Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Karen B. Sarachik

dblp:05/6561 · also Karen Beth Sarachik · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Image recognition and object detection · 44% Learning theory · 27% Robot navigation and mapping · 17%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 50% Image and video processing · 50%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition
0.021997
The Effect of Gaussian Error in Object Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1997
Gaussian error models for object recognition · CVPR 1993
Machine learning › Learning theory
hypothesis testing
0.011997
The Effect of Gaussian Error in Object Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1997
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object recognition
model-based object recognition
0.011997
The Effect of Gaussian Error in Object Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1997
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
ROC analysis
0.011993
Gaussian error models for object recognition · CVPR 1993
Computer vision › 3D vision
stereo vision
0.021990
Dynamic World Modeling Using Vertical Line Stereo · ECCV 1990
Characterising an indoor environment with a mobile robot and uncalibrated stereo · ICRA 1989
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › environment mapping
indoor mapping
0.011989
Characterising an indoor environment with a mobile robot and uncalibrated stereo · ICRA 1989
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
localization
0.011989
Characterising an indoor environment with a mobile robot and uncalibrated stereo · ICRA 1989
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization
robot localization
0.011989
Characterising an indoor environment with a mobile robot and uncalibrated stereo · ICRA 1989
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
image analysis
0.011997
The Effect of Gaussian Error in Object Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1997
Image and video processing › image statistics › statistical image modeling
noise modeling
0.011997
The Effect of Gaussian Error in Object Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1997
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction
0.011990
Dynamic World Modeling Using Vertical Line Stereo · ECCV 1990
Computer vision › 3D vision › stereo vision
uncalibrated stereo
0.011989
Characterising an indoor environment with a mobile robot and uncalibrated stereo · ICRA 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical modeling · 0.0binary hypothesis testing · 0.0simulation · 0.0probability theory · 0.0vertical line stereo · 0.0visual scanning · 0.0self-calibration · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 The Effect of Gaussian Error in Object Recognition
abstract
In model based recognition, the goal is to locate an instance of one or more known objects in an image. The problem is compounded in real images by the presence of clutter, occlusion, and sensor error, which can lead to "false negatives", failures to recognize the presence of the object, and "false positives", in which the algorithm incorrectly identifies an occurrence of the object. The probability of either event is affected by parameters within the recognition algorithm, which are almost always chosen in an ad-hoc fashion. The effect of the parameter values on the likelihood that the recognition algorithm will make a mistake are usually not understood explicitly. To address the problem, we explicitly model the noise that occurs in the image. In a typical recognition algorithm, hypotheses about the position of the object are tested against the evidence in the image, and an overall score is assigned to each hypothesis. We use a statistical model to determine what score a correct or incorrect hypothesis is likely to have, and use standard binary hypothesis testing techniques to distinguish correct from incorrect hypotheses. Using this approach, we can compare algorithms and noise models, and automatically choose values for internal system thresholds to minimize the probability of making a mistake.
Karen B. Sarachik
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
1993 Gaussian error models for object recognition
abstract
The probability of false positives and negatives is derived as a function of the number of model features, image features, and occlusion, under the assumption of 2D Gaussian noise and a particular method of evidence accumulation. No assumptions are made about prior distributions on the model space, nor is even the presence of the model assumed. The results are presented in the form of ROC (receiver-operating characteristic) curves, from which several results can be extracted. They demonstrate that the 2D Gaussian error model has better performance than that of the bounded uniform model for the same level of occlusion and clutter. They also directly indicate the optimal performance that can be achieved for a given clutter and occlusion rate and how to choose the thresholds to achieve the desired rates. These ROC curves are verified in the domain of simulated images.>
Karen B. Sarachik, W. Eric L. Grimson
CVPR1
1990 Dynamic World Modeling Using Vertical Line Stereo
James L. Crowley, Philippe Bobet, Karen B. Sarachik
ECCV3
1989 Characterising an indoor environment with a mobile robot and uncalibrated stereo
abstract
The author shows how it is possible for a mobile robot to exploit the visual information obtained by scanning a room to determine its size and shape, and to orient itself continually within it. The equipment used is a very simple camera setup whose detailed initial configuration is not known but can be deduced as the algorithm runs. The approach does not require any special environment, nor is it sensitive to changes in the physical aspect of the room being inspected such as moved furniture or roaming people. The long-term goal of the project is for the robot to use the information thus acquired in order to build maps of its environment, presumed to be a single floor of an office building, and to localize itself within this framework.>
Karen B. Sarachik
ICRA1