Marat Boshernitsan

dblp:03/5124 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
4 papers
Software testing · 26% Software maintenance and evolution · 24% Compilers and program optimization · 24%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
User interface design and tools · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › test generation
automated test generation
0.112008
Predicting Effectiveness of Automatic Testing Tools · ASE 2008
Software maintenance and evolution › software evolution
code changes
0.112007
Aligning development tools with the way programmers think about code changes · CHI 2007
Compilers and program optimization
program transformation
0.112007
Aligning development tools with the way programmers think about code changes · CHI 2007
Programming languages and type systems › programming paradigms
visual programming
0.112007
Aligning development tools with the way programmers think about code changes · CHI 2007
Software maintenance and evolution
refactoring
0.112006
Interactive transformation of java programs in eclipse · ICSE 2006
Compilers and program optimization › program transformation
source-to-source transformation
0.112006
Interactive transformation of java programs in eclipse · ICSE 2006
Software testing
test input generation
0.112006
From daikon to agitator: lessons and challenges in building a commercial tool for developer testing · ISSTA 2006
Empirical software engineering
software metrics
0.012008
Predicting Effectiveness of Automatic Testing Tools · ASE 2008
Program analysis › specification mining
dynamic invariant detection
0.012006
From daikon to agitator: lessons and challenges in building a commercial tool for developer testing · ISSTA 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

visual language · 0.1task-centered design · 0.1program metrics · 0.1decision tree · 0.1software agitation · 0.1interactive transformation · 0.1dynamic invariant detection · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Predicting Effectiveness of Automatic Testing Tools
abstract
Automatic white-box test generation is a challenging problem. Many existing tools rely on complex code analyses and heuristics. As a result, structural features of an input program may impact tool effectiveness in ways that tool users and designers may not expect or understand. We develop a technique that uses structural program metrics to predict the test coverage achieved by three automatic test generation tools. We use coverage and structural metrics extracted from 11 software projects to train several decision tree classifiers. Our experiments show that these classifiers can predict high or low coverage with success rates of 82% to 94%.
Brett Daniel, Marat Boshernitsan
ASE2
2007 Aligning development tools with the way programmers think about code changes
abstract
Software developers must modify their programs to keepup with changing requirements and designs. Often, aconceptually simple change can require numerous editsthat are similar but not identical, leading to errors andomissions. Researchers have designed programming environmentsto address this problem, but most of thesesystems are counter-intuitive and difficult to use.By applying a task-centered design process, we developeda visual tool that allows programmers to makecomplex code transformations in an intuitive manner.This approach uses a representation that aligns wellwith programmers' mental models of programming structures.The visual language combines textual and graphicalelements and is expressive enough to support a broadrange of code-changing tasks. To simplify learning thesystem, its user interface scaffolds construction and executionof transformations. An evaluation with Java programmerssuggests that the interface is intuitive, easyto learn, and effective on a representative editing task.
Marat Boshernitsan, Susan L. Graham, Marti A. Hearst
CHI1
2006 Interactive transformation of java programs in eclipse
abstract
Implementing large and sweeping changes to software source code can be tedious and error-prone. A conceptually simple change may require a significant code editing effort. Integrating scriptable source-to-source program transformations into development environments can assist developers with this task. We present a developer-oriented interactive source code transformation tool for Java that addresses this need.
Marat Boshernitsan, Susan L. Graham
ICSE1
2006 From daikon to agitator: lessons and challenges in building a commercial tool for developer testing
abstract
Developer testing is of one of the most effective strategies for improving the quality of software, reducing its cost, and accelerating its development. Despite its widely recognized benefits, developer testing is practiced by only a minority of developers. The slow adoption of developer testing is primarily due to the lack of tools that automate some of the more tedious and time-consuming aspects of this practice. Motivated by the need for a solution, and helped and inspired by the research in software test automation, we created a developer testing tool based on software agitation. Software agitation is a testing technique that combines the results of research in test-input generation and dynamic invariant detection. We implemented software agitation in a commercial testing tool called Agitator. This paper gives a high-level overview of software agitation and its implementation in Agitator, focusing on the lessons and challenges of leveraging and applying the results of research to the implementation of a commercial product.
Marat Boshernitsan, Roong-Ko Doong, Alberto Savoia
ISSTA1