Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pierre Lemerle
dblp:05/1951
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 56% Robot manipulation · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Robust balance optimization control of humanoid robots with multiple non coplanar grasps and frictional contacts · ICRA 2008 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › humanoid robot control
humanoid balance control |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Robust balance optimization control of humanoid robots with multiple non coplanar grasps and frictional contacts · ICRA 2008 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
optimization-based control |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Robust balance optimization control of humanoid robots with multiple non coplanar grasps and frictional contacts · ICRA 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stability criteria · 0.1optimization · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Humanoid push recovery control in case of multiple non-coplanar contactsabstractThis paper presents a method for humanoid push recovery in the general context of multiple non-coplanar contacts. The method consists of a controller that minimizes the kinetic energy of a perturbed whole body humanoid system, while controlling the support change to achieve the stabilization (or push recovery) of the system. The controller uses a simple model based approach to determine the necessity of support change and in this case to approximate a new contact position that allows to stabilize the system. The controller is tested on a simulated humanoid robot and it succeeds in stabilizing the robot in coplanar and non-coplanar environments. Darine Mansour, Alain Micaelli, Pierre Lemerle |
IROS | 3 |
| 2011 | A computational approach for push recovery in case of multiple noncoplanar contactsabstractThis paper presents a new computational approach for humanoid push recovery in a generalized noncoplanar multicontact context. Our approach is based on a simplified model and consists of two main steps. The first one predicts whether the perturbed system can be stopped in a final static state while maintaining fixed contacts with the environment. This prediction can be seen as a dynamic stability indicator. The second one consists of a strategy that stabilizes the system, when stability cannot be reached, through a contact change chosen as the best one among a set of a priori possible contact changes. Darine Mansour, Alain Micaelli, Pierre Lemerle |
IROS | 3 |
| 2008 | Robust balance optimization control of humanoid robots with multiple non coplanar grasps and frictional contactsabstractWhile realizing a task, human-beings are able to use grasping inside their environment in order to keep the most stable balance. Although such a behavior is quite natural for humans, it is very difficult to find the best formulation to adapt human motion to humanoid robots. This paper proposes a conceptually simple framework of human posture control based on optimization which takes into account grasp and friction and achieves robustness against external disturbances. A new stability criteria is also introduced. Contrary to most other approaches, our method deals not only with unilateral contacts with friction but also with bilateral grasps. This allows for arbitrarily pulling, pushing or twisting on a handhold. Additionally, and in contrast to classical methods based on ZMP, our method also accounts for contacts not being all in the same plane. Cyrille Collette, Alain Micaelli, Claude Andriot, Pierre Lemerle |
ICRA | 4 |