Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jean-Marc Piveteau

dblp:05/3900 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 22% Authentication and access control · 22% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 22%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Authentication and access control › anonymous credentials
anonymity revocation
0.011996
An Efficient Fair Payment System · CCS 1996
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security
fair payment
0.011996
An Efficient Fair Payment System · CCS 1996
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure computation protocols › setup assumptions
trusted third party
0.011996
An Efficient Fair Payment System · CCS 1996
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures
blind signatures
0.011995
Fair Blind Signatures · EUROCRYPT 1995
Privacy and data protection › anonymity
anonymous payment
0.011996
An Efficient Fair Payment System · CCS 1996
Privacy and data protection › anonymity
traceable anonymity
0.011996
An Efficient Fair Payment System · CCS 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cryptographic protocol design · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 An Efficient Fair Payment System
abstract
Many proposed payment systems allow the payer to remain anonymous during a transaction.However, this unconditional privacy protection could be misused by criminals, e.g. for blackmailing or money laundering.With a fair payment system, anonymous payments are still possible, but the anonymity can be removed with the help of a trusted party which need not be involved in the transaction itself.In this paper, we present an efficient fair payment system and we discuss its security.
Jan Camenisch, Jean-Marc Piveteau, Markus Stadler
CCS2
1995 Fair Blind Signatures
Markus Stadler, Jean-Marc Piveteau, Jan Camenisch
EUROCRYPT2
1994 An Efficient Electronic Payment System Protecting Privacy
Jan Camenisch, Jean-Marc Piveteau, Markus Stadler
ESORICS2