Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhi Chen 0009
dblp:05/1539-9
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-1993-5749ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Language models and text generation · 10% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 10% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Exploring and Interacting with the Set of Good Sparse Generalized Additive Models · NeurIPS 2023 Exploring the Whole Rashomon Set of Sparse Decision Trees · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
rashomon set |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Exploring and Interacting with the Set of Good Sparse Generalized Additive Models · NeurIPS 2023 Exploring the Whole Rashomon Set of Sparse Decision Trees · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI › self-interpretable models
generalized additive model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Exploring and Interacting with the Set of Good Sparse Generalized Additive Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
decision tree learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Exploring the Whole Rashomon Set of Sparse Decision Trees · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
sparse decision trees |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Exploring the Whole Rashomon Set of Sparse Decision Trees · NeurIPS 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › synthetic text generation
adversarial text generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Adversarial Feature Matching for Text Generation · ICML 2017 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
feature matching |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Adversarial Feature Matching for Text Generation · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Adversarial Feature Matching for Text Generation · ICML 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Adversarial Feature Matching for Text Generation · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
feature importance |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Exploring and Interacting with the Set of Good Sparse Generalized Additive Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Exploring the Whole Rashomon Set of Sparse Decision Trees · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
ellipsoid approximation · 0.7specialized data structure · 0.6sampling · 0.6complete enumeration · 0.6long short-term memory · 0.3kernelized discrepancy metric · 0.3convolutional network · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Sparse and Faithful Explanations Without Sparse ModelsabstractEven if a model is not globally sparse, it is possible for decisions made from that model to be accurately and faithfully described by a small number of features. For instance, an application for a large loan might be denied to someone because they have no credit history, which overwhelms any evidence towards their creditworthiness. In this work, we introduce the Sparse Explanation Value (SEV), a new way of measuring sparsity in machine learning models. In the loan denial example above, the SEV is 1 because only one factor is needed to explain why the loan was denied. SEV is a measure of decision sparsity rather than overall model sparsity, and we are able to show that many machine learning models – even if they are not sparse – actually have low decision sparsity, as measured by SEV. SEV is defined using movements over a hypercube, allowing SEV to be defined consistently over various model classes, with movement restrictions reflecting real-world constraints. Our algorithms reduce SEV without sacrificing accuracy, providing sparse and completely faithful explanations, even without globally sparse models. Yiyang Sun 0001, Zhi Chen 0009, Vittorio Orlandi, Tong Wang 0011, Cynthia Rudin |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2023 | Exploring and Interacting with the Set of Good Sparse Generalized Additive ModelsabstractIn real applications, interaction between machine learning models and domain experts is critical; however, the classical machine learning paradigm that usually produces only a single model does not facilitate such interaction. Approximating and exploring the Rashomon set, i.e., the set of all near-optimal models, addresses this practical challenge by providing the user with a searchable space containing a diverse set of models from which domain experts can choose. We present algorithms to efficiently and accurately approximate the Rashomon set of sparse, generalized additive models with ellipsoids for fixed support sets and use these ellipsoids to approximate Rashomon sets for many different support sets. The approximated Rashomon set serves as a cornerstone to solve practical challenges such as (1) studying the variable importance for the model class; (2) finding models under user-specified constraints (monotonicity, direct editing); and (3) investigating sudden changes in the shape functions. Experiments demonstrate the fidelity of the approximated Rashomon set and its effectiveness in solving practical challenges. Chudi Zhong, Zhi Chen 0009, Jiachang Liu 0001, Margo I. Seltzer, Cynthia Rudin |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2022 | Exploring the Whole Rashomon Set of Sparse Decision TreesabstractIn any given machine learning problem, there may be many models that could explain the data almost equally well. However, most learning algorithms return only one of these models, leaving practitioners with no practical way to explore alternative models that might have desirable properties beyond what could be expressed within a loss function. The Rashomon set is the set of these all almost-optimal models. Rashomon sets can be extremely complicated, particularly for highly nonlinear function classes that allow complex interaction terms, such as decision trees. We provide the first technique for completely enumerating the Rashomon set for sparse decision trees; in fact, our work provides the first complete enumeration of any Rashomon set for a non-trivial problem with a highly nonlinear discrete function class. This allows the user an unprecedented level of control over model choice among all models that are approximately equally good. We represent the Rashomon set in a specialized data structure that supports efficient querying and sampling. We show three applications of the Rashomon set: 1) it can be used to study variable importance for the set of almost-optimal trees (as opposed to a single tree), 2) the Rashomon set for accuracy enables enumeration of the Rashomon sets for balanced accuracy and F1-score, and 3) the Rashomon set for a full dataset can be used to produce Rashomon sets constructed with only subsets of the data set. Thus, we are able to examine Rashomon sets across problems with a new lens, enabling users to choose models rather than be at the mercy of an algorithm that produces only a single model. Rui Xin 0002, Chudi Zhong, Zhi Chen 0009, Takuya Takagi, Margo I. Seltzer, Cynthia Rudin |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2017 | Adversarial Feature Matching for Text GenerationabstractThe Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) has achieved great success in generating realistic (real-valued) synthetic data. However, convergence issues and difficulties dealing with discrete data hinder the applicability of GAN to text. We propose a framework for generating realistic text via adversarial training. We employ a long short-term memory network as generator, and a convolutional network as discriminator. Instead of using the standard objective of GAN, we propose matching the high-dimensional latent feature distributions of real and synthetic sentences, via a kernelized discrepancy metric. This eases adversarial training by alleviating the mode-collapsing problem. Our experiments show superior performance in quantitative evaluation, and demonstrate that our model can generate realistic-looking sentences. Yizhe Zhang 0002, Zhe Gan, Kai Fan 0002, Zhi Chen 0009, Ricardo Henao, Dinghan Shen, Lawrence Carin |
ICML | 4 |