Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kishore Bubna
dblp:04/5302
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
3D vision · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
robust estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Estimating Model Parameters and Boundaries By Minimizing a Joint, Robust Objective Function · CVPR 1999 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation
m-estimators |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Estimating Model Parameters and Boundaries By Minimizing a Joint, Robust Objective Function · CVPR 1999 |
Mathematical optimization
robust statistics |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Estimating Model Parameters and Boundaries By Minimizing a Joint, Robust Objective Function · CVPR 1999 |
Geometric modeling and processing
model selection |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Model Selection and Surface Merging in Reconstruction Algorithms · ICCV 1998 |
Geometric modeling and processing › shape modeling › shape editing › mesh editing
surface merging |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Model Selection and Surface Merging in Reconstruction Algorithms · ICCV 1998 |
Geometric modeling and processing
surface reconstruction |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Model Selection and Surface Merging in Reconstruction Algorithms · ICCV 1998 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
geometric constraints |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Geometric constraints and stereo disparity computation · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1996 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › stereo vision
stereo matching |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Geometric constraints and stereo disparity computation · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1996 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
stereo vision |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Geometric constraints and stereo disparity computation · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1996 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
robust objective function · 0.0domain bounding m-estimator · 0.0bootstrapped criteria · 0.0bayesian criteria · 0.0akaike criterion · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | Model Selection Techniques and Merging Rules for Range Data Segmentation Algorithms
Kishore Bubna, Charles V. Stewart |
Comput. Vis. Image Underst. | 1 |
| 1999 | Estimating Model Parameters and Boundaries By Minimizing a Joint, Robust Objective FunctionabstractMany problems in computer vision require estimation of both model parameters and boundaries, which limits the usefulness of standard estimation techniques from statistics. Example problems include surface reconstruction from range data, estimation of parametric motion models, fitting circular or elliptic arcs to edgel data, and many others. This paper introduces a new estimation technique, called the "Domain Bounding M-Estimator", which is a generalization of ordinary M-estimators combining error measures on model parameters and boundaries in a joint, robust objective function. Minimization of the objective function given a rough initialization yields simultaneous estimates of parameters and boundaries. The DBM-Estimator has been applied to estimating line segments, surfaces, and the symmetry transformation between two edgel chains. It is unaffected by outliers and prevents boundary estimates from crossing even small magnitude discontinuities. Charles V. Stewart, Kishore Bubna, A. G. Amitha Perera |
CVPR | 2 |
| 1998 | Model Selection and Surface Merging in Reconstruction AlgorithmsabstractThe problem of model selection is relevant to many areas of computer vision. Model selection criteria have been used in the vision literature and many more have been proposed in statistics, but the relative strengths of these criteria have not been analyzed in vision. More importantly, suitable extensions to these criteria must be made to solve problems unique to computer vision. Using the problem of surface reconstruction as our context, we analyze existing criteria using simulations and sensor data, introduce new criteria from statistics, develop novel criteria capable of handling unknown error distributions and outliers, and extend model selection criteria to apply to the surface merging problem. The new surface merging rules improve upon previous results, and work well even at small step heights (h=3/spl sigma/) and crease discontinuities. Our results show that a Bayesian criteria and its bootstrapped variant perform the best, although for time-sensitive applications, a variant of the Akaike criterion may be a better choice. Unfortunately, none of the criteria work reliably for small region sizes, implying that model selection and surface merging should be avoided unless the region size is sufficiently large. Kishore Bubna, Charles V. Stewart |
ICCV | 1 |
| 1996 | Geometric constraints and stereo disparity computation
Charles V. Stewart, Robin Y. Flatland, Kishore Bubna |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 3 |