EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tim L. Alderson
dblp:04/1089 · also T. L. Alderson
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
10as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-7608-5122ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 6 · 6 first-author · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 4 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Coding theory · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
lee codes |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bounds on MLDR Codes Over 핫pt · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes
MDS codes |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On the Weights of General MDS Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
weight distribution |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On the Weights of General MDS Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020 |
Coding theory › sequences › sequence design
optical orthogonal codes |
0.4 | 2 | 2018 | 3-Dimensional Optical Orthogonal Codes With Ideal Autocorrelation-Bounds and Optimal Constructions · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018 Families of Optimal OOCs With lambda = 2 · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2008 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
coding bounds |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | 3-Dimensional Optical Orthogonal Codes With Ideal Autocorrelation-Bounds and Optimal Constructions · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › coding bounds › minimum distance bounds
johnson bound |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | 3-Dimensional Optical Orthogonal Codes With Ideal Autocorrelation-Bounds and Optimal Constructions · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
combinatorial argument · 0.9combinatorial proof · 0.4singer cycle · 0.3finite projective geometry · 0.3singer groups · 0.1hyperovals · 0.1finite projective spaces · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | When arcs extend uniquely: a higher-dimensional generalization of Barlotti's result
Tim L. Alderson |
Des. Codes Cryptogr. | 1 |
| 2025 | Bounds on MLDR Codes Over 핫ptabstractUpper bounds on the minimum Lee distance of codes that are linear over Zq,q=pt,pprime are discussed. The bounds are Singleton like, depending on the length, rank, and alphabet size of the code. Codes meeting such bounds are referred to as Maximum Lee Distance with respect to Rank (MLDR) Codes. We present some new bounds on MLDR codes, using combinatorial arguments. In the context of MLDR codes, our work provides improvements over existing bounds in the literature. Tim L. Alderson |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2020 | On the Weights of General MDS CodesabstractThe weight spectra of MDS codes of length n and dimension k over arbitrary alphabets are studied. For all q-ary MDS codes of dimension k and length n ≠ q + k - 1 containing the zero codeword, it is shown that all k weights from n to n - k + 1 are realized. The weight spectrum in the remaining case n = q + k - 1 is also determined. Additionally, we prove that all binary MDS codes are equivalent to linear MDS codes. The proofs are combinatorial, and self contained. Tim L. Alderson |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2018 | 3-Dimensional Optical Orthogonal Codes With Ideal Autocorrelation-Bounds and Optimal ConstructionsabstractSeveral new constructions of 3-D optical orthogonal codes are presented here. In each case, the codes have ideal OFF-peak autocorrelation λa= 0, and in all, but one case a cross correlation of λc= 1. All codes produced are optimal with respect to the applicable Johnson bound either presented or developed here. Thus, on one hand the codes are as large as possible, and on the other, the bound(s) are shown to be tight. All codes are constructed by using a particular automorphism (a singer cycle) of PG(k, q), the finite projective geometry of dimension k over the field of order q, or by using an affine analogue in AG(k, q). Tim L. Alderson |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2009 | 2-dimensional optical orthogonal codes from singer groups
Tim L. Alderson, Keith E. Mellinger |
Discret. Appl. Math. | 1 |
| 2009 | On the maximality of linear codes
Tim L. Alderson, András Gács |
Des. Codes Cryptogr. | 1 |
| 2008 | Coprimitive sets and inextendable codes
Tim L. Alderson, Aiden A. Bruen |
Des. Codes Cryptogr. | 1 |
| 2008 | Families of Optimal OOCs With lambda = 2abstractWe provide a new construction yielding one new and one known infinite family of optimal (n,w,2) -optical orthogonal codes,wisin {4,6}. Our construction relies on various techniques in finite projective spaces involving hyperovals in projective planes and Singer groups. Tim L. Alderson, Keith E. Mellinger |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2007 | Constructions of Optical Orthogonal Codes from Finite GeometryabstractThe link between finite geometry and various classes of error-correcting codes is well known. Arcs in projective spaces, for instance, have a close tie to linear MDS codes as well as the high-performing low-density parity-check codes. In this article, we demonstrate a connection between arcs and optical orthogonal codes (OOCs), a class of nonlinear binary codes used for many modern communication applications. Using arcs and Baer subspaces of finite projective spaces, we construct some infinite classes of OOCs with auto-correlation and cross-correlation both larger than 1. Tim L. Alderson, Keith E. Mellinger |
SIAM J. Discret. Math. | 1 |
| 2006 | (6, 3)-MDS Codes over an Alphabet of Size 4
Tim L. Alderson |
Des. Codes Cryptogr. | 1 |