Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel Marcu

dblp:05/5326 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
70ranked-venue papers
14as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 66 · 13 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
34 papers
Machine translation · 40% Information extraction and text analysis · 18% Language models and text generation · 17%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers
Information retrieval · 77% Knowledge graphs · 12% Data integration and cleaning · 12%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Learning and educational technologies · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 94% Medical and health informatics · 6%

Topics — the 30 heaviest of 60, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
syntax-based machine translation
0.552015
Parsing English into Abstract Meaning Representation Using Syntax-Based Machine Translation · EMNLP 2015
Binarizing Syntax Trees to Improve Syntax-Based Machine Translation Accuracy · EMNLP-CoNLL 2007
What Can Syntax-Based MT Learn from Phrase-Based MT? · EMNLP-CoNLL 2007
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › conversational agents
conversational assistant
0.412020
Straddling the Boundary between Contribution and Solution Driven Science · KDD 2020
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation
0.472011
Feature-Rich Language-Independent Syntax-Based Alignment for Statistical Machine Translation · EMNLP 2011
SPMT: Statistical Machine Translation with Syntactified Target Language Phrases · EMNLP 2006
Scalable Inference and Training of Context-Rich Syntactic Translation Models · ACL 2006
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
word alignment
0.442011
Feature-Rich Language-Independent Syntax-Based Alignment for Statistical Machine Translation · EMNLP 2011
Hierarchical Search for Word Alignment · ACL 2010
Getting the Structure Right for Word Alignment: LEAF · EMNLP-CoNLL 2007
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene understanding
0.312018
Learning Interpretable Spatial Operations in a Rich 3D Blocks World · AAAI 2018
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction following
0.312018
Learning Interpretable Spatial Operations in a Rich 3D Blocks World · AAAI 2018
Learning and educational technologies › learning analytics
student performance prediction
0.312017
Progressive Prediction of Student Performance in College Programs · AAAI 2017
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction
0.212016
Extracting Biomolecular Interactions Using Semantic Parsing of Biomedical Text · AAAI 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomedical text mining
0.212016
Extracting Biomolecular Interactions Using Semantic Parsing of Biomedical Text · AAAI 2016
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
abstract meaning representation parsing
0.212015
Parsing English into Abstract Meaning Representation Using Syntax-Based Machine Translation · EMNLP 2015
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing
0.212015
Parsing English into Abstract Meaning Representation Using Syntax-Based Machine Translation · EMNLP 2015
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › syntax-based machine translation
string-to-tree translation
0.212015
Parsing English into Abstract Meaning Representation Using Syntax-Based Machine Translation · EMNLP 2015
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
surface realisation
0.122006
Stochastic Language Generation Using WIDL-Expressions and its Application in Machine Translation and Summarization · ACL 2006
Towards Developing Generation Algorithms for Text-to-Text Applications · ACL 2005
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation
0.122006
Stochastic Language Generation Using WIDL-Expressions and its Application in Machine Translation and Summarization · ACL 2006
Towards Developing Generation Algorithms for Text-to-Text Applications · ACL 2005
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
hierarchical search
0.112010
Hierarchical Search for Word Alignment · ACL 2010
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › parallel corpora
sentence alignment
0.112010
Hierarchical Search for Word Alignment · ACL 2010
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
phrase-based translation
0.122007
What Can Syntax-Based MT Learn from Phrase-Based MT? · EMNLP-CoNLL 2007
A Phrase-Based, Joint Probability Model for Statistical Machine Translation · EMNLP 2002
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
spatial reasoning
0.112018
Learning Interpretable Spatial Operations in a Rich 3D Blocks World · AAAI 2018
Information retrieval
text summarization
0.122006
Stochastic Language Generation Using WIDL-Expressions and its Application in Machine Translation and Summarization · ACL 2006
The Automatic Construction of Large-Scale Corpora for Summarization Research · SIGIR 1999
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
decoding
0.122004
Fast and optimal decoding for machine translation · Artif. Intell. 2004
Fast Decoding and Optimal Decoding for Machine Translation · ACL 2001
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis
discourse parsing
0.132002
An Unsupervised Approach to Recognizing Discourse Relations · ACL 2002
A Decision-Based Approach to Rhetorical Parsing · ACL 1999
The Rhetorical Parsing of Natural Language Texts · ACL 1997
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
abstract meaning representation
0.112016
Extracting Biomolecular Interactions Using Semantic Parsing of Biomedical Text · AAAI 2016
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
semantic representation
0.112016
Extracting Biomolecular Interactions Using Semantic Parsing of Biomedical Text · AAAI 2016
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization
0.122002
Summarization beyond sentence extraction: A probabilistic approach to sentence compression · Artif. Intell. 2002
A Noisy-Channel Model for Document Compression · ACL 2002
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
discourse generation
0.112006
Discourse Generation Using Utility-Trained Coherence Models · ACL 2006
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
stochastic generation
0.112006
Stochastic Language Generation Using WIDL-Expressions and its Application in Machine Translation and Summarization · ACL 2006
Information retrieval › text summarization
headline generation
0.112006
Stochastic Language Generation Using WIDL-Expressions and its Application in Machine Translation and Summarization · ACL 2006
Information retrieval › query reformulation
query expansion
0.112006
Bayesian Query-Focused Summarization · ACL 2006
Information retrieval › text summarization
query-focused summarization
0.112006
Bayesian Query-Focused Summarization · ACL 2006
Information retrieval › text summarization › extractive summarization
sentence selection
0.112006
Bayesian Query-Focused Summarization · ACL 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semantic parsing · 0.5graph kernel learning · 0.5dependency structure · 0.5AMR · 0.5machine learning · 0.4neural architecture · 0.3ensemble learning · 0.3domain knowledge · 0.3syntax-based machine translation · 0.2language model · 0.2syntax-based alignment · 0.1feature-rich alignment · 0.1probabilistic language model · 0.1language modeling · 0.1interpolation · 0.1bayesian inference · 0.1approximate inference · 0.1markov chain monte carlo · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Straddling the Boundary between Contribution and Solution Driven Science
abstract
Advancing the state of the art in the context of products and services used by hundreds of millions of customers poses challenges that go beyond those associated with advancing the state of the art in customer-free settings. In this talk, I will highlight some of these challenges and discuss approaches to overcoming them in the context of two Amazon services: Amazon Translate and Alexa.
Daniel Marcu
KDD1
2018 Learning Interpretable Spatial Operations in a Rich 3D Blocks World
abstract
In this paper, we study the problem of mapping natural language instructions to complex spatial actions in a 3D blocks world. We first introduce a new dataset that pairs complex 3D spatial operations to rich natural language descriptions that require complex spatial and pragmatic interpretations such as “mirroring”, “twisting”, and “balancing”. This dataset, built on the simulation environment of Bisk, Yuret, and Marcu (2016), attains language that is significantly richer and more complex, while also doubling the size of the original dataset in the 2D environment with 100 new world configurations and 250,000 tokens. In addition, we propose a new neural architecture that achieves competitive results while automatically discovering an inventory of interpretable spatial operations (Figure 5).
Yonatan Bisk, Kevin J. Shih, Yejin Choi 0001, Daniel Marcu
AAAI4
2018 Incident-Driven Machine Translation and Name Tagging for Low-resource Languages
Ulf Hermjakob, Daniel Marcu, Jonathan May, Sabrina J. Mielke, Nima Pourdamghani, Michael Pust, Kevin Knight, Tomer Levinboim, Kenton Murray, David Chiang 0001, Boliang Zhang, Xiaoman Pan, Di Lu 0003, Heng Ji 0001
Mach. Transl.3
2017 Progressive Prediction of Student Performance in College Programs
abstract
Accurately predicting students' future performance based on their tracked academic records in college programs is crucial for effectively carrying out necessary pedagogical interventions to ensure students' on-time graduation. Although there is a rich literature on predicting student performance in solving problems and studying courses using data-driven approaches, predicting student performance in completing college programs is much less studied and faces new challenges, mainly due to the diversity of courses selected by students and the requirement of continuous tracking and incorporation of students' evolving progresses. In this paper, we develop a novel algorithm that enables progressive prediction of students' performance by adapting ensemble learning techniques and utilizing education-specific domain knowledge. We prove its prediction performance guarantee and show its performance improvement against benchmark algorithms on a real-world student dataset from UCLA.
Jie Xu 0001, Yuli Han, Daniel Marcu, Mihaela van der Schaar
AAAI3
2016 Extracting Biomolecular Interactions Using Semantic Parsing of Biomedical Text
abstract
We advance the state of the art in biomolecular interaction extraction with three contributions: (i) We show that deep, Abstract Meaning Representations (AMR) significantly improve the accuracy of a biomolecular interaction extraction system when compared to a baseline that relies solely on surface- and syntax-based features; (ii) In contrast with previous approaches that infer relations on a sentence-by-sentence basis, we expand our framework to enable consistent predictions over sets of sentences (documents); (iii) We further modify and expand a graph kernel learning framework to enable concurrent exploitation of automatically induced AMR (semantic) and dependency structure (syntactic) representations. Our experiments show that our approach yields interaction extraction systems that are more robust in environments where there is a significant mismatch between training and test conditions.
Sahil Garg, Aram Galstyan, Ulf Hermjakob, Daniel Marcu
AAAI4
2016 Extracting Structured Scholarly Information from the Machine Translation Literature
Eunsol Choi, Matic Horvat, Jonathan May, Kevin Knight, Daniel Marcu
LREC5
2016 Natural Language Communication with Robots
abstract
We propose a framework for devising empirically testable algorithms for bridging the communication gap between humans and robots.We instantiate our framework in the context of a problem setting in which humans give instructions to robots using unrestricted natural language commands, with instruction sequences being subservient to building complex goal configurations in a blocks world.We show how one can collect meaningful training data and we propose three neural architectures for interpreting contextually grounded natural language commands.The proposed architectures allow us to correctly understand/ground the blocks that the robot should move when instructed by a human who uses unrestricted language.The architectures have more difficulty in correctly understanding/grounding the spatial relations required to place blocks correctly, especially when the blocks are not easily identifiable.
Yonatan Bisk, Deniz Yuret, Daniel Marcu
HLT-NAACL3
2016 Name Tagging for Low-resource Incident Languages based on Expectation-driven Learning
abstract
Boliang Zhang, Xiaoman Pan, Tianlu Wang, Ashish Vaswani, Heng Ji, Kevin Knight, Daniel Marcu. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2016.
Boliang Zhang, Xiaoman Pan, Ashish Vaswani, Heng Ji 0001, Kevin Knight, Daniel Marcu
HLT-NAACL7
2015 Parsing English into Abstract Meaning Representation Using Syntax-Based Machine Translation
abstract
We present a parser for Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR).We treat Englishto-AMR conversion within the framework of string-to-tree, syntax-based machine translation (SBMT).To make this work, we transform the AMR structure into a form suitable for the mechanics of SBMT and useful for modeling.We introduce an AMR-specific language model and add data and features drawn from semantic resources.Our resulting AMR parser significantly improves upon state-of-the-art results.
Michael Pust, Ulf Hermjakob, Kevin Knight, Daniel Marcu, Jonathan May
EMNLP4
2015 Building and Using a Knowledge Graph to Combat Human Trafficking
Pedro A. Szekely, Craig A. Knoblock, Jason Slepicka, Andrew Philpot, Chengye Yin, Dipsy Kapoor, Premkumar Natarajan, Daniel Marcu, Kevin Knight, David Stallard, Subessware S. Karunamoorthy, Rajagopal Bojanapalli, Steven Minton, Brian Amanatullah, Todd Hughes, Mike Tamayo, David Flynt, Rachel Artiss, Shih-Fu Chang, Tao Chen 0015, Gerald Hiebel, Lidia Silva Ferreira
ISWC (2)9
2012 HyTER: Meaning-Equivalent Semantics for Translation Evaluation
Markus Dreyer, Daniel Marcu
HLT-NAACL2
2012 Automatic Parallel Fragment Extraction from Noisy Data
Jason Riesa, Daniel Marcu
HLT-NAACL2
2011 Feature-Rich Language-Independent Syntax-Based Alignment for Statistical Machine Translation
Jason Riesa, Ann Irvine, Daniel Marcu
EMNLP3
2010 Hierarchical Search for Word Alignment
Jason Riesa, Daniel Marcu
ACL2
2010 Re-structuring, Re-labeling, and Re-aligning for Syntax-Based Machine Translation
abstract
This article shows that the structure of bilingual material from standard parsing and alignment tools is not optimal for training syntax-based statistical machine translation (SMT) systems. We present three modifications to the MT training data to improve the accuracy of a state-of-the-art syntax MT system: re-structuring changes the syntactic structure of training parse trees to enable reuse of substructures; re-labeling alters bracket labels to enrich rule application context; and re-aligning unifies word alignment across sentences to remove bad word alignments and refine good ones. Better structures, labels, and word alignments are learned by the EM algorithm. We show that each individual technique leads to improvement as measured by BLEU, and we also show that the greatest improvement is achieved by combining them. We report an overall 1.48 BLEU improvement on the NIST08 evaluation set over a strong baseline in Chinese/English translation.
Wei Wang 0006, Jonathan May, Kevin Knight, Daniel Marcu
Comput. Linguistics4
2009 Search-based structured prediction
Hal Daumé III, John Langford 0001, Daniel Marcu
Mach. Learn.3
2007 What Can Syntax-Based MT Learn from Phrase-Based MT?
Steve DeNeefe, Kevin Knight, Wei Wang 0006, Daniel Marcu
EMNLP-CoNLL4
2007 Getting the Structure Right for Word Alignment: LEAF
Alexander Fraser 0001, Daniel Marcu
EMNLP-CoNLL2
2007 Binarizing Syntax Trees to Improve Syntax-Based Machine Translation Accuracy
Wei Wang 0006, Kevin Knight, Daniel Marcu
EMNLP-CoNLL3
2007 Measuring Word Alignment Quality for Statistical Machine Translation
abstract
Automatic word alignment plays a critical role in statistical machine translation. Unfortunately, the relationship between alignment quality and statistical machine translation performance has not been well understood. In the recent literature, the alignment task has frequently been decoupled from the translation task and assumptions have been made about measuring alignment quality for machine translation which, it turns out, are not justified. In particular, none of the tens of papers published over the last five years has shown that significant decreases in alignment error rate (AER) result in significant increases in translation performance. This paper explains this state of affairs and presents steps towards measuring alignment quality in a way which is predictive of statistical machine translation performance.
Alexander Fraser 0001, Daniel Marcu
Comput. Linguistics2
2007 Abstractive headline generation using WIDL-expressions
Radu Soricut, Daniel Marcu
Inf. Process. Manag.2
2006 Bayesian Query-Focused Summarization
abstract
We present BAYESUM (for "Bayesian summarization"), a model for sentence extraction in query-focused summarization.BAYESUM leverages the common case in which multiple documents are relevant to a single query.Using these documents as reinforcement for query terms, BAYESUM is not afflicted by the paucity of information in short queries.We show that approximate inference in BAYESUM is possible on large data sets and results in a stateof-the-art summarization system.Furthermore, we show how BAYESUM can be understood as a justified query expansion technique in the language modeling for IR framework.
Hal Daumé III, Daniel Marcu
ACL2
2006 Semi-Supervised Training for Statistical Word Alignment
abstract
We introduce a semi-supervised approach to training for statistical machine translation that alternates the traditional Expectation Maximization step that is applied on a large training corpus with a discriminative step aimed at increasing word-alignment quality on a small, manually word-aligned sub-corpus. We show that our algorithm leads not only to improved alignments but also to machine translation outputs of higher quality.
Alexander Fraser 0001, Daniel Marcu
ACL2
2006 Scalable Inference and Training of Context-Rich Syntactic Translation Models
abstract
Statistical MT has made great progress in the last few years, but current translation models are weak on re-ordering and target language fluency. Syntactic approaches seek to remedy these problems. In this paper, we take the framework for acquiring multi-level syntactic translation rules of (Galley et al., 2004) from aligned tree-string pairs, and present two main extensions of their approach: first, instead of merely computing a single derivation that minimally explains a sentence pair, we construct a large number of derivations that include contextually richer rules, and account for multiple interpretations of unaligned words. Second, we propose probability estimates and a training procedure for weighting these rules. We contrast different approaches on real examples, show that our estimates based on multiple derivations favor phrasal re-orderings that are linguistically better motivated, and establish that our larger rules provide a 3.63 BLEU point increase over minimal rules.
Michel Galley, Jonathan Graehl, Kevin Knight, Daniel Marcu, Steve DeNeefe, Wei Wang 0006, Ignacio Thayer
ACL4
2006 Extracting Parallel Sub-Sentential Fragments from Non-Parallel Corpora
abstract
We present a novel method for extracting parallel sub-sentential fragments from comparable, non-parallel bilingual corpora. By analyzing potentially similar sentence pairs using a signal processing-inspired approach, we detect which segments of the source sentence are translated into segments in the target sentence, and which are not. This method enables us to extract useful machine translation training data even from very non-parallel corpora, which contain no parallel sentence pairs. We evaluate the quality of the extracted data by showing that it improves the performance of a state-of-the-art statistical machine translation system.
Dragos Stefan Munteanu, Daniel Marcu
ACL2
2006 Stochastic Language Generation Using WIDL-Expressions and its Application in Machine Translation and Summarization
abstract
We propose WIDL-expressions as a flexible formalism that facilitates the integration of a generic sentence realization system within end-to-end language processing applications. WIDL-expressions represent compactly probability distributions over finite sets of candidate realizations, and have optimal algorithms for realization via interpolation with language model probability distributions. We show the effectiveness of a WIDL-based NLG system in two sentence realization tasks: automatic translation and headline generation.
Radu Soricut, Daniel Marcu
ACL2
2006 Discourse Generation Using Utility-Trained Coherence Models
Radu Soricut, Daniel Marcu
ACL2
2006 Unsupervised Learning of Verb Argument Structures
Thiago A. S. Pardo, Daniel Marcu, Maria das Graças Volpe Nunes
CICLing2
2006 SPMT: Statistical Machine Translation with Syntactified Target Language Phrases
Daniel Marcu, Wei Wang 0006, Abdessamad Echihabi, Kevin Knight
EMNLP1
2006 Building an English-iraqi Arabic machine translation system for spoken utterances with limited resources
abstract
This paper presents an English-Iraqi Arabic speech-to-speech statistical machine translation system using limited resources. In it, we explore the constraints involved, how we endeavored to mitigate such problems as a non-standard orthography and a highly inflected grammar, and discuss leveraging existing plentiful resources for Modern Standard Arabic to assist in this task. These combined techniques yield a reduction in unknown words at translation time by over 40 % and a +3.65 increase in BLEU score over a previous state-of-the-art system using the same parallel training corpus of spoken utterances. Index Terms: speech translation, limited resources, Arabic 1.
Jason Riesa, Behrang Mohit, Kevin Knight, Daniel Marcu
INTERSPEECH4
2006 Capitalizing Machine Translation
Wei Wang 0006, Kevin Knight, Daniel Marcu
HLT-NAACL3
2006 Domain Adaptation for Statistical Classifiers
abstract
The most basic assumption used in statistical learning theory is that training data and test data are drawn from the same underlying distribution. Unfortunately, in many applications, the "in-domain" test data is drawn from a distribution that is related, but not identical, to the "out-of-domain" distribution of the training data. We consider the common case in which labeled out-of-domain data is plentiful, but labeled in-domain data is scarce. We introduce a statistical formulation of this problem in terms of a simple mixture model and present an instantiation of this framework to maximum entropy classifiers and their linear chain counterparts. We present efficient inference algorithms for this special case based on the technique of conditional expectation maximization. Our experimental results show that our approach leads to improved performance on three real world tasks on four different data sets from the natural language processing domain.
Hal Daumé III, Daniel Marcu
J. Artif. Intell. Res.2
2005 Transonics: A Practical Speech-to-Speech Translator for English-Farsi Medical Dialogs
Robert S. Belvin, Emil Ettelaie, Sudeep Gandhe, Panayiotis G. Georgiou, Kevin Knight, Daniel Marcu, Scott Millward, Shri Narayanan, Howard Neely, David R. Traum
ACL6
2005 Towards Developing Generation Algorithms for Text-to-Text Applications
abstract
We describe a new sentence realization framework for text-to-text applications. This framework uses IDL-expressions as a representation formalism, and a generation mechanism based on algorithms for intersecting IDL-expressions with probabilistic language models. We present both theoretical and empirical results concerning the correctness and efficiency of these algorithms.
Radu Soricut, Daniel Marcu
ACL2
2005 Towards Developing Probabilistic Generative Models for Reasoning with Natural Language Representations
Daniel Marcu, Ana-Maria Popescu
CICLing1
2005 Machine translation in the year 2004
abstract
Machine translation (MT) accuracy has recently increased, due to better techniques and to the availability of larger parallel training sets. Statistical MT systems are now able to translate across a wide variety of language pairs. This paper covers the basic elements of state-of-the-art, statistical MT, including modeling, decoding, evaluation, and data preparation.
Kevin Knight, Daniel Marcu
ICASSP (5)2
2005 Learning as search optimization: approximate large margin methods for structured prediction
abstract
Mappings to structured output spaces (strings, trees, partitions, etc.) are typically learned using extensions of classification algorithms to simple graphical structures (eg., linear chains) in which search and parameter estimation can be performed exactly. Unfortunately, in many complex problems, it is rare that exact search or parameter estimation is tractable. Instead of learning exact models and searching via heuristic means, we embrace this difficulty and treat the structured output problem in terms of approximate search. We present a framework for learning as search optimization, and two parameter updates with convergence the-orems and bounds. Empirical evidence shows that our integrated approach to learning and decoding can outperform exact models at smaller computational cost.
Hal Daumé III, Daniel Marcu
ICML2
2005 Induction of Word and Phrase Alignments for Automatic Document Summarization
abstract
Current research in automatic single-document summarization is dominated by two effective, yet naïve approaches: summarization by sentence extraction and headline generation via bagof-words models. While successful in some tasks, neither of these models is able to adequately capture the large set of linguistic devices utilized by humans when they produce summaries. One possible explanation for the widespread use of these models is that good techniques have been developed to extract appropriate training data for them from existing document/abstract and document/ headline corpora. We believe that future progress in automatic summarization will be driven both by the development of more sophisticated, linguistically informed models, as well as a more effective leveraging of document/abstract corpora. In order to open the doors to simultaneously achieving both of these goals, we have developed techniques for automatically producing word-to-word and phrase-to-phrase alignments between documents and their human-written abstracts. These alignments make explicit the correspondences that exist in such document/abstract pairs and create a potentially rich data source from which complex summarization algorithms may learn. This paper describes experiments we have carried out to analyze the ability of humans to perform such alignments, and based on these analyses, we describe experiments for creating them automatically. Our model for the alignment task is based on an extension of the standard hidden Markov model and learns to create alignments in a completely unsupervised fashion. We describe our model in detail and present experimental results that show that our model is able to learn to reliably identify word- and phrase-level alignments in a corpus of (document, abstract) pairs.
Hal Daumé III, Daniel Marcu
Comput. Linguistics2
2005 Improving Machine Translation Performance by Exploiting Non-Parallel Corpora
abstract
We present a novel method for discovering parallel sentences in comparable, non-parallel corpora. We train a maximum entropy classifier that, given a pair of sentences, can reliably determine whether or not they are translations of each other. Using this approach, we extract parallel data from large Chinese, Arabic, and English non-parallel newspaper corpora. We evaluate the quality of the extracted data by showing that it improves the performance of a state-of-the-art statistical machine translation system. We also show that a good-quality MT system can be built from scratch by starting with a very small parallel corpus (100,000 words) and exploiting a large non-parallel corpus. Thus, our method can be applied with great benefit to language pairs for which only scarce resources are available.
Dragos Stefan Munteanu, Daniel Marcu
Comput. Linguistics2
2005 A Bayesian Model for Supervised Clustering with the Dirichlet Process Prior
abstract
We develop a Bayesian framework for tackling the supervised clustering problem, the generic problem encountered in tasks such as reference matching, coreference resolution, identity uncertainty and record linkage. Our clustering model is based on the Dirichlet process prior, which enables us to define distributions over the countably infinite sets that naturally arise in this problem. We add supervision to our model by positing the existence of a set of unobserved random variables (we call these "reference types") that are generic across all clusters. Inference in our framework, which requires integrating over infinitely many parameters, is solved using Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques. We present algorithms for both conjugate and non-conjugate priors. We present a simple---but general---parameterization of our model based on a Gaussian assumption. We evaluate this model on one artificial task and three real-world tasks, comparing it against both unsupervised and state-of-the-art supervised algorithms. Our results show that our model is able to outperform other models across a variety of tasks and performance metrics.
Hal Daumé III, Daniel Marcu
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2004 A Phrase-Based HMM Approach to Document/Abstract Alignment
Hal Daumé III, Daniel Marcu
EMNLP2
2004 NP Bracketing by Maximum Entropy Tagging and SVM Reranking
Hal Daumé III, Daniel Marcu
EMNLP2
2004 What's in a translation rule?
Michel Galley, Mark Hopkins, Kevin Knight, Daniel Marcu
HLT-NAACL4
2004 Evaluating Multiple Aspects of Coherence in Student Essays
Derrick Higgins, Jill Burstein, Daniel Marcu, Claudia Gentile
HLT-NAACL3
2004 Improved Machine Translation Performance via Parallel Sentence Extraction from Comparable Corpora
Dragos Stefan Munteanu, Alexander Fraser 0001, Daniel Marcu
HLT-NAACL3
2004 Fast and optimal decoding for machine translation
Ulrich Germann, Michael Jahr, Kevin Knight, Daniel Marcu, Kenji Yamada
Artif. Intell.4
2003 A Noisy-Channel Approach to Question Answering
abstract
We introduce a probabilistic noisy-channel model for question answering and we show how it can be exploited in the context of an end-to-end QA system. Our noisy-channel system outperforms a state-of-the-art rule-based QA system that uses similar resources. We also show that the model we propose is flexible enough to accommodate within one mathematical framework many QA-specific resources and techniques, which range from the exploitation of WordNet, structured, and semi-structured databases to reasoning, and paraphrasing.
Abdessamad Echihabi, Daniel Marcu
ACL2
2003 Statistical Phrase-Based Translation
Philipp Koehn, Franz Josef Och, Daniel Marcu
HLT-NAACL3
2003 Cognates Can Improve Statistical Translation Models
Grzegorz Kondrak, Daniel Marcu, Kevin Knight
HLT-NAACL2
2003 Syntax-based Alignment of Multiple Translations: Extracting Paraphrases and Generating New Sentences
Bo Pang 0001, Kevin Knight, Daniel Marcu
HLT-NAACL3
2003 Sentence Level Discourse Parsing using Syntactic and Lexical Information
Radu Soricut, Daniel Marcu
HLT-NAACL2
2002 A Noisy-Channel Model for Document Compression
abstract
We present a document compression system that uses a hierarchical noisy-channel model of text production. Our compression system first automatically derives the syntactic structure of each sentence and the overall discourse structure of the text given as input. The system then uses a statistical hierarchical model of text production in order to drop non-important syntactic and discourse constituents so as to generate coherent, grammatical document compressions of arbitrary length. The system outperforms both a baseline and a sentence-based compression system that operates by simplifying sequentially all sentences in a text. Our results support the claim that discourse knowledge plays an important role in document summarization.
Hal Daumé III, Daniel Marcu
ACL2
2002 An Unsupervised Approach to Recognizing Discourse Relations
abstract
We present an unsupervised approach to recognizing discourse relations of CONTRAST, EXPLANATION-EVIDENCE, CONDITION and ELABORATION that hold between arbitrary spans of texts. We show that discourse relation classifiers trained on examples that are automatically extracted from massive amounts of text can be used to distinguish between some of these relations with accuracies as high as 93%, even when the relations are not explicitly marked by cue phrases.
Daniel Marcu, Abdessamad Echihabi
ACL1
2002 A Phrase-Based, Joint Probability Model for Statistical Machine Translation
abstract
We present a joint probability model for statistical machine translation, which automatically learns word and phrase equivalents from bilingual corpora. Translations produced with parameters estimated using the joint model are more accurate than translations produced using IBM Model 4.
Daniel Marcu
EMNLP1
2002 Processing Comparable Corpora With Bilingual Suffix Trees
abstract
We introduce Bilingual Suffix Trees (BST), a data structure that is suitable for exploiting comparable corpora. We discuss algorithms that use BSTs in order to create parallel corpora and learn translations of unseen words from comparable corpora. Starting with a small bilingual dictionary that was derived automatically from a corpus of 5.000 parallel sentences, we have automatically extracted a corpus of 33.926 parallel phrases of size greater than 3, and learned 9 new word translations from a comparable corpus of 1.3M words (100.000 sentences).
Dragos Stefan Munteanu, Daniel Marcu
EMNLP2
2002 The Importance of Lexicalized Syntax Models for Natural Language Generation Tasks
Hal Daumé III, Kevin Knight, Irene Langkilde-Geary, Daniel Marcu, Kenji Yamada
INLG4
2002 Summarization beyond sentence extraction: A probabilistic approach to sentence compression
Kevin Knight, Daniel Marcu
Artif. Intell.2
2002 Translation with Scarce Bilingual Resources
Yaser Al-Onaizan, Ulrich Germann, Ulf Hermjakob, Kevin Knight, Philipp Koehn, Daniel Marcu, Kenji Yamada
Mach. Transl.6
2001 Towards Automatic Classification of Discourse Elements in Essays
abstract
Educators are interested in essay evaluation systems that include feedback about writing features that can facilitate the essay revision process. For instance, if the thesis statement of a student's essay could be automatically identified, the student could then use this information to reflect on the thesis statement with regard to its quality, and its relationship to other discourse elements in the essay. Using a relatively small corpus of manually annotated data, we use Bayesian classification to identify thesis statements. This method yields results that are much closer to human performance than the results produced by two baseline systems.
Jill Burstein, Daniel Marcu, Slava Andreyev, Martin Chodorow
ACL2
2001 Fast Decoding and Optimal Decoding for Machine Translation
abstract
A good decoding algorithm is critical to the success of any statistical machine translation system. The decoder's job is to find the translation that is most likely according to set of previously learned parameters (and a formula for combining them). Since the space of possible translations is extremely large, typical decoding algorithms are only able to examine a portion of it, thus risking to miss good solutions. In this paper, we compare the speed and output quality of a traditional stack-based decoding algorithm with two new decoders: a fast greedy decoder and a slow but optimal decoder that treats decoding as an integer-programming optimization problem.
Ulrich Germann, Michael Jahr, Kevin Knight, Daniel Marcu, Kenji Yamada
ACL4
2001 Towards a Unified Approach to Memory- and Statistical-Based Machine Translation
abstract
We present a set of algorithms that enable us to translate natural language sentences by exploiting both a translation memory and a statistical-based translation model. Our results show that an automatically derived translation memory can be used within a statistical framework to often find translations of higher probability than those found using solely a statistical model. The translations produced using both the translation memory and the statistical model are significantly better than translations produced by two commercial systems: our hybrid system translated perfectly 58% of the 505 sentences in a test collection, while the commercial systems translated perfectly only 40-42% of them.
Daniel Marcu
ACL1
2000 An Empirical Investigation of the Relation Between Discourse Structure and Co-Reference
Dan Cristea, Nancy Ide, Daniel Marcu, Valentin Tablan
COLING3
2000 Extending a Formal and Computational Model of Rhetorical Structure Theory with Intentional Structures la Grosz and Sidner
Daniel Marcu
COLING1
2000 An empirical study of multilingual natural language generation: What Should a Text Planner Do?
abstract
We present discourse annotation work aimed at constructing a parallel corpus of Rhetorical Structure trees for a collection of Japanese texts and their corresponding English translations. We discuss implications of our empirical findings for the task of text planning in the context of implementing multilingual natural language generation systems.
Daniel Marcu, Lynn Carlson, Maki Watanabe
INLG1
2000 The Rhetorical Parsing of Unrestricted Texts: A Surface-Based Approach
abstract
Coherent texts are not just simple sequences of clauses and sentences, but rather complex artifacts that have highly elaborate rhetorical structure. This paper explores the extent to which well-formed rhetorical structures can be automatically derived by means of surface-form-based algorithms. These algorithms identify discourse usages of cue phrases and break sentences into clauses, hypothesize rhetorical relations that hold among textual units, and produce valid rhetorical structure trees for unrestricted natural language texts. The algorithms are empirically grounded in a corpus analysis of cue phrases and rely on a first-order formalization of rhetorical structure trees. The algorithms are evaluated both intrinsically and extrinsically. The intrinsic evaluation assesses the resemblance between automatically and manually constructed rhetorical structure trees. The extrinsic evaluation shows that automatically derived rhetorical structures can be successfully exploited in the context of text summarization.
Daniel Marcu
Comput. Linguistics1
1999 A Decision-Based Approach to Rhetorical Parsing
abstract
We present a shift-reduce rhetorical parsing algorithm that learns to construct rhetorical structures of texts from a corpus of discourse-parse action sequences. The algorithm exploits robust lexical, syntactic, and semantic knowledge sources.
Daniel Marcu
ACL1
1999 The Automatic Construction of Large-Scale Corpora for Summarization Research
abstract
Summarization research is notorious for its lack of adequate corpora: today, there exist only a few small collections of texts whose units have been manually annotated for textual importance. Given the cost and tediousness of the annotation process, it is very unlikely that we will ever manually annotate for textual importance sufficiently large corpora of texts. To circumvent this problem, we have developed an algorithm that constructs such corpora automatically. Our algorithm takes as input an hAbstract, Texti tuple and generates the corresponding Extract, i.e., the set of clauses (sentences) in the Text that were used to write the Abstract. The performance of the algorithm is shown to be close to that of humans by means of an empirical experiment. The experiment also suggests extraction strategies that could improve the performance of automatic summarization systems. 1 Introduction 1.1 Motivation All research on the automatic generation of generic abstracts assumes that the firs...
Daniel Marcu
SIGIR1
1997 The Rhetorical Parsing of Natural Language Texts
abstract
We derive the rhetorical structures of texts by means of two new, surface-form-based algorithms: one that identifies discourse usages of cue phrases and breaks sentences into clauses, and one that produces valid rhetorical structure trees for unrestricted natural languages texts. The algorithms use information that was derived from a corpus analysis of cue phrases.
Daniel Marcu
ACL1
1996 A Formal and Computational Characterization of Pragmatic Infelicities
Daniel Marcu, Graeme Hirst
ECAI1
1995 A Uniform Treatment of Pragmatic Inferences in Simple and Complex Utterances and Sequences of Utterances
abstract
Drawing appropriate defeasible inferences has been proven to be one of the most pervasive puzzles of natural language processing and a recurrent problem in pragmatics. This paper provides a theoretical framework, called stratified logic, that can accommodate defeasible pragmatic inferences. The framework yields an algorithm that computes the conversational, conventional, scalar, clausal, and normal state implicatures; and the presuppositions that are associated with utterances. The algorithm applies equally to simple and complex utterances and sequences of utterances.
Daniel Marcu, Graeme Hirst
ACL1