Data structures that maintain a sorted sequence are crucial for many applications. There is a zoo of variants with recent particular interest in "learned" indexes that accelerate operations by learning the distribution of the data. This paper helps to bring some order to this complex situation. We identify important building blocks and model the input using smoothed analysis where an adversary can control the dynamically changing input except for a small amount of noise. Within a resulting design space of data structures, we prove that already a simple 2-level data structure with minimal learning can achieve constant operation times in many situations: PARROT partitions the input into equal size parts, within which keys are approximately uniformly distributed. In many of our experiments, PARROT performs very well compared to state-of-the-art learned indexes, being 2× faster than the well known ALEX and LIPP indexes on large datasets, and 10× faster than a well engineered standard B-Tree.

A minimal perfect hash function (minimal PHF) is a data structure mapping a static set of n keys to n bins without collisions. Two natural generalizations are minimal k-PHFs where n keys are mapped to n/k bins of capacity k each, and (non-minimal) PHFs with load factor α < 1 where the number of bins is increased by a factor of 1/α, resulting in spare capacity. While there has been a recent surge of interest in perfect hashing generally, non-minimal k-PHFs have not been systematically studied despite a natural use case of speeding up static hash tables: The idea is that a small cache-resident k-PHF maps each key x to a cache-line-sized bin of capacity k where x resides. Ideally, this yields a branchless lookup operation with a single cache miss working at high load factors for positive and negative queries alike. Our main theoretical contribution is to determine tight space lower bounds for k-PHFs for all pairs of α ∈ (0,1] and k ≥ 1. It turns out that combining α < 1 and k ≥ 2 drastically reduces the space of k-PHFs, e.g. for (k,α) = (16,0.8) the space lower bound is 0.027 bits per key while for (k,α) = (16,1.0) and (k,α) = (1,0.8) the lower bounds are higher by factors of ≈ 8 and ≈ 32, respectively. On the practical side, we develop a k-PHF based on PtrHash and tune it for use in static hash tables. Empirically, our implementation produces k-PHFs of size roughly 50% above the lower bound. A static hash set based on this k-PHF is consistently at least as fast as other hash sets for negative and mixed queries. On two of the three tested architectures it achieves up to 1.5× speedup for large n ≥ 30M where a 1-PHF does not fit in cache.

A minimal perfect hash function (MPHF) maps a set of n keys to unique positions {1, ..., n}. Representing an MPHF requires at least 1.44 bits per key. ShockHash is a technique to construct an MPHF and requires just slightly more space. It gives each key two pseudo random candidate positions. If each key can be mapped to one of its two candidate positions such that there is exactly one key mapped to each position, then an MPHF is found. If not, ShockHash repeats the process with a new set of random candidate positions. ShockHash has to store how many repetitions were required and for each key to which of the two candidate positions it is mapped. However, when a given set of candidate positions can be used as MPHF then there is not only one but multiple ways of mapping the keys to one of their candidate positions such that the mapping results in an MPHF. This redundancy makes up for the majority of the remaining space overhead in ShockHash. In this paper, we present MorphisHash which is a technique that almost completely eliminates this redundancy. Our theoretical result is that MorphisHash saves Θ(ln(n)) bits compared to ShockHash. This corresponds to a factor of 20 less space overhead in practice. The technique to accomplish this might be of a more general interest to compress data structures.

Given a set S of n keys, a k-perfect hash function (kPHF) is a data structure that maps the keys to the first m integers, where each output integer can be hit by at most k input keys. When m=n/k, the resulting function is called a minimal k-perfect hash function (MkPHF). Applications of kPHFs can be found in external memory data structures or to create efficient 1-perfect hash functions, which in turn have a wide range of applications from databases to bioinformatics. Several papers from the 1980s look at external memory data structures with small internal memory indexes. However, actual k-perfect hash functions are surprisingly rare, and the area has not seen a lot of research recently. At the same time, recent research in 1-perfect hashing shows that there is a lack of efficient kPHFs. In this paper, we revive the area of k-perfect hashing, presenting four new constructions. Our implementations simultaneously dominate older approaches in space consumption, construction time, and query time. We see this paper as a possible starting point of an active line of research, similar to the area of 1-perfect hashing.

A minimal perfect hash function (MPHF) maps a set of n keys to {1, ..., n} without collisions. Such functions find widespread application e.g. in bioinformatics and databases. In this paper we revisit PTHash - a construction technique particularly designed for fast queries. PTHash distributes the input keys into small buckets and, for each bucket, it searches for a hash function seed that places its keys in the output domain without collisions. The collection of all seeds is then stored in a compressed way. Since the first buckets are easier to place, buckets are considered in non-increasing order of size. Additionally, PTHash heuristically produces an imbalanced distribution of bucket sizes by distributing 60% of the keys into 30% of the buckets. Our main contribution is to characterize, up to lower order terms, an optimal distribution of expected bucket sizes. We arrive at a simple, closed form solution which improves construction throughput for space efficient configurations in practice. Our second contribution is a novel encoding scheme for the seeds. We split the keys into partitions. Within each partition, we run the bucket distribution and search step. We then store the seeds in an interleaved way by consecutively placing the seeds for the i-th buckets from all partitions. The seeds for the i-th bucket of each partition follow the same statistical distribution. This allows us to tune a compressor for each bucket. Hence, we call our technique PHOBIC - Perfect Hashing with Optimized Bucket sizes and Interleaved Coding. Compared to PTHash, PHOBIC is 0.17 bits/key more space efficient for same query time and construction throughput. We also contribute a GPU implementation to further accelerate MPHF construction. For a configuration with fast queries, PHOBIC-GPU can construct a perfect hash function at 2.17 bits/key in 28 ns per key, which can be queried in 37 ns on the CPU.