Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stephan Somogyi
dblp:03/3775
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0004-0692-2978ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Usable security · 77% Privacy and data protection · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Usable security
at-risk users |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Supporting the Digital Safety of At-Risk Users: Lessons Learned from 9+ Years of Research and Training · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2025 |
Privacy and data protection
vulnerable populations |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Supporting the Digital Safety of At-Risk Users: Lessons Learned from 9+ Years of Research and Training · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
framework development · 0.9design principles · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Supporting the Digital Safety of At-Risk Users: Lessons Learned from 9+ Years of Research and TrainingabstractCreating information technologies intended for broad use that allow everyone to participate safely online—which we refer to as inclusive digital safety —requires understanding and addressing the digital-safety needs of a diverse range of users who face elevated risk of technology-facilitated attacks or disproportionate harm from such attacks—i.e., at-risk users . This article draws from more than 9 years of our work at Google to understand and support the digital safety of at-risk users—including survivors of intimate partner abuse, people involved with political campaigns, content creators, youth, and more—in technology intended for broad use. Among our learnings is that designing for inclusive digital safety across widely varied user needs and dynamic contexts is a wicked problem with no “correct” solution. Given this, we describe frameworks and design principles we have developed to help make at-risk research findings practically applicable to technologies intended for broad use and lessons we have learned about communicating them to practitioners. Tara Matthews, Elie Bursztein, Patrick Gage Kelley, Lea Kissner, Andreas Kramm, Andrew Oplinger, Andreas Schou, Manya Sleeper, Stephan Somogyi, Dalila Szostak, Kurt Thomas, Anna Turner, Jill Palzkill Woelfer, Lawrence You, Izzie Zahorian, Sunny Consolvo |
ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. | 9 |