Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jin Yu 0001

dblp:03/5102-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
3D vision · 85% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 15%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Mathematical optimization · 91% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 9%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Computational photography and imaging · 35% Visualization and visual analytics · 35% Geometric modeling and processing · 30%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric estimation
geometric model fitting
0.642014
The Random Cluster Model for Robust Geometric Fitting · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2014
The Random Cluster Model for robust geometric fitting · CVPR 2012
Dynamic and hierarchical multi-structure geometric model fitting · ICCV 2011
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric estimation › geometric model fitting
hypothesis generation
0.542014
The Random Cluster Model for Robust Geometric Fitting · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2014
The Random Cluster Model for robust geometric fitting · CVPR 2012
Accelerated Hypothesis Generation for Multi-structure Robust Fitting · ECCV (5) 2010
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric estimation › geometric model fitting
multi-model fitting
0.432011
Simultaneous Sampling and Multi-Structure Fitting with Adaptive Reversible Jump MCMC · NIPS 2011
Dynamic and hierarchical multi-structure geometric model fitting · ICCV 2011
A global optimization approach to robust multi-model fitting · CVPR 2011
Visualization and visual analytics › visual analytics › visual sensemaking
hypothesis generation
0.112012
Accelerated Hypothesis Generation for Multistructure Data via Preference Analysis · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2012
Computational photography and imaging
robust geometric model fitting
0.112012
Accelerated Hypothesis Generation for Multistructure Data via Preference Analysis · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2012
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo
0.112011
Simultaneous Sampling and Multi-Structure Fitting with Adaptive Reversible Jump MCMC · NIPS 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
reversible jump MCMC
0.112011
Simultaneous Sampling and Multi-Structure Fitting with Adaptive Reversible Jump MCMC · NIPS 2011
Geometric modeling and processing
multi-view geometry
0.112011
An adversarial optimization approach to efficient outlier removal · ICCV 2011
Mathematical optimization
global optimization
0.112011
A global optimization approach to robust multi-model fitting · CVPR 2011
Mathematical optimization
outlier removal
0.112011
An adversarial optimization approach to efficient outlier removal · ICCV 2011
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › nonlinear optimization
quadratic programming
0.112011
A global optimization approach to robust multi-model fitting · CVPR 2011
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation
robust estimation
0.112011
An adversarial optimization approach to efficient outlier removal · ICCV 2011
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric estimation › geometric model fitting
robust model fitting
0.112010
Accelerated Hypothesis Generation for Multi-structure Robust Fitting · ECCV (5) 2010
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.112014
The Random Cluster Model for Robust Geometric Fitting · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2014
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph cut
0.112014
The Random Cluster Model for Robust Geometric Fitting · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2014
Computer vision › 3D vision
robust estimation
0.012011
Dynamic and hierarchical multi-structure geometric model fitting · ICCV 2011
Computer vision › 3D vision
structure estimation
0.012011
A global optimization approach to robust multi-model fitting · CVPR 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random cluster model · 0.5graph cuts · 0.5simulated annealing · 0.4quadratic programming · 0.2mixed-integer minmax optimization · 0.2linear programming · 0.2global convergent optimization · 0.2adversarial optimization · 0.2residual sorting · 0.1preference analysis · 0.1annealing · 0.1reversible jump MCMC · 0.1guided sampling · 0.1adaptive hypothesis generation · 0.1multi-structure fitting · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 The Random Cluster Model for Robust Geometric Fitting
abstract
Random hypothesis generation is central to robust geometric model fitting in computer vision. The predominant technique is to randomly sample minimal subsets of the data, and hypothesize the geometric models from the selected subsets. While taking minimal subsets increases the chance of successively "hitting" inliers in a sample, hypotheses fitted on minimal subsets may be severely biased due to the influence of measurement noise, even if the minimal subsets contain purely inliers. In this paper we propose Random Cluster Models, a technique used to simulate coupled spin systems, to conduct hypothesis generation using subsets larger than minimal. We show how large clusters of data from genuine instances of the model can be efficiently harvested to produce accurate hypotheses that are less affected by the vagaries of fitting on minimal subsets. A second aspect of the problem is the optimization of the set of structures that best fit the data. We show how our novel hypothesis sampler can be integrated seamlessly with graph cuts under a simple annealing framework to optimize the fitting efficiently. Unlike previous methods that conduct hypothesis sampling and fitting optimization in two disjoint stages, our algorithm performs the two subtasks alternatingly and in a mutually reinforcing manner. Experimental results show clear improvements in overall efficiency.
Trung-Thanh Pham, Tat-Jun Chin, Jin Yu 0001, David Suter
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.3
2013 A simultaneous sample-and-filter strategy for robust multi-structure model fitting
Hoi Sim Wong, Tat-Jun Chin, Jin Yu 0001, David Suter
Comput. Vis. Image Underst.3
2013 Mode seeking over permutations for rapid geometric model fitting
Hoi Sim Wong, Tat-Jun Chin, Jin Yu 0001, David Suter
Pattern Recognit.3
2012 The Random Cluster Model for robust geometric fitting
abstract
Random hypothesis generation is central to robust geometric model fitting in computer vision. The predominant technique is to randomly sample minimal or elemental subsets of the data, and hypothesize the geometric model from the selected subsets. While taking minimal subsets increases the chance of simultaneously “hitting” inliers in a sample, it amplifies the noise of the underlying model, and hypotheses fitted on minimal subsets may be severely biased even if they contain purely inliers. In this paper we propose to use Random Cluster Models, a technique used to simulate coupled spin systems, to conduct hypothesis generation using subsets larger than minimal. We show how large clusters of data from genuine instances of the geometric model can be efficiently harvested to produce more accurate hypotheses. To take advantage of our hypothesis generator, we construct a simple annealing method based on graph cuts to fit multiple instances of the geometric model in the data. Experimental results show clear improvements in efficiency over other methods based on minimal subset samplers.
Trung-Thanh Pham, Tat-Jun Chin, Jin Yu 0001, David Suter
CVPR3
2012 Accelerated Hypothesis Generation for Multistructure Data via Preference Analysis
abstract
Random hypothesis generation is integral to many robust geometric model fitting techniques. Unfortunately, it is also computationally expensive, especially for higher order geometric models and heavily contaminated data. We propose a fundamentally new approach to accelerate hypothesis sampling by guiding it with information derived from residual sorting. We show that residual sorting innately encodes the probability of two points having arisen from the same model, and is obtained without recourse to domain knowledge (e.g., keypoint matching scores) typically used in previous sampling enhancement methods. More crucially, our approach encourages sampling within coherent structures and thus can very rapidly generate all-inlier minimal subsets that maximize the robust criterion. Sampling within coherent structures also affords a natural ability to handle multistructure data, a condition that is usually detrimental to other methods. The result is a sampling scheme that offers substantial speed-ups on common computer vision tasks such as homography and fundamental matrix estimation. We show on many computer vision data, especially those with multiple structures, that ours is the only method capable of retrieving satisfactory results within realistic time budgets.
Tat-Jun Chin, Jin Yu 0001, David Suter
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
2011 A global optimization approach to robust multi-model fitting
abstract
We present a novel Quadratic Program (QP) formulation for robust multi-model fitting of geometric structures in vision data. Our objective function enforces both the fidelity of a model to the data and the similarity between its associated inliers. Departing from most previous optimization-based approaches, the outcome of our method is a ranking of a given set of putative models, instead of a pre-specified number of “good” candidates (or an attempt to decide the right number of models). This is particularly useful when the number of structures in the data is a priori unascertainable due to unknown intent and purposes. Another key advantage of our approach is that it operates in a unified optimization framework, and the standard QP form of our problem formulation permits globally convergent optimization techniques. We tested our method on several geometric multi-model fitting problems on both synthetic and real data. Experiments show that our method consistently achieves state-of-the-art results.
Jin Yu 0001, Tat-Jun Chin, David Suter
CVPR1
2011 Dynamic and hierarchical multi-structure geometric model fitting
abstract
The ability to generate good model hypotheses is instrumental to accurate and robust geometric model fitting. We present a novel dynamic hypothesis generation algorithm for robust fitting of multiple structures. Underpinning our method is a fast guided sampling scheme enabled by analysing correlation of preferences induced by data and hypothesis residuals. Our method progressively accumulates evidence in the search space, and uses the information to dynamically (1) identify outliers, (2) filter unpromising hypotheses, and (3) bias the sampling for active discovery of multiple structures in the data-All achieved without sacrificing the speed associated with sampling-based methods. Our algorithm yields a disproportionately higher number of good hypotheses among the sampling outcomes, i.e., most hypotheses correspond to the genuine structures in the data. This directly supports a novel hierarchical model fitting algorithm that elicits the underlying stratified manner in which the structures are organized, allowing more meaningful results than traditional “flat” multi-structure fitting.
Hoi Sim Wong, Tat-Jun Chin, Jin Yu 0001, David Suter
ICCV3
2011 An adversarial optimization approach to efficient outlier removal
abstract
This paper proposes a novel adversarial optimization approach to efficient outlier removal in computer vision. We characterize the outlier removal problem as a game that involves two players of conflicting interests, namely, optimizer and outlier. Such an adversarial view not only brings new insights into various existing methods, but also gives rise to a general optimization framework that provably unifies them. Under the proposed framework, we develop a new outlier removal approach that is able to offer a much needed control over the trade-off between reliability and speed, which is otherwise not available in previous methods. The proposed approach is driven by a mixed-integer minmax (convex-concave) optimization process. Although a minmax problem is generally not amenable to efficient optimization, we show that for some commonly used vision objective functions, an equivalent Linear Program reformulation exists. We demonstrate our method on two representative multiview geometry problems. Experiments on real image data illustrate superior practical performance of our method over recent techniques.
Jin Yu 0001, Anders P. Eriksson, Tat-Jun Chin, David Suter
ICCV1
2011 Simultaneous Sampling and Multi-Structure Fitting with Adaptive Reversible Jump MCMC
abstract
Multi-structure model fitting has traditionally taken a two-stage approach: First, sample a (large) number of model hypotheses, then select the subset of hypotheses that optimise a joint fitting and model selection criterion. This disjoint two-stage approach is arguably suboptimal and inefficient - if the random sampling did not retrieve a good set of hypotheses, the optimised outcome will not represent a good fit. To overcome this weakness we propose a new multi-structure fitting approach based on Reversible Jump MCMC. Instrumental in raising the effectiveness of our method is an adaptive hypothesis generator, whose proposal distribution is learned incrementally and online. We prove that this adaptive proposal satisfies the diminishing adaptation property crucial for ensuring ergodicity in MCMC. Our method effectively conducts hypothesis sampling and optimisation simultaneously, and gives superior computational efficiency over other methods.
Trung-Thanh Pham, Tat-Jun Chin, Jin Yu 0001, David Suter
NIPS3
2010 Efficient Multi-structure Robust Fitting with Incremental Top-k Lists Comparison
Hoi Sim Wong, Tat-Jun Chin, Jin Yu 0001, David Suter
ACCV (4)3
2010 Accelerated Hypothesis Generation for Multi-structure Robust Fitting
Tat-Jun Chin, Jin Yu 0001, David Suter
ECCV (5)2