Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Evan K. Maxwell

dblp:03/8315 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0002-7325-7531ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Computational science and engineering · 33%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 56% Debugging and program repair · 44%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
copy number variation detection
0.212016
CLAMMS: a scalable algorithm for calling common and rare copy number variants from exome sequencing data · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › next-generation sequencing data analysis
exome sequencing analysis
0.212016
CLAMMS: a scalable algorithm for calling common and rare copy number variants from exome sequencing data · Bioinform. 2016
Computational science and engineering › latent variable model
mixture model
0.212016
CLAMMS: a scalable algorithm for calling common and rare copy number variants from exome sequencing data · Bioinform. 2016
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining
0.112010
Diagnosing memory leaks using graph mining on heap dumps · KDD 2010
Data mining
pattern mining
0.112010
Diagnosing memory leaks using graph mining on heap dumps · KDD 2010
Debugging and program repair
fault localization
0.112010
Diagnosing memory leaks using graph mining on heap dumps · KDD 2010
Program analysis › error detection
memory leak detection
0.112010
Diagnosing memory leaks using graph mining on heap dumps · KDD 2010
Program analysis
heap analysis
0.012010
Diagnosing memory leaks using graph mining on heap dumps · KDD 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical inference · 0.2lattice-aligned mixture model · 0.2graph grammar mining · 0.2dominator tree mining · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 CLAMMS: a scalable algorithm for calling common and rare copy number variants from exome sequencing data
abstract
MOTIVATION: Several algorithms exist for detecting copy number variants (CNVs) from human exome sequencing read depth, but previous tools have not been well suited for large population studies on the order of tens or hundreds of thousands of exomes. Their limitations include being difficult to integrate into automated variant-calling pipelines and being ill-suited for detecting common variants. To address these issues, we developed a new algorithm--Copy number estimation using Lattice-Aligned Mixture Models (CLAMMS)--which is highly scalable and suitable for detecting CNVs across the whole allele frequency spectrum. RESULTS: In this note, we summarize the methods and intended use-case of CLAMMS, compare it to previous algorithms and briefly describe results of validation experiments. We evaluate the adherence of CNV calls from CLAMMS and four other algorithms to Mendelian inheritance patterns on a pedigree; we compare calls from CLAMMS and other algorithms to calls from SNP genotyping arrays for a set of 3164 samples; and we use TaqMan quantitative polymerase chain reaction to validate CNVs predicted by CLAMMS at 39 loci (95% of rare variants validate; across 19 common variant loci, the mean precision and recall are 99% and 94%, respectively). In the Supplementary Materials (available at the CLAMMS Github repository), we present our methods and validation results in greater detail. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/rgcgithub/clamms (implemented in C). CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Jonathan S. Packer, Evan K. Maxwell, Colm O'Dushlaine, Alexander E. Lopez, Frederick E. Dewey, Rostislav Chernomorsky, Aris Baras, John D. Overton, Lukas Habegger, Jeffrey G. Reid
Bioinform.2
2010 Diagnosing memory leaks using graph mining on heap dumps
abstract
Memory leaks are caused by software programs that prevent the reclamation of memory that is no longer in use. They can cause significant slowdowns, exhaustion of available storage space and, eventually, application crashes. Detecting memory leaks is challenging because real-world applications are built on multiple layers of software frameworks, making it difficult for a developer to know whether observed references to objects are legitimate or the cause of a leak. We present a graph mining solution to this problem wherein we analyze heap dumps to automatically identify subgraphs which could represent potential memory leak sources. Although heap dumps are commonly analyzed in existing heap profiling tools, our work is the first to apply a graph grammar mining solution to this problem. Unlike classical graph mining work, we show that it suffices to mine the dominator tree of the heap dump, which is significantly smaller than the underlying graph. Our approach identifies not just leaking candidates and their structure, but also provides aggregate information about the access path to the leaks. We demonstrate several synthetic as well as real-world examples of heap dumps for which our approach provides more insight into the problem than state-of-the-art tools such as Eclipse's MAT.
Evan K. Maxwell, Godmar Back, Naren Ramakrishnan
KDD1