EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
William Edwards
dblp:04/1213
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 91% Reinforcement learning · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot learning
data-driven control |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Automatic Tuning for Data-driven Model Predictive Control · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Automatic Tuning for Data-driven Model Predictive Control · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Automatic Tuning for Data-driven Model Predictive Control · ICRA 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Automatic Tuning for Data-driven Model Predictive Control · ICRA 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
system identification · 0.5optimization · 0.5automatic tuning · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Automatic Tuning for Data-driven Model Predictive ControlabstractModel predictive control (MPC) is a powerful feedback technique that is often used in data-driven robotics. The performance of data-driven MPC depends on the accuracy of the model, which often requires careful tuning. Furthermore, specifying the task with an objective function and synthesizing a feedback policy are not straightforward and typically lead to suboptimal solutions driven by trial and error. To address these challenges, we present a method to jointly optimize the data-driven system identification, task specification, and control synthesis of unknown dynamical systems. We use our method to develop AutoMPC3, a software package designed to automate and optimize data-driven MPC. Empirical evaluation on the pendulum swing-up, cart-pole swing-up, and half-cheetah running demonstrates that our method finds data-driven control policies that outperform offline reinforcement learning, without any hand-tuning. William Edwards, Gao Tang, Giorgos Mamakoukas, Todd D. Murphey, Kris Hauser |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2017 | Semi-boustrophedon coverage with a dubins vehicleabstractThis paper addresses the problem of generating coverage paths-that is, paths that pass within some sensor footprint of every point in an environment-for vehicles with Dubins motion constraints. We extend previous work that solves this coverage problem as a traveling salesman problem (TSP) by introducing a practical heuristic algorithm to reduce runtime while maintaining near-optimal path length. Furthermore, we show that generating an optimal coverage path is NP-hard by reducing from the Exact Cover problem, which provides justification for our algorithm's conversion of Dubins coverage instances to TSP instances. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the algorithm does indeed produce length paths comparable to optimal in significantly less time. Jeremy S. Lewis, William Edwards, Kelly Benson, Ioannis M. Rekleitis, Jason M. O'Kane |
IROS | 2 |