Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Edward Clark
dblp:05/3673
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4Theory of computation · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction › protein classification
GPCR classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Optimizing amino acid groupings for GPCR classification · Bioinform. 2008 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction
protein classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Optimizing amino acid groupings for GPCR classification · Bioinform. 2008 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence comparison
alignment-free sequence analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Optimizing amino acid groupings for GPCR classification · Bioinform. 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
optimization · 0.1artificial immune system · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Maximizing the Adjacent Possible in Automata ChemistriesabstractAutomata chemistries are good vehicles for experimentation in open-ended evolution, but they are by necessity complex systems whose low-level properties require careful design. To aid the process of designing automata chemistries, we develop an abstract model that classifies the features of a chemistry from a physical (bottom up) perspective and from a biological (top down) perspective. There are two levels: things that can evolve, and things that cannot. We equate the evolving level with biology and the non-evolving level with physics. We design our initial organisms in the biology, so they can evolve. We design the physics to facilitate evolvable biologies. This architecture leads to a set of design principles that should be observed when creating an instantiation of the architecture. These principles are Everything Evolves, Everything's Soft, and Everything Dies. To evaluate these ideas, we present experiments in the recently developed Stringmol automata chemistry. We examine the properties of Stringmol with respect to the principles, and so demonstrate the usefulness of the principles in designing automata chemistries. Simon J. Hickinbotham, Edward Clark, Adam Nellis, Susan Stepney, Tim Clarke, Peter Young 0002 |
Artif. Life | 2 |
| 2016 | Open-Ended Evolution: Perspectives from the OEE Workshop in YorkabstractWe describe the content and outcomes of the First Workshop on Open-Ended Evolution: Recent Progress and Future Milestones (OEE1), held during the ECAL 2015 conference at the University of York, UK, in July 2015. We briefly summarize the content of the workshop's talks, and identify the main themes that emerged from the open discussions. Two important conclusions from the discussions are: (1) the idea of pluralism about OEE-it seems clear that there is more than one interesting and important kind of OEE; and (2) the importance of distinguishing observable behavioral hallmarks of systems undergoing OEE from hypothesized underlying mechanisms that explain why a system exhibits those hallmarks. We summarize the different hallmarks and mechanisms discussed during the workshop, and list the specific systems that were highlighted with respect to particular hallmarks and mechanisms. We conclude by identifying some of the most important open research questions about OEE that are apparent in light of the discussions. The York workshop provides a foundation for a follow-up OEE2 workshop taking place at the ALIFE XV conference in Cancún, Mexico, in July 2016. Additional materials from the York workshop, including talk abstracts, presentation slides, and videos of each talk, are available at http://alife.org/ws/oee1 . Timothy J. Taylor 0001, Mark A. Bedau, Alastair Channon, David H. Ackley, Wolfgang Banzhaf, Guillaume Beslon, Emily L. Dolson, Tom Froese, Simon J. Hickinbotham, Takashi Ikegami, Barry McMullin, Norman H. Packard, Steen Rasmussen, Nathaniel Virgo, Eran Agmon, Edward Clark, Simon McGregor, Charles Ofria, Glen E. P. Ropella, Lee Spector, Kenneth O. Stanley, Adam Stanton, Christopher Steven Timperley, Anya E. Vostinar, Michael J. Wiser |
Artif. Life | 16 |
| 2010 | Diversity from a Monoculture - Effects of Mutation-on-Copy in a String-Based Artificial Chemistry
Simon J. Hickinbotham, Edward Clark, Susan Stepney, Tim Clarke, Adam Nellis, Mungo Pay, Peter Young 0002 |
ALIFE | 2 |
| 2009 | Gene regulation in a particle metabolomeabstractThe bacterial genome is well understood by biologists. Although its efficiency and adaptability should make it a good model for evolutionary algorithms, the bacterial genome is tightly coupled with the components of the bacterial metabolism, referred to here as the metabolome. This paper explores an approach to modelling an artificial bacterial metabolome in an efficient and modular manner, so that analogues of bacterial genome organisation and gene regulation can be implemented in evolutionary algorithms. We propose a particulate model of bacterial metabolic pathways in which the constituents drift in a fixed, limited space and obey a limited set of biologically plausible reaction rules. The potential of this model is demonstrated by creating a network that is capable of appropriate behavioural switching that can be observed in bacteria. Simon J. Hickinbotham, Edward Clark, Susan Stepney, Tim Clarke, Peter Young 0002 |
IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation | 2 |
| 2008 | Immune Systems and Computation: An Interdisciplinary Adventure
Jonathan Timmis, Paul S. Andrews, Nick D. L. Owens, Edward Clark |
UC | 4 |
| 2008 | Optimizing amino acid groupings for GPCR classificationabstractMOTIVATION: There is much interest in reducing the complexity inherent in the representation of the 20 standard amino acids within bioinformatics algorithms by developing a so-called reduced alphabet. Although there is no universally applicable residue grouping, there are numerous physiochemical criteria upon which one can base groupings. Local descriptors are a form of alignment-free analysis, the efficiency of which is dependent upon the correct selection of amino acid groupings. RESULTS: Within the context of G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) classification, an optimization algorithm was developed, which was able to identify the most efficient grouping when used to generate local descriptors. The algorithm was inspired by the relatively new computational intelligence paradigm of artificial immune systems. A number of amino acid groupings produced by this algorithm were evaluated with respect to their ability to generate local descriptors capable of providing an accurate classification algorithm for GPCRs. Matthew N. Davies, Andrew Secker, Alex Alves Freitas, Edward Clark, Jonathan Timmis, Darren R. Flower |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2008 | Theoretical advances in artificial immune systems
Jonathan Timmis, Andrew Hone, Thomas Stibor, Edward Clark |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 4 |