Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alvaro Rada-Iglesias

dblp:04/6097 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
0000-0001-7137-1341ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene expression classification
0.112008
Monte Carlo feature selection for supervised classification · Bioinform. 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

monte carlo sampling · 0.1decision tree · 0.1cross-validation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Monte Carlo feature selection for supervised classification
abstract
MOTIVATION: Pre-selection of informative features for supervised classification is a crucial, albeit delicate, task. It is desirable that feature selection provides the features that contribute most to the classification task per se and which should therefore be used by any classifier later used to produce classification rules. In this article, a conceptually simple but computer-intensive approach to this task is proposed. The reliability of the approach rests on multiple construction of a tree classifier for many training sets randomly chosen from the original sample set, where samples in each training set consist of only a fraction of all of the observed features. RESULTS: The resulting ranking of features may then be used to advantage for classification via a classifier of any type. The approach was validated using Golub et al. leukemia data and the Alizadeh et al. lymphoma data. Not surprisingly, we obtained a significantly different list of genes. Biological interpretation of the genes selected by our method showed that several of them are involved in precursors to different types of leukemia and lymphoma rather than being genes that are common to several forms of cancers, which is the case for the other methods. AVAILABILITY: Prototype available upon request.
Michal Draminski, Alvaro Rada-Iglesias, Stefan Enroth, Claes Wadelius, Jacek Koronacki, Jan Komorowski
Bioinform.2