EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wiebke Sieben
dblp:04/3117
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 70% Electronic design automation · 30% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › high-level synthesis
scheduling |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | A hybrid Markov chain model for workload on parallel computers · HPDC 2010 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | A hybrid Markov chain model for workload on parallel computers · HPDC 2010 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › workload characterization
workload modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | A hybrid Markov chain model for workload on parallel computers · HPDC 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
markov chain · 0.1empirical distribution function · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | A hybrid Markov chain model for workload on parallel computersabstractThis paper proposes a comprehensive modeling architecture for workloads on parallel computers using Markov chains in combination with state dependent empirical distribution functions. This hybrid approach is based on the requirements of scheduling algorithms: the model considers the four essential job attributes submission time, number of required processors, estimated processing time, and actual processing time. So far, no model exists that considers all those attributed at the same time. To assess the goodness-of-fit of a workload model the similarity between sequences of real jobs and jobs generated from the model needs to be captured. We propose to reduce the complexity of this task and to evaluate the model by comparing the results of a widely-used scheduling algorithm instead. This approach is demonstrated with commonly used scheduling objectives. To verify this evaluation technique, standard criteria for assessing the goodness-of-fit for workload models are additionally applied. Anne Krampe, Joachim Lepping, Wiebke Sieben |
HPDC | 3 |
| 2007 | Classifying Alarms in Intensive Care - Analogy to Hypothesis Testing
Wiebke Sieben, Ursula Gather |
AIME | 1 |