Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Markus Riester

dblp:03/2921 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0002-4759-8332ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics
0.212014
Cross-study validation for the assessment of prediction algorithms · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biostatistics › statistical bioinformatics
cross-study validation
0.212014
Cross-study validation for the assessment of prediction algorithms · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology
survival analysis
0.212014
Cross-study validation for the assessment of prediction algorithms · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › population genetics
pedigree reconstruction
0.112009
FRANz: reconstruction of wild multi-generation pedigrees · Bioinform. 2009
Bioinformatics and computational biology
population genetics
0.112009
FRANz: reconstruction of wild multi-generation pedigrees · Bioinform. 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survival analysis · 0.2cross-validation · 0.2c-index · 0.2microsatellite and SNP markers · 0.1markov chain monte carlo · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 An Evolutionary Approach for Identifying Driver Mutations in Colorectal Cancer
abstract
The traditional view of cancer as a genetic disease that can successfully be treated with drugs targeting mutant onco-proteins has motivated whole-genome sequencing efforts in many human cancer types. However, only a subset of mutations found within the genomic landscape of cancer is likely to provide a fitness advantage to the cell. Distinguishing such "driver" mutations from innocuous "passenger" events is critical for prioritizing the validation of candidate mutations in disease-relevant models. We design a novel statistical index, called the Hitchhiking Index, which reflects the probability that any observed candidate gene is a passenger alteration, given the frequency of alterations in a cross-sectional cancer sample set, and apply it to a mutational data set in colorectal cancer. Our methodology is based upon a population dynamics model of mutation accumulation and selection in colorectal tissue prior to cancer initiation as well as during tumorigenesis. This methodology can be used to aid in the prioritization of candidate mutations for functional validation and contributes to the process of drug discovery.
Jasmine Foo, Lin L. Liu, Kevin Leder, Markus Riester, Yoh Iwasa, Christoph Lengauer, Franziska Michor
PLoS Comput. Biol.4
2014 Cross-study validation for the assessment of prediction algorithms
abstract
MOTIVATION: Numerous competing algorithms for prediction in high-dimensional settings have been developed in the statistical and machine-learning literature. Learning algorithms and the prediction models they generate are typically evaluated on the basis of cross-validation error estimates in a few exemplary datasets. However, in most applications, the ultimate goal of prediction modeling is to provide accurate predictions for independent samples obtained in different settings. Cross-validation within exemplary datasets may not adequately reflect performance in the broader application context. METHODS: We develop and implement a systematic approach to 'cross-study validation', to replace or supplement conventional cross-validation when evaluating high-dimensional prediction models in independent datasets. We illustrate it via simulations and in a collection of eight estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer microarray gene-expression datasets, where the objective is predicting distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). We computed the C-index for all pairwise combinations of training and validation datasets. We evaluate several alternatives for summarizing the pairwise validation statistics, and compare these to conventional cross-validation. RESULTS: Our data-driven simulations and our application to survival prediction with eight breast cancer microarray datasets, suggest that standard cross-validation produces inflated discrimination accuracy for all algorithms considered, when compared to cross-study validation. Furthermore, the ranking of learning algorithms differs, suggesting that algorithms performing best in cross-validation may be suboptimal when evaluated through independent validation. AVAILABILITY: The survHD: Survival in High Dimensions package (http://www.bitbucket.org/lwaldron/survhd) will be made available through Bioconductor.
Christoph Bernau, Markus Riester, Anne-Laure Boulesteix, Giovanni Parmigiani, Curtis Huttenhower, Levi Waldron, Lorenzo Trippa
Bioinform.2
2010 A Differentiation-Based Phylogeny of Cancer Subtypes
abstract
Histopathological classification of human tumors relies in part on the degree of differentiation of the tumor sample. To date, there is no objective systematic method to categorize tumor subtypes by maturation. In this paper, we introduce a novel computational algorithm to rank tumor subtypes according to the dissimilarity of their gene expression from that of stem cells and fully differentiated tissue, and thereby construct a phylogenetic tree of cancer. We validate our methodology with expression data of leukemia, breast cancer and liposarcoma subtypes and then apply it to a broader group of sarcomas. This ranking of tumor subtypes resulting from the application of our methodology allows the identification of genes correlated with differentiation and may help to identify novel therapeutic targets. Our algorithm represents the first phylogeny-based tool to analyze the differentiation status of human tumors.
Markus Riester, Camille Stephan-Otto Attolini, Robert J. Downey, Samuel Singer, Franziska Michor
PLoS Comput. Biol.1
2009 FRANz: reconstruction of wild multi-generation pedigrees
abstract
SUMMARY: We present a software package for pedigree reconstruction in natural populations using co-dominant genomic markers such as microsatellites and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). If available, the algorithm makes use of prior information such as known relationships (sub-pedigrees) or the age and sex of individuals. Statistical confidence is estimated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. The accuracy of the algorithm is demonstrated for simulated data as well as an empirical dataset with known pedigree. The parentage inference is robust even in the presence of genotyping errors. AVAILABILITY: The C source code of FRANz can be obtained under the GPL from http://www.bioinf.uni-leipzig.de/Software/FRANz/.
Markus Riester, Peter F. Stadler, Konstantin Klemm
Bioinform.1