Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marion Neumann
dblp:03/7789
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
8as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 7 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Graph learning · 39% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 34% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 11% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computing education · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computing education
AI education |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Model AI Assignments 2020 · AAAI 2020 Model AI Assignments 2019 · AAAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph classification |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | An End-to-End Deep Learning Architecture for Graph Classification · AAAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolution |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | An End-to-End Deep Learning Architecture for Graph Classification · AAAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process regression |
0.3 | 2 | 2015 | pyGPs: a Python library for Gaussian process regression and classification · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2015 Stacked Gaussian Process Learning · ICDM 2009 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | pyGPs: a Python library for Gaussian process regression and classification · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | pyGPs: a Python library for Gaussian process regression and classification · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2015 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel approximation
explicit feature maps |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Explicit Versus Implicit Graph Feature Maps: A Computational Phase Transition for Walk Kernels · ICDM 2014 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph kernel |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Explicit Versus Implicit Graph Feature Maps: A Computational Phase Transition for Walk Kernels · ICDM 2014 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › statistical relational learning
lifted inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Markov Logic Sets: Towards Lifted Information Retrieval Using PageRank and Label Propagation · AAAI 2011 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
statistical relational learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Markov Logic Sets: Towards Lifted Information Retrieval Using PageRank and Label Propagation · AAAI 2011 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Stacked Gaussian Process Learning · ICDM 2009 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Explicit Versus Implicit Graph Feature Maps: A Computational Phase Transition for Walk Kernels · ICDM 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sortpooling · 0.3graph kernel · 0.3end-to-end gradient-based training · 0.3random walks with restart · 0.2pagerank · 0.2markov logic · 0.2label propagation · 0.2r-convolution kernel · 0.2sparse approximation · 0.1meta-learning · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Capturing Student Feedback and Emotions in Large Computing Courses: A Sentiment Analysis ApproachabstractEnrollment numbers in computer science courses are higher than ever and keep growing. This renders communication and interaction of instructors with individual students extremely challenging, leading to an increase in anonymity (anonymity gap). Especially when students struggle in computing courses, personalized help is crucial for them to overcome their problems and frustration and eventually succeed in their studies. At the same time detecting students' misconceptions and gathering feedback at scale is time consuming, resulting in a lack of unbiased feedback available to course instructors (feedback gap). Real-time student feedback is a crucial source for instructors to adapt their teaching pace, teaching materials, or course content during the course of the semester to cater to an increasingly diverse student population. In this paper, we investigate a scalable approach to collect and analyze student feedback and emotions. We find that sentiment analysis can efficiently capture student emotions, bearing the potential to lessen both the anonymity and feedback gaps. Marion Neumann, Robin Linzmayer |
SIGCSE | 1 |
| 2020 | Model AI Assignments 2020abstractThe Model AI Assignments session seeks to gather and disseminate the best assignment designs of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Education community. Recognizing that assignments form the core of student learning experience, we here present abstracts of nine AI assignments from the 2020 session that are easily adoptable, playfully engaging, and flexible for a variety of instructor needs. Assignment specifications and supporting resources may be found at http://modelai.gettysburg.edu. Todd W. Neller, Stephen Keeley, Michael Guerzhoy, Wolfgang Hönig, Jiaoyang Li 0001, Sven Koenig, Ameet Soni, Krista Thomason, Lisa Zhang 0003, Bibin Sebastian, Cinjon Resnick, Avital Oliver, Surya Bhupatiraju, Kumar Krishna Agrawal, James Allingham, Sejong Yoon, Jonathan Chen, Tom Larsen, Marion Neumann, Narges Norouzi, Ryan Hausen, Matthew Evett |
AAAI | 19 |
| 2019 | Model AI Assignments 2019abstractThe Model AI Assignments session seeks to gather and disseminate the best assignment designs of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Education community. Recognizing that assignments form the core of student learning experience, we here present abstracts of ten AI assignments from the 2019 session that are easily adoptable, playfully engaging, and flexible for a variety of instructor needs. Assignment specifications and supporting resources may be found at http: //modelai.gettysburg.edu. Todd W. Neller, Raja Sooriamurthi, Michael Guerzhoy, Lisa Zhang 0003, Paul G. Talaga, Christopher Archibald, Adam Summerville, Joseph C. Osborn, Cinjon Resnick, Avital Oliver, Surya Bhupatiraju, Kumar Krishna Agrawal, Nate Derbinsky, Elena Strange, Marion Neumann, Jonathan Chen, Zac Christensen, Michael Wollowski, Oscar Youngquist |
AAAI | 15 |
| 2019 | A unifying view of explicit and implicit feature maps of graph kernelsabstractAbstract Non-linear kernel methods can be approximated by fast linear ones using suitable explicit feature maps allowing their application to large scale problems. We investigate how convolution kernels for structured data are composed from base kernels and construct corresponding feature maps. On this basis we propose exact and approximative feature maps for widely used graph kernels based on the kernel trick. We analyze for which kernels and graph properties computation by explicit feature maps is feasible and actually more efficient. In particular, we derive approximative, explicit feature maps for state-of-the-art kernels supporting real-valued attributes including the GraphHopper and graph invariant kernels. In extensive experiments we show that our approaches often achieve a classification accuracy close to the exact methods based on the kernel trick, but require only a fraction of their running time. Moreover, we propose and analyze algorithms for computing random walk, shortest-path and subgraph matching kernels by explicit and implicit feature maps. Our theoretical results are confirmed experimentally by observing a phase transition when comparing running time with respect to label diversity, walk lengths and subgraph size, respectively. Nils M. Kriege, Marion Neumann, Christopher Morris 0001, Kristian Kersting, Petra Mutzel |
Data Min. Knowl. Discov. | 2 |
| 2018 | An End-to-End Deep Learning Architecture for Graph ClassificationabstractNeural networks are typically designed to deal with data in tensor forms. In this paper, we propose a novel neural network architecture accepting graphs of arbitrary structure. Given a dataset containing graphs in the form of (G,y) where G is a graph and y is its class, we aim to develop neural networks that read the graphs directly and learn a classification function. There are two main challenges: 1) how to extract useful features characterizing the rich information encoded in a graph for classification purpose, and 2) how to sequentially read a graph in a meaningful and consistent order. To address the first challenge, we design a localized graph convolution model and show its connection with two graph kernels. To address the second challenge, we design a novel SortPooling layer which sorts graph vertices in a consistent order so that traditional neural networks can be trained on the graphs. Experiments on benchmark graph classification datasets demonstrate that the proposed architecture achieves highly competitive performance with state-of-the-art graph kernels and other graph neural network methods. Moreover, the architecture allows end-to-end gradient-based training with original graphs, without the need to first transform graphs into vectors. Muhan Zhang, Zhicheng Cui, Marion Neumann, Yixin Chen 0001 |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2016 | Propagation kernels: efficient graph kernels from propagated information
Marion Neumann, Roman Garnett, Christian Bauckhage, Kristian Kersting |
Mach. Learn. | 1 |
| 2015 | pyGPs: a Python library for Gaussian process regression and classification
Marion Neumann, Daniel E. Marthaler, Kristian Kersting |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2014 | Explicit Versus Implicit Graph Feature Maps: A Computational Phase Transition for Walk KernelsabstractAs many real-world data can elegantly be represented as graphs, various graph kernels and methods for computing them have been proposed. Surprisingly, many of the recent graph kernels do not employ the kernel trick anymore but rather compute an explicit feature map and report higher efficiency. So, is there really no benefit of the kernel trick when it comes to graphs? Triggered by this question, we investigate under which conditions it is possible to compute a graph kernel explicitly and for which graph properties this computation is actually more efficient. We give a sufficient condition for R-convolution kernels that enables kernel computation by explicit mapping. We theoretically and experimentally analyze efficiency and flexibility of implicit kernel functions and dot products of explicitly computed feature maps for widely used graph kernels such as random walk kernels, sub graph matching kernels, and shortest-path kernels. For walk kernels we observe a phase transition when comparing runtime with respect to label diversity and walk lengths leading to the conclusion that explicit computations are only favourable for smaller label sets and walk lengths whereas implicit computation is superior for longer walk lengths and data sets with larger label diversity. Nils M. Kriege, Marion Neumann, Kristian Kersting, Petra Mutzel |
ICDM | 2 |
| 2014 | Erosion Band Features for Cell Phone Image Based Plant Disease ClassificationabstractWe introduce a novel set of features for a challenging image analysis task in agriculture where cell phone camera images of beet leaves are analyzed as to the presence of plant diseases. Aiming at minimal computational costs on the cellular device and highly accurate prediction results, we present an efficient detector of potential disease regions and a robust classification method based on texture features. We evaluate several first- and second-order statistical features for classifying textures of leaf spots and we find that a combination of descriptors derived on multiple erosion bands of the RGB color channels, as well as, the local binary patterns of gradient magnitudes of the extracted regions accurately distinguish between symptoms caused by five diseases, including infections of the fungi Cercospora beticola, Ramularia beticola, Uromyces betae, and Phoma betae, and the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. aptata. Marion Neumann, Lisa Hallau, Benjamin Klatt, Kristian Kersting, Christian Bauckhage |
ICPR | 1 |
| 2013 | Coinciding Walk Kernels: Parallel Absorbing Random Walks for Learning with Graphs and Few LabelsabstractExploiting autocorrelation for node-label prediction in networked data has led to great success. However, when dealing with sparsely labeled networks, common in present-day tasks, the autocorrelation assumption is difficult to exploit. Taking a step beyond, we propose the coinciding walk kernel (cwk), a novel kernel leveraging label-structure similarity – the idea that nodes with similarly arranged labels in their local neighbourhoods are likely to have the same label – for learning problems on partially labeled graphs. Inspired by the success of random walk based schemes for the construction of graph kernels, cwk is defined in terms of the probability that the labels encountered during parallel random walks coincide. In addition to its intuitive probabilistic interpretation, coinciding walk kernels outperform existing kernel- and walk-based methods on the task of node-label prediction in sparsely labeled graphs with high label-structure similarity. We also show that computing cwks is faster than many state-of-the-art kernels on graphs. We evaluate cwks on several real- world networks, including cocitation and coauthor graphs, as well as a graph of interlinked populated places extracted from the dbpedia knowledge base. Marion Neumann, Roman Garnett, Kristian Kersting |
ACML | 1 |
| 2012 | Efficient Graph Kernels by Randomization
Marion Neumann, Novi Patricia, Roman Garnett, Kristian Kersting |
ECML/PKDD (1) | 1 |
| 2011 | Markov Logic Sets: Towards Lifted Information Retrieval Using PageRank and Label PropagationabstractInspired by “GoogleTM Sets” and Bayesian sets, we consider the problem of retrieving complex objects and relations among them, i.e., ground atoms from a logical concept, given a query consisting of a few atoms from that concept. We formulate this as a within-network relational learning problem using few labels only and describe an algorithm that ranks atoms using a score based on random walks with restart (RWR): the probability that a random surfer hits an atom starting from the query atoms. Specifically, we compute an initial ranking using personalized PageRank. Then, we find paths of atoms that are connected via their arguments, variablize the ground atoms in each path, in order to create features for the query. These features are used to re-personalize the original RWR and to finally compute the set completion, based on Label Propagation. Moreover, we exploit that RWR techniques can naturally be lifted and show that lifted inference for label propagation is possible. We evaluate our algorithm on a realworld relational dataset by finding completions of sets of objects describing the Roman city of Pompeii. We compare to Bayesian sets and show that our approach gives very reasonable set completions. Marion Neumann, Babak Ahmadi, Kristian Kersting |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2009 | Stacked Gaussian Process LearningabstractTriggered by a market relevant application that involves making joint predictions of pedestrian and public transit flows in urban areas, we address the question of how to utilize hidden common cause relations among variables of interest in order to improve performance in the two related regression tasks. Specifically, we propose stacked Gaussian process learning, a meta-learning scheme in which a base Gaussian process is enhanced by adding the posterior covariance functions of other related tasks to its covariance function in a stage-wise optimization. The idea is that the stacked posterior covariances encode the hidden common causes among variables of interest that are shared across the related regression tasks. Stacked Gaussian process learning is efficient, capable of capturing shared common causes, and can be implemented with any kind of standard Gaussian process regression model such as sparse approximations and relational variants. Our experimental results on real-world data from the market relevant application show that stacked Gaussian processes learning can significantly improve prediction performance of a standard Gaussian process. Marion Neumann, Kristian Kersting, Zhao Xu 0001, Daniel Schulz |
ICDM | 1 |