Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Neeraj Kumar 0006
dblp:04/8395-6
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 9 · 4 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 2Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Face, body and person analysis · 48% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 23% Image recognition and object detection · 18% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visual content generation and editing · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 21 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face alignment |
0.3 | 2 | 2013 | Localizing Parts of Faces Using a Consensus of Exemplars · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2013 Localizing parts of faces using a consensus of exemplars · CVPR 2011 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › face recognition
face verification |
0.2 | 2 | 2011 | Describable Visual Attributes for Face Verification and Image Search · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2011 Attribute and simile classifiers for face verification · ICCV 2009 |
Information retrieval
image retrieval |
0.2 | 2 | 2011 | Describable Visual Attributes for Face Verification and Image Search · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2011 FaceTracer: A Search Engine for Large Collections of Images with Faces · ECCV (4) 2008 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Localizing Parts of Faces Using a Consensus of Exemplars · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
non-parametric methods |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Localizing Parts of Faces Using a Consensus of Exemplars · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2013 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
attribute recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Multi-attribute spaces: Calibration for attribute fusion and similarity search · CVPR 2012 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
fine-grained image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Leafsnap: A Computer Vision System for Automatic Plant Species Identification · ECCV (2) 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › plant biology
plant species identification |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Leafsnap: A Computer Vision System for Automatic Plant Species Identification · ECCV (2) 2012 |
Information retrieval
similarity search |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Multi-attribute spaces: Calibration for attribute fusion and similarity search · CVPR 2012 |
Information retrieval › image retrieval › semantic image retrieval
attribute-based image retrieval |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Describable Visual Attributes for Face Verification and Image Search · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2011 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face recognition |
0.1 | 2 | 2011 | FaceTracer: A Search Engine for Large Collections of Images with Faces · ECCV (4) 2008 Describable Visual Attributes for Face Verification and Image Search · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2011 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › facial attribute analysis
facial attribute recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Attribute and simile classifiers for face verification · ICCV 2009 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › feature matching › local feature matching
patch matching |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | What Is a Good Nearest Neighbors Algorithm for Finding Similar Patches in Images? · ECCV (2) 2008 |
Visual content generation and editing › face editing
face swapping |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Face swapping: automatically replacing faces in photographs · ACM Trans. Graph. 2008 |
Visual content generation and editing › image editing › image compositing
image blending |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Face swapping: automatically replacing faces in photographs · ACM Trans. Graph. 2008 |
Algorithms and data structures › similarity search
nearest neighbor search |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | What Is a Good Nearest Neighbors Algorithm for Finding Similar Patches in Images? · ECCV (2) 2008 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › face recognition › robust face recognition
unconstrained face recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Localizing Parts of Faces Using a Consensus of Exemplars · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
extreme value theory |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Multi-attribute spaces: Calibration for attribute fusion and similarity search · CVPR 2012 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › speaker recognition › speaker verification
score normalization |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Multi-attribute spaces: Calibration for attribute fusion and similarity search · CVPR 2012 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › object modeling
shape and appearance modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Localizing parts of faces using a consensus of exemplars · CVPR 2011 |
Privacy and data protection › anonymization › multimedia anonymization
face anonymization |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Face swapping: automatically replacing faces in photographs · ACM Trans. Graph. 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
score calibration · 0.3extreme value theory · 0.3computer vision · 0.3attribute fusion · 0.3attribute classifier · 0.2face detection · 0.2exemplar-based modeling · 0.2consensus optimization · 0.2match distance ranking · 0.2face alignment · 0.2non-parametric global model · 0.1consensus of exemplars · 0.1boosting · 0.1bayesian inference · 0.1nearest neighbor algorithms · 0.1face matching · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Localizing Parts of Faces Using a Consensus of ExemplarsabstractWe present a novel approach to localizing parts in images of human faces. The approach combines the output of local detectors with a nonparametric set of global models for the part locations based on over 1,000 hand-labeled exemplar images. By assuming that the global models generate the part locations as hidden variables, we derive a Bayesian objective function. This function is optimized using a consensus of models for these hidden variables. The resulting localizer handles a much wider range of expression, pose, lighting, and occlusion than prior ones. We show excellent performance on real-world face datasets such as Labeled Faces in the Wild (LFW) and a new Labeled Face Parts in the Wild (LFPW) and show that our localizer achieves state-of-the-art performance on the less challenging BioID dataset. Peter N. Belhumeur, David Jacobs 0001, David J. Kriegman, Neeraj Kumar 0006 |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 4 |
| 2012 | Multi-attribute spaces: Calibration for attribute fusion and similarity searchabstractRecent work has shown that visual attributes are a powerful approach for applications such as recognition, image description and retrieval. However, fusing multiple attribute scores - as required during multi-attribute queries or similarity searches - presents a significant challenge. Scores from different attribute classifiers cannot be combined in a simple way; the same score for different attributes can mean different things. In this work, we show how to construct normalized “multi-attribute spaces” from raw classifier outputs, using techniques based on the statistical Extreme Value Theory. Our method calibrates each raw score to a probability that the given attribute is present in the image. We describe how these probabilities can be fused in a simple way to perform more accurate multiattribute searches, as well as enable attribute-based similarity searches. A significant advantage of our approach is that the normalization is done after-the-fact, requiring neither modification to the attribute classification system nor ground truth attribute annotations. We demonstrate results on a large data set of nearly 2 million face images and show significant improvements over prior work. We also show that perceptual similarity of search results increases by using contextual attributes. Walter J. Scheirer, Neeraj Kumar 0006, Peter N. Belhumeur, Terrance E. Boult |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2012 | Leafsnap: A Computer Vision System for Automatic Plant Species Identification
Neeraj Kumar 0006, Peter N. Belhumeur, Arijit Biswas, David Jacobs 0001, W. John Kress, Ida C. Lopez, João V. B. Soares |
ECCV (2) | 1 |
| 2011 | Localizing parts of faces using a consensus of exemplarsabstractWe present a novel approach to localizing parts in images of human faces. The approach combines the output of local detectors with a non-parametric set of global models for the part locations based on over one thousand hand-labeled exemplar images. By assuming that the global models generate the part locations as hidden variables, we derive a Bayesian objective function. This function is optimized using a consensus of models for these hidden variables. The resulting localizer handles a much wider range of expression, pose, lighting and occlusion than prior ones. We show excellent performance on a new dataset gathered from the internet and show that our localizer achieves state-of-the-art performance on the less challenging BioID dataset. Peter N. Belhumeur, David Jacobs 0001, David J. Kriegman, Neeraj Kumar 0006 |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2011 | Two faces are better than one: Face recognition in group photographsabstractFace recognition systems classically recognize people individually. When presented with a group photograph containing multiple people, such systems implicitly assume statistical independence between each detected face. We question this basic assumption and consider instead that there is a dependence between face regions from the same image; after all, the image was acquired with a single camera, under consistent lighting (distribution, direction, spectrum), camera motion, and scene/camera geometry. Such naturally occurring commonalities between face images can be exploited when recognition decisions are made jointly across the faces, rather than independently. Furthermore, when recognizing people in isolation, some features such as color are usually uninformative in unconstrained settings. But by considering pairs of people, the relative color difference provides valuable information. This paper reconsiders the independence assumption, introduces new features and methods for recognizing pairs of individuals in group photographs, and demonstrates a marked improvement when these features are used in joint decision making vs. independent decision making. While these features alone are only moderately discriminative, we combine these new features with state-of art attribute features and demonstrate effective recognition performance. Initial experiments on two datasets show promising improvements in accuracy. Ohil K. Manyam, Neeraj Kumar 0006, Peter N. Belhumeur, David J. Kriegman |
IJCB | 2 |
| 2011 | Fusing with context: A Bayesian approach to combining descriptive attributesabstractFor identity related problems, descriptive attributes can take the form of any information that helps represent an individual, including age data, describable visual attributes, and contextual data. With a rich set of descriptive at- tributes, it is possible to enhance the base matching accuracy of a traditional face identification system through intelligent score weighting. If we can factor any attribute differences between people into our match score calculation, we can deemphasize incorrect results, and ideally lift the correct matching record to a higher rank position. Naturally, the presence of all descriptive attributes during a match instance cannot be expected, especially when considering non-biometric context. Thus, in this paper, we examine the application of Bayesian Attribute Networks to combine descriptive attributes and produce accurate weighting factors to apply to match scores from face recognition systems based on incomplete observations made at match time. We also examine the pragmatic concerns of attribute network creation, and introduce a Noisy-OR formulation for stream- lined truth value assignment and more accurate weighting. Experimental results show that incorporating descriptive attributes into the matching process significantly enhances face identification over the baseline by up to 32.8%. Walter J. Scheirer, Neeraj Kumar 0006, Karl Ricanek, Peter N. Belhumeur, Terrance E. Boult |
IJCB | 2 |
| 2011 | Describable Visual Attributes for Face Verification and Image SearchabstractWe introduce the use of describable visual attributes for face verification and image search. Describable visual attributes are labels that can be given to an image to describe its appearance. This paper focuses on images of faces and the attributes used to describe them, although the concepts also apply to other domains. Examples of face attributes include gender, age, jaw shape, nose size, etc. The advantages of an attribute-based representation for vision tasks are manifold: They can be composed to create descriptions at various levels of specificity; they are generalizable, as they can be learned once and then applied to recognize new objects or categories without any further training; and they are efficient, possibly requiring exponentially fewer attributes (and training data) than explicitly naming each category. We show how one can create and label large data sets of real-world images to train classifiers which measure the presence, absence, or degree to which an attribute is expressed in images. These classifiers can then automatically label new images. We demonstrate the current effectiveness--and explore the future potential--of using attributes for face verification and image search via human and computational experiments. Finally, we introduce two new face data sets, named FaceTracer and PubFig, with labeled attributes and identities, respectively. Neeraj Kumar 0006, Alexander C. Berg, Peter N. Belhumeur, Shree K. Nayar |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2009 | Attribute and simile classifiers for face verificationabstractWe present two novel methods for face verification. Our first method - “attribute” classifiers - uses binary classifiers trained to recognize the presence or absence of describable aspects of visual appearance (e.g., gender, race, and age). Our second method - “simile” classifiers - removes the manual labeling required for attribute classification and instead learns the similarity of faces, or regions of faces, to specific reference people. Neither method requires costly, often brittle, alignment between image pairs; yet, both methods produce compact visual descriptions, and work on real-world images. Furthermore, both the attribute and simile classifiers improve on the current state-of-the-art for the LFW data set, reducing the error rates compared to the current best by 23.92% and 26.34%, respectively, and 31.68% when combined. For further testing across pose, illumination, and expression, we introduce a new data set - termed PubFig - of real-world images of public figures (celebrities and politicians) acquired from the internet. This data set is both larger (60,000 images) and deeper (300 images per individual) than existing data sets of its kind. Finally, we present an evaluation of human performance. Neeraj Kumar 0006, Alexander C. Berg, Peter N. Belhumeur, Shree K. Nayar |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2008 | FaceTracer: A Search Engine for Large Collections of Images with Faces
Neeraj Kumar 0006, Peter N. Belhumeur, Shree K. Nayar |
ECCV (4) | 1 |
| 2008 | What Is a Good Nearest Neighbors Algorithm for Finding Similar Patches in Images?
Neeraj Kumar 0006, Li Zhang 0003, Shree K. Nayar |
ECCV (2) | 1 |
| 2008 | Face swapping: automatically replacing faces in photographsabstractIn this paper, we present a complete system for automatic face replacement in images. Our system uses a large library of face images created automatically by downloading images from the internet, extracting faces using face detection software, and aligning each extracted face to a common coordinate system. This library is constructed off-line, once, and can be efficiently accessed during face replacement. Our replacement algorithm has three main stages. First, given an input image, we detect all faces that are present, align them to the coordinate system used by our face library, and select candidate face images from our face library that are similar to the input face in appearance and pose. Second, we adjust the pose, lighting, and color of the candidate face images to match the appearance of those in the input image, and seamlessly blend in the results. Third, we rank the blended candidate replacements by computing a match distance over the overlap region. Our approach requires no 3D model, is fully automatic, and generates highly plausible results across a wide range of skin tones, lighting conditions, and viewpoints. We show how our approach can be used for a variety of applications including face de-identification and the creation of appealing group photographs from a set of images. We conclude with a user study that validates the high quality of our replacement results, and a discussion on the current limitations of our system. Dmitri Bitouk, Neeraj Kumar 0006, Samreen Dhillon, Peter N. Belhumeur, Shree K. Nayar |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 2 |