Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Samer Qutub
dblp:05/445
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Multi-agent systems · 87% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-robot coordination |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Operating a large fleet of mobile robots using the plan-merging paradigm · ICRA 1997 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
task allocation |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Operating a large fleet of mobile robots using the plan-merging paradigm · ICRA 1997 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › multi-agent planning
distributed planning |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Operating a large fleet of mobile robots using the plan-merging paradigm · ICRA 1997 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
plan-merging paradigm · 0.0hierarchical planning · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | A Scheme for Coordinating Multi-robots Planning Activities and Plans Execution
Rachid Alami 0001, Félix Ingrand, Samer Qutub |
ECAI | 3 |
| 1997 | Operating a large fleet of mobile robots using the plan-merging paradigmabstractWe present and discuss the use of a generic scheme for multi-robot cooperation called the "plan-merging paradigm" for managing a large fleet of autonomous mobile robots. Each robot, autonomously and incrementally builds and executes its own plans taking into account the multi-robot context obtained by collecting the current plans and goals of the other robots. We describe the overall system architecture and discuss the properties of our cooperative scheme. We show how the plan-merging paradigm (PMP) can be used in a hierarchical manner and how it "fills the gap" between centralized planning and distributed execution. We finally illustrate this scheme through an implemented system which allows a fleet of autonomous mobile robots to perform load transfer tasks in a route network environment. The central activity is limited to task allocation and important gains are obtained in system flexibility and robustness to execution contingencies. Simulations (using up to 30 robots) as well as experiments with real robots (3) are presented and discussed. Rachid Alami 0001, Sara Fleury, Matthieu Herrb, Félix Ingrand, Samer Qutub |
ICRA | 5 |
| 1997 | How to solve deadlock situations within the plan-merging paradigm for multi-robot cooperationabstractOur approach in proposing the plan-merging paradigm as a cooperation scheme was to allow an efficient distribution of the decisions for a better reactivity to contingencies for multi-robot applications with loosely coupled tasks. The paradigm proved to be quite efficient because it exploits the fact that most conflicts can be solved locally and because it allows a finer overlapping between plan refinement, plan coordination and execution. We develop in this paper the mechanisms which allow one to extend this paradigm in order to obtain a scheme which distributes as much as possible the decision processes for planning and coordination while maintaining two key features: the coherence of the global system and the ability to detect the situations where it is not applicable; and a localized management of the planning and coordination processes with, in particularly intricate situations, a progressive transition to more global schemes which may "degrade" to a unique and centralized planning activity. Samer Qutub, Rachid Alami 0001, Félix Ingrand |
IROS | 1 |