Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel T. Luan

dblp:03/3161 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Transport protocols and congestion control · 33% Network performance modeling · 33% Internet architecture and protocols · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet architecture and protocols › traffic management
bandwidth management
0.011988
Throughput analysis of a window-based flow control subject to bandwidth management · INFOCOM 1988
Network performance modeling › throughput analysis
goodput analysis
0.011988
Throughput analysis of a window-based flow control subject to bandwidth management · INFOCOM 1988
Transport protocols and congestion control › flow control
window flow control
0.011988
Throughput analysis of a window-based flow control subject to bandwidth management · INFOCOM 1988

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

analytical modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1990 Bandwidth Management: A Congestion Control Strategy for Broadband Packet Networks - Characterizing the Throughput-Burstiness Filter
Adrian E. Eckberg, Daniel T. Luan, David M. Lucantoni
Comput. Networks ISDN Syst.2
1988 Throughput analysis of a window-based flow control subject to bandwidth management
abstract
The authors analyze the performance of an end-to-end window-based flow control subject to bandwidth management. In particular, they model a high-level data-link-control-type layer-two protocol, e.g. LAPD, based on positive acknowledgements for correctly received frames. They explicitly model the effect of frame losses on the performance, which takes on a greater significance when some type of bandwidth management is used by the network. When a frame is lost, there are two major recovery mechanisms: REJECT and time-out. Both of them are explicitly incorporated into the analysis. The main performance measure considered is the goodput, i.e. the throughput of frames excluding retransmissions, that the customer can achieve. When the network is at a given level of congestion, it is shown that a customer can choose an appropriate window size to optimize the goodput subject to bandwidth management.>
Daniel T. Luan, David M. Lucantoni
INFOCOM1