Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christoph Lucas
dblp:04/8318
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation |
0.3 | 2 | 2013 | A Dynamic Tradeoff between Active and Passive Corruptions in Secure Multi-Party Computation · CRYPTO (2) 2013 Hybrid-secure MPC: trading information-theoretic robustness for computational privacy · PODC 2010 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › adversarial model
corruption models |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | A Dynamic Tradeoff between Active and Passive Corruptions in Secure Multi-Party Computation · CRYPTO (2) 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fault-tolerant distributed computation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | A Dynamic Tradeoff between Active and Passive Corruptions in Secure Multi-Party Computation
Martin Hirt, Christoph Lucas, Ueli Maurer |
CRYPTO (2) | 2 |
| 2013 | Erratum: A Dynamic Tradeoff between Active and Passive Corruptions in Secure Multi-Party Computation
Martin Hirt, Christoph Lucas, Ueli Maurer |
CRYPTO (2) | 2 |
| 2010 | Hybrid-secure MPC: trading information-theoretic robustness for computational privacyabstractMost protocols for distributed, fault-tolerant computation, or multi-party computation (MPC), provide security guarantees in an all-or-nothing fashion. In contrast, a hybrid-secure protocol provides different security guarantees depending on the set of corrupted parties and the computational power of the adversary, without being aware of the actual adversarial setting. Thus, hybrid-secure MPC protocols allow for graceful degradation of security. Christoph Lucas, Dominik Raub, Ueli Maurer |
PODC | 1 |