Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Frank Mendel

dblp:03/8072 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 87% Computational science and engineering · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics › medical simulation
musculoskeletal simulation
0.112009
Case Studies of Musculoskeletal-Simulation-Based Rehabilitation Program Evaluation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2009
Medical and health informatics
rehabilitation
0.112009
Case Studies of Musculoskeletal-Simulation-Based Rehabilitation Program Evaluation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2009
Computational science and engineering › engineering design
simulation-based design
0.012009
Case Studies of Musculoskeletal-Simulation-Based Rehabilitation Program Evaluation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parametric study · 0.1optimization · 0.1musculoskeletal analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Case Studies of Musculoskeletal-Simulation-Based Rehabilitation Program Evaluation
abstract
Variability in motor rehabilitation program outcomes can be attributed not only to individual components (human patient/rehabilitation equipment) but also to their system-level interactions. Thus, effective deployment of a rehabilitation program depends upon: 1) suitable therapist selection of user-device ergonomics; 2) adjustable device settings; and 3) exercise regimen parameters; to achieve desired system-level motor performance. In this paper, we discuss aspects of creation of a virtual design environment, leveraging tools from musculoskeletal analysis, optimization, and simulation-based design, to permit therapists to rapidly evaluate and systematically customize rehabilitation programs. Specifically, this framework is intended to facilitate 1) parametric study of ergonomic/device/regimen settings on musculoskeletal performance; 2) use of design tools such as optimization for decision support in arriving at the best program; and 3) scaffolded examination of linkage between form and function by iterative what-if type of analyses. We use two case studies (bicep-curling and motor rehabilitative driving) to highlight benefits of such simulation-based rehabilitation program evaluation.
Leng-Feng Lee, Madusudanan Sathia Narayanan, Srikanth Kannan, Frank Mendel, Venkat N. Krovi
IEEE Trans. Robotics4