NIPS 2008
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
temporal difference learning
0.012008
Learning to Use Working Memory in Partially Observable Environments through Dopaminergic Reinforcement · NIPS 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

temporal difference learning · 0.1gating framework · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 The Successor Representation and Temporal Context
abstract
The successor representation was introduced into reinforcement learning by Dayan ( 1993 ) as a means of facilitating generalization between states with similar successors. Although reinforcement learning in general has been used extensively as a model of psychological and neural processes, the psychological validity of the successor representation has yet to be explored. An interesting possibility is that the successor representation can be used not only for reinforcement learning but for episodic learning as well. Our main contribution is to show that a variant of the temporal context model (TCM; Howard & Kahana, 2002 ), an influential model of episodic memory, can be understood as directly estimating the successor representation using the temporal difference learning algorithm (Sutton & Barto, 1998 ). This insight leads to a generalization of TCM and new experimental predictions. In addition to casting a new normative light on TCM, this equivalence suggests a previously unexplored point of contact between different learning systems.
Samuel Gershman, Christopher D. Moore, Michael T. Todd, Kenneth A. Norman, Per B. Sederberg
Neural Comput.3
2008 Learning to Use Working Memory in Partially Observable Environments through Dopaminergic Reinforcement
abstract
Working memory is a central topic of cognitive neuroscience because it is critical for solving real world problems in which information from multiple temporally distant sources must be combined to generate appropriate behavior. However, an often neglected fact is that learning to use working memory effectively is itself a difficult problem. The Gating" framework is a collection of psychological models that show how dopamine can train the basal ganglia and prefrontal cortex to form useful working memory representations in certain types of problems. We bring together gating with ideas from machine learning about using finite memory systems in more general problems. Thus we present a normative Gating model that learns, by online temporal difference methods, to use working memory to maximize discounted future rewards in general partially observable settings. The model successfully solves a benchmark working memory problem, and exhibits limitations similar to those observed in human experiments. Moreover, the model introduces a concise, normative definition of high level cognitive concepts such as working memory and cognitive control in terms of maximizing discounted future rewards."
Michael T. Todd, Yael Niv, Jonathan D. Cohen 0003
NIPS1