Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
François Lagarde
dblp:04/4406
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Improving uml profile design practices by leveraging conceptual domain models · ASE 2007 |
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering › UML
UML profiles |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Improving uml profile design practices by leveraging conceptual domain models · ASE 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
design patterns · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | An Automated Process for Implementing Multilevel Domain Models
Frédéric Mallet, François Lagarde, Charles André, Sébastien Gérard, François Terrier |
SLE | 2 |
| 2008 | Leveraging Patterns on Domain Models to Improve UML Profile Definition
François Lagarde, Huáscar Espinoza, François Terrier, Charles André, Sébastien Gérard |
FASE | 1 |
| 2007 | Improving uml profile design practices by leveraging conceptual domain modelsabstractThe profile extension mechanism has permitted a rapid growth of the use of UML as a domain-specific modeling language. However, designing profiles typically falls into ad-hoc processes that often rely on domain-inappropriate primitives. One of the fundamental reasons is that profiles are specified on the same level of abstraction as the UML abstract syntax and consequently they narrow down the design space to an implementation level. In order to improvethis situation, some profile designers start from a "conceptual domain model" that states the domain ontology, and only then deal with finding out the profile extensions to support it. In spite of this, building truthfulness conceptual domain models and maintaining traceable mapping with the profile view is a bit of an art. In this paper, we propose to systematize the design of UML profiles built-upon conceptual domain models, by adopting a minimal setof framing rules. As these rules are defined on the basis of regularly occurring design patterns, domain models can be afterward checked for self-consistency and interactively transformed in stereotypes, tags and constraints François Lagarde, Huáscar Espinoza, François Terrier, Sébastien Gérard |
ASE | 1 |
| 2005 | Issues in mapping CORBA Component Model to OSEKabstractThe component/container paradigm helps to reduce the complexity and enhance the scalability of software development for plain desktop or enterprise systems. However, the frameworks enabling this approach are often not suitable for systems with limited processing power and memory sizes, and are not dedicated to real-time requirements. As part of the European IST project COMPARE, we study a possible projection from a high-level component model (CORBA component model) towards a low-level RT/E platform (OSEK). Preliminary results from this study are accounted in this paper. In the first part, the main features of CCM and OSEK are examined. Then we propose execution and communication models using an API for OSEK that is as similar as possible to that in the CCM framework. François Lagarde, Ansgar Radermacher, Sylvain Robert, Sébastien Gérard, David Servat |
ISORC | 1 |