Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel T. Luan
dblp:03/3161
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Transport protocols and congestion control · 33% Network performance modeling · 33% Internet architecture and protocols · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Internet architecture and protocols › traffic management
bandwidth management |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Throughput analysis of a window-based flow control subject to bandwidth management · INFOCOM 1988 |
Network performance modeling › throughput analysis
goodput analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Throughput analysis of a window-based flow control subject to bandwidth management · INFOCOM 1988 |
Transport protocols and congestion control › flow control
window flow control |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Throughput analysis of a window-based flow control subject to bandwidth management · INFOCOM 1988 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
analytical modeling · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | Bandwidth Management: A Congestion Control Strategy for Broadband Packet Networks - Characterizing the Throughput-Burstiness Filter
Adrian E. Eckberg, Daniel T. Luan, David M. Lucantoni |
Comput. Networks ISDN Syst. | 2 |
| 1988 | Throughput analysis of a window-based flow control subject to bandwidth managementabstractThe authors analyze the performance of an end-to-end window-based flow control subject to bandwidth management. In particular, they model a high-level data-link-control-type layer-two protocol, e.g. LAPD, based on positive acknowledgements for correctly received frames. They explicitly model the effect of frame losses on the performance, which takes on a greater significance when some type of bandwidth management is used by the network. When a frame is lost, there are two major recovery mechanisms: REJECT and time-out. Both of them are explicitly incorporated into the analysis. The main performance measure considered is the goodput, i.e. the throughput of frames excluding retransmissions, that the customer can achieve. When the network is at a given level of congestion, it is shown that a customer can choose an appropriate window size to optimize the goodput subject to bandwidth management.> Daniel T. Luan, David M. Lucantoni |
INFOCOM | 1 |