Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christoph Helma

dblp:04/5151 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
0000-0002-2640-798XORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
5 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 84% Computational science and engineering · 11% Medical and health informatics · 5%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › pattern mining › graph pattern mining
frequent subgraph mining
0.122009
Large-scale graph mining using backbone refinement classes · KDD 2009
Molecular feature mining in HIV data · KDD 2001
Data mining
pattern mining
0.122009
Large-scale graph mining using backbone refinement classes · KDD 2009
Molecular feature mining in HIV data · KDD 2001
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular property prediction
predictive toxicology
0.132003
Statistical Evaluation of the Predictive Toxicology Challenge 2000-2001 · Bioinform. 2003
A Survey of the Predictive Toxicology Challenge 2000-2001 · Bioinform. 2003
The Predictive Toxicology Challenge 2000-2001 · Bioinform. 2001
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
model quality assessment
0.122003
Statistical Evaluation of the Predictive Toxicology Challenge 2000-2001 · Bioinform. 2003
A Survey of the Predictive Toxicology Challenge 2000-2001 · Bioinform. 2003
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular property prediction › predictive toxicology
carcinogenicity prediction
0.122003
A Survey of the Predictive Toxicology Challenge 2000-2001 · Bioinform. 2003
The Predictive Toxicology Challenge 2000-2001 · Bioinform. 2001
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics
cheminformatics
0.022003
Molecular feature mining in HIV data · KDD 2001
A Survey of the Predictive Toxicology Challenge 2000-2001 · Bioinform. 2003
Computational science and engineering
statistical significance testing
0.012003
Statistical Evaluation of the Predictive Toxicology Challenge 2000-2001 · Bioinform. 2003
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
feature reduction
0.012009
Large-scale graph mining using backbone refinement classes · KDD 2009
Medical and health informatics › biomedical data science
cancer informatics
0.011997
Mining for Causes of Cancer: Machine Learning Experiments at Various Levels of Detail · KDD 1997
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification
0.011997
Mining for Causes of Cancer: Machine Learning Experiments at Various Levels of Detail · KDD 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

structural inter-feature entropy · 0.1dynamic upper bound pruning · 0.1cross-validation · 0.1backbone refinement classes · 0.1predictive modeling · 0.1levelwise version space algorithm · 0.1statistical hypothesis testing · 0.0ROC analysis · 0.0machine learning · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Efficient mining for structurally diverse subgraph patterns in large molecular databases
Andreas Maunz, Christoph Helma, Stefan Kramer 0001
Mach. Learn.2
2010 Latent Structure Pattern Mining
Andreas Maunz, Christoph Helma, Tobias Cramer, Stefan Kramer 0001
ECML/PKDD (2)2
2009 Large-scale graph mining using backbone refinement classes
abstract
We present a new approach to large-scale graph mining based on so-called backbone refinement classes. The method efficiently mines tree-shaped subgraph descriptors under minimum frequency and significance constraints, using classes of fragments to reduce feature set size and running times. The classes are defined in terms of fragments sharing a common backbone. The method is able to optimize structural inter-feature entropy as opposed to occurrences, which is characteristic for open or closed fragment mining. In the experiments, the proposed method reduces feature set sizes by >90 % and >30 % compared to complete tree mining and open tree mining, respectively. Evaluation using crossvalidation runs shows that their classification accuracy is similar to the complete set of trees but significantly better than that of open trees. Compared to open or closed fragment mining, a large part of the search space can be pruned due to an improved statistical constraint (dynamic upper bound adjustment), which is also confirmed in the experiments in lower running times compared to ordinary (static) upper bound pruning. Further analysis using large-scale datasets yields insight into important properties of the proposed descriptors, such as the dataset coverage and the class size represented by each descriptor. A final cross-validation run confirms that the novel descriptors render large training sets feasible which previously might have been intractable.
Andreas Maunz, Christoph Helma, Stefan Kramer 0001
KDD2
2003 A Survey of the Predictive Toxicology Challenge 2000-2001
abstract
Abstract Motivation: The Predictive Toxicology Challenge (PTC) was initiated to stimulate the development of advanced techniques for predictive toxicology models. The goal of this challenge was to compare different approaches for the prediction of rodent carcinogenicity, based on the experimental results of the US National Toxicology Program (NTP). Results: 111 sets of predictions for 185 compounds have been evaluated on quantitative and qualitative scales to select the most predictive models and those with the highest toxicological relevance. The accuracy of the submitted predictions was between 25 and 79 %. An evaluation of the most accurate models by toxicological experts showed, that it is still hard for domain experts to interpret the submitted models and to put them into relation with toxicological knowledge. Availability: PTC details and data can be found at: http://www.predictive-toxicology.org/ptc/ Contact: [email protected] * To whom correspondence should be addressed. † Present address: Institute for Computer Science, Technical University Munich, D-85748, Garching, Germany.
Christoph Helma, Stefan Kramer 0001
Bioinform.1
2003 Statistical Evaluation of the Predictive Toxicology Challenge 2000-2001
abstract
MOTIVATION: The development of in silico models to predict chemical carcinogenesis from molecular structure would help greatly to prevent environmentally caused cancers. The Predictive Toxicology Challenge (PTC) competition was organized to test the state-of-the-art in applying machine learning to form such predictive models. RESULTS: Fourteen machine learning groups generated 111 models. The use of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) space allowed the models to be uniformly compared regardless of the error cost function. We developed a statistical method to test if a model performs significantly better than random in ROC space. Using this test as criteria five models performed better than random guessing at a significance level p of 0.05 (not corrected for multiple testing). Statistically the best predictor was the Viniti model for female mice, with p value below 0.002. The toxicologically most interesting models were Leuven2 for male mice, and Kwansei for female rats. These models performed well in the statistical analysis and they are in the middle of ROC space, i.e. distant from extreme cost assumptions. These predictive models were also independently judged by domain experts to be among the three most interesting, and are believed to include a small but significant amount of empirically learned toxicological knowledge. AVAILABILITY: PTC details and data can be found at: http://www.predictive-toxicology.org/ptc/.
Hannu Toivonen, Ashwin Srinivasan 0001, Ross D. King, Stefan Kramer 0001, Christoph Helma
Bioinform.5
2001 Molecular feature mining in HIV data
abstract
We present the application of Feature Mining techniques to the Developmental Therapeutics Program's AIDS antiviral screen database. The database consists of 43576 compounds, which were measured for their capability to protect human cells from HIV-1 infection. According to these measurements, the compounds were classified as either active, moderately active or inactive. The distribution of classes is extremely skewed: Only 1.3 % of the molecules is known to be active, and 2.7 % is known to be moderately active. Given this database, we were interested in molecular substructures (i.e., features) that are frequent in the active molecules, and infrequent in the inactives. In data mining terms, we focused on features with a minimum support in active compounds and a maximum support in inactive compounds. We analyzed the database using the levelwise version space algorithm that forms the basis of the inductive query and database system MOLFEA (Molecular Feature Miner). Within this framework, it is possible to declaratively specify the features of interest, such as the frequency of features on (possibly different) datasets as well as on the generality and syntax of them. Assuming that the detected substructures are causally related to biochemical mechanisms, it should be possible to facilitate the development of new pharmaceuticals with improved activities.
Stefan Kramer 0001, Luc De Raedt, Christoph Helma
KDD3
2001 The Predictive Toxicology Challenge 2000-2001
abstract
Abstract Summary: We initiated the Predictive Toxicology Challenge (PTC) to stimulate the development of advanced SAR techniques for predictive toxicology models. The goal of this challenge is to predict the rodent carcinogenicity of new compounds based on the experimental results of the US National Toxicology Program (NTP). Submissions will be evaluated on quantitative and qualitative scales to select the most predictive models and those with the highest toxicological relevance. Availability: http://www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~ml/ptc/ Contact: [email protected] * To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Christoph Helma, Ross D. King, Stefan Kramer 0001, Ashwin Srinivasan 0001
Bioinform.1
1997 Mining for Causes of Cancer: Machine Learning Experiments at Various Levels of Detail
Stefan Kramer 0001, Bernhard Pfahringer, Christoph Helma
KDD3