The development of highly accurate protein structure prediction algorithms has led to an explosion of structural data, transforming our understanding of protein structure-function relationships across diverse organisms. Domain classifications such as the Evolutionary Classification of Protein Domains (ECOD) have incorporated these computational predictions alongside experimental structures to create comprehensive resources for the research community. The AlphaFold Protein Structure Database (AFDB) plays a unique role, providing millions of predicted structures that ECOD has systematically classified for human proteins, small pathogens, and reference proteomes. Here, we extend this classification framework to the UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot dataset, applying the Domain Parser for AlphaFold Models (DPAM) pipeline to classify domains from over 542,000 Swiss-Prot protein structure predictions, resulting in more than 1,032,000 classified domains. These domains span 3,493 ECOD topologies and display high assignment confidence (mean DPAM probability: 0.992), with extensive taxonomic and functional diversity. Notably, over 100,000 domains lack existing Pfam mappings, reflecting the extended sensitivity of structure-based classification and identifying domain groups not yet captured by sequence-based profiles. These results significantly expand ECOD's coverage into a functionally and taxonomically diverse protein space, anchoring high-confidence structure predictions in an evolutionary framework. By integrating Swiss-Prot predictions, we enhance the utility and interpretability of AlphaFold models and establish a foundation for future large-scale, functionally informed domain classifications.

MOTIVATION: Due to the breakthrough in protein structure prediction by AlphaFold, the scientific community has access to 200 million predicted protein structures with near-atomic accuracy from the AlphaFold protein structure DataBase (AFDB), covering nearly the entire protein universe. Segmenting these models into domains and classifying them into an evolutionary hierarchy hold tremendous potential for unraveling essential insights into protein function. RESULTS: We introduce DPAM-AI, a Domain Parser for AlphaFold Models based on Artificial Intelligence. DPAM-AI utilizes a convolutional neural network trained with previously classified domains in the Evolutionary Classification Of protein Domains (ECOD) database. DPAM-AI integrates inter-residue distances, predicted aligned errors, and sequence and structural alignments to previously classified domains detected via sequence (HHsuite) and structural (Dali) similarity searches. DPAM-AI has demonstrated its power through rigorous tests, excelling in several benchmark sets compared to its predecessor, DPAM, and other recently published domain parsers, Merizo and Chainsaw. We applied DPAM-AI to representative AFDB models for proteins classified in Pfam. We obtained representative 3D structures for 18 487 (89%) of the 20 795 Pfam families. The remaining families either (i) belong to viral proteins that were excluded from AFDB or (ii) do not adopt globular 3D structures. Our structure-aware domain delineation uncovered a considerable fraction (15%) of Pfam domains containing multiple structural and evolutionary units and refined the boundaries for over half. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Pfam and corresponding DPAM-AI domains are at http://prodata.swmed.edu/DPAM-pfam/. Our code is deposited at https://github.com/Jsauce5p/DPAM/tree/dpam_ai, and updates will be released through https://github.com/CongLabCode/DPAM.

Protein structure prediction has now been deployed widely across several different large protein sets. Large-scale domain annotation of these predictions can aid in the development of biological insights. Using our Evolutionary Classification of Protein Domains (ECOD) from experimental structures as a basis for classification, we describe the detection and cataloging of domains from 48 whole proteomes deposited in the AlphaFold Database. On average, we can provide positive classification (either of domains or other identifiable non-domain regions) for 90% of residues in all proteomes. We classified 746,349 domains from 536,808 proteins comprised of over 226,424,000 amino acid residues. We examine the varying populations of homologous groups in both eukaryotes and bacteria. In addition to containing a higher fraction of disordered regions and unassigned domains, eukaryotes show a higher proportion of repeated proteins, both globular and small repeats. We enumerate those highly populated domains that are shared in both eukaryotes and bacteria, such as the Rossmann domains, TIM barrels, and P-loop domains. Additionally, we compare the sampling of homologous groups from this whole proteome set against our stable ECOD reference and discuss groups that have been enriched by structure predictions. Finally, we discuss the implication of these results for protein target selection for future classification strategies for very large protein sets.

MOTIVATION: Recent development of deep-learning methods has led to a breakthrough in the prediction accuracy of 3D protein structures. Extending these methods to protein pairs is expected to allow large-scale detection of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and modeling protein complexes at the proteome level. RESULTS: We applied RoseTTAFold and AlphaFold, two of the latest deep-learning methods for structure predictions, to analyze coevolution of human proteins residing in mitochondria, an organelle of vital importance in many cellular processes including energy production, metabolism, cell death and antiviral response. Variations in mitochondrial proteins have been linked to a plethora of human diseases and genetic conditions. RoseTTAFold, with high computational speed, was used to predict the coevolution of about 95% of mitochondrial protein pairs. Top-ranked pairs were further subject to modeling of the complex structures by AlphaFold, which also produced contact probability with high precision and in many cases consistent with RoseTTAFold. Most top-ranked pairs with high contact probability were supported by known PPIs and/or similarities to experimental structural complexes. For high-scoring pairs without experimental complex structures, our coevolution analyses and structural models shed light on the details of their interfaces, including CHCHD4-AIFM1, MTERF3-TRUB2, FMC1-ATPAF2 and ECSIT-NDUFAF1. We also identified novel PPIs (PYURF-NDUFAF5, LYRM1-MTRF1L and COA8-COX10) for several proteins without experimentally characterized interaction partners, leading to predictions of their molecular functions and the biological processes they are involved in. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Data of mitochondrial proteins and their interactions are available at: http://conglab.swmed.edu/mitochondria. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.