Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pierre Lemerle

dblp:05/1951 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 56% Robot manipulation · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping
0.112008
Robust balance optimization control of humanoid robots with multiple non coplanar grasps and frictional contacts · ICRA 2008
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › humanoid robot control
humanoid balance control
0.112008
Robust balance optimization control of humanoid robots with multiple non coplanar grasps and frictional contacts · ICRA 2008
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
optimization-based control
0.012008
Robust balance optimization control of humanoid robots with multiple non coplanar grasps and frictional contacts · ICRA 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stability criteria · 0.1optimization · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Humanoid push recovery control in case of multiple non-coplanar contacts
abstract
This paper presents a method for humanoid push recovery in the general context of multiple non-coplanar contacts. The method consists of a controller that minimizes the kinetic energy of a perturbed whole body humanoid system, while controlling the support change to achieve the stabilization (or push recovery) of the system. The controller uses a simple model based approach to determine the necessity of support change and in this case to approximate a new contact position that allows to stabilize the system. The controller is tested on a simulated humanoid robot and it succeeds in stabilizing the robot in coplanar and non-coplanar environments.
Darine Mansour, Alain Micaelli, Pierre Lemerle
IROS3
2011 A computational approach for push recovery in case of multiple noncoplanar contacts
abstract
This paper presents a new computational approach for humanoid push recovery in a generalized noncoplanar multicontact context. Our approach is based on a simplified model and consists of two main steps. The first one predicts whether the perturbed system can be stopped in a final static state while maintaining fixed contacts with the environment. This prediction can be seen as a dynamic stability indicator. The second one consists of a strategy that stabilizes the system, when stability cannot be reached, through a contact change chosen as the best one among a set of a priori possible contact changes.
Darine Mansour, Alain Micaelli, Pierre Lemerle
IROS3
2008 Robust balance optimization control of humanoid robots with multiple non coplanar grasps and frictional contacts
abstract
While realizing a task, human-beings are able to use grasping inside their environment in order to keep the most stable balance. Although such a behavior is quite natural for humans, it is very difficult to find the best formulation to adapt human motion to humanoid robots. This paper proposes a conceptually simple framework of human posture control based on optimization which takes into account grasp and friction and achieves robustness against external disturbances. A new stability criteria is also introduced. Contrary to most other approaches, our method deals not only with unilateral contacts with friction but also with bilateral grasps. This allows for arbitrarily pulling, pushing or twisting on a handhold. Additionally, and in contrast to classical methods based on ZMP, our method also accounts for contacts not being all in the same plane.
Cyrille Collette, Alain Micaelli, Claude Andriot, Pierre Lemerle
ICRA4