EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marat Boshernitsan
dblp:03/5124
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
4 papers |
Software testing · 26% Software maintenance and evolution · 24% Compilers and program optimization · 24% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
User interface design and tools · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing › test generation
automated test generation |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Predicting Effectiveness of Automatic Testing Tools · ASE 2008 |
Software maintenance and evolution › software evolution
code changes |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Aligning development tools with the way programmers think about code changes · CHI 2007 |
Compilers and program optimization
program transformation |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Aligning development tools with the way programmers think about code changes · CHI 2007 |
Programming languages and type systems › programming paradigms
visual programming |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Aligning development tools with the way programmers think about code changes · CHI 2007 |
Software maintenance and evolution
refactoring |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Interactive transformation of java programs in eclipse · ICSE 2006 |
Compilers and program optimization › program transformation
source-to-source transformation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Interactive transformation of java programs in eclipse · ICSE 2006 |
Software testing
test input generation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | From daikon to agitator: lessons and challenges in building a commercial tool for developer testing · ISSTA 2006 |
Empirical software engineering
software metrics |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Predicting Effectiveness of Automatic Testing Tools · ASE 2008 |
Program analysis › specification mining
dynamic invariant detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | From daikon to agitator: lessons and challenges in building a commercial tool for developer testing · ISSTA 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
visual language · 0.1task-centered design · 0.1program metrics · 0.1decision tree · 0.1software agitation · 0.1interactive transformation · 0.1dynamic invariant detection · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Predicting Effectiveness of Automatic Testing ToolsabstractAutomatic white-box test generation is a challenging problem. Many existing tools rely on complex code analyses and heuristics. As a result, structural features of an input program may impact tool effectiveness in ways that tool users and designers may not expect or understand. We develop a technique that uses structural program metrics to predict the test coverage achieved by three automatic test generation tools. We use coverage and structural metrics extracted from 11 software projects to train several decision tree classifiers. Our experiments show that these classifiers can predict high or low coverage with success rates of 82% to 94%. Brett Daniel, Marat Boshernitsan |
ASE | 2 |
| 2007 | Aligning development tools with the way programmers think about code changesabstractSoftware developers must modify their programs to keepup with changing requirements and designs. Often, aconceptually simple change can require numerous editsthat are similar but not identical, leading to errors andomissions. Researchers have designed programming environmentsto address this problem, but most of thesesystems are counter-intuitive and difficult to use.By applying a task-centered design process, we developeda visual tool that allows programmers to makecomplex code transformations in an intuitive manner.This approach uses a representation that aligns wellwith programmers' mental models of programming structures.The visual language combines textual and graphicalelements and is expressive enough to support a broadrange of code-changing tasks. To simplify learning thesystem, its user interface scaffolds construction and executionof transformations. An evaluation with Java programmerssuggests that the interface is intuitive, easyto learn, and effective on a representative editing task. Marat Boshernitsan, Susan L. Graham, Marti A. Hearst |
CHI | 1 |
| 2006 | Interactive transformation of java programs in eclipseabstractImplementing large and sweeping changes to software source code can be tedious and error-prone. A conceptually simple change may require a significant code editing effort. Integrating scriptable source-to-source program transformations into development environments can assist developers with this task. We present a developer-oriented interactive source code transformation tool for Java that addresses this need. Marat Boshernitsan, Susan L. Graham |
ICSE | 1 |
| 2006 | From daikon to agitator: lessons and challenges in building a commercial tool for developer testingabstractDeveloper testing is of one of the most effective strategies for improving the quality of software, reducing its cost, and accelerating its development. Despite its widely recognized benefits, developer testing is practiced by only a minority of developers. The slow adoption of developer testing is primarily due to the lack of tools that automate some of the more tedious and time-consuming aspects of this practice. Motivated by the need for a solution, and helped and inspired by the research in software test automation, we created a developer testing tool based on software agitation. Software agitation is a testing technique that combines the results of research in test-input generation and dynamic invariant detection. We implemented software agitation in a commercial testing tool called Agitator. This paper gives a high-level overview of software agitation and its implementation in Agitator, focusing on the lessons and challenges of leveraging and applying the results of research to the implementation of a commercial product. Marat Boshernitsan, Roong-Ko Doong, Alberto Savoia |
ISSTA | 1 |