Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wei Luo 0016

dblp:05/6715-16 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-8426-7477ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Security and privacy of machine learning · 73% Privacy and data protection · 27%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Security and privacy of machine learning
membership inference
1.922026
When Reasoning Leaks Membership: Membership Inference Attack on Black-box Large Reasoning Models · WWW 2026
Automated Detection of Pre-training Text in Black-box LLMs · IJCAI 2025
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning
training data privacy
1.012026
When Reasoning Leaks Membership: Membership Inference Attack on Black-box Large Reasoning Models · WWW 2026
Security and privacy of machine learning › membership inference
pretraining data detection
0.912025
Automated Detection of Pre-training Text in Black-box LLMs · IJCAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semantic latent space representation · 1.0recall-inference axis · 1.0token perturbation · 0.9sequence-to-sequence mapping · 0.9prototype-based classification · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 When Reasoning Leaks Membership: Membership Inference Attack on Black-box Large Reasoning Models
abstract
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have rapidly gained prominence for their strong performance in solving complex tasks. Many modern black-box LRMs expose the intermediate reasoning traces through APIs to improve transparency (e.g., Gemini-2.5 and Claude-sonnet). Despite their benefits, we find that these traces can leak membership signals, creating a new privacy threat even without access to token logits used in prior attacks. In this work, we initiate the first systematic exploration of Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) on black-box LRMs. Our preliminary analysis shows that LRMs produce confident, recall-like reasoning traces on familiar training member samples but more hesitant, inference-like reasoning traces on non-members. The representations of these traces are continuously distributed in the semantic latent space, spanning from familiar to unfamiliar samples. Building on this observation, we propose BlackSpectrum, the first membership inference attack framework targeting the black-box LRMs. The key idea is to construct a recall–inference axis in the semantic latent space, based on representations derived from the exposed traces. By locating where a query sample falls along this axis, the attacker can obtain a membership score and predict how likely it is to be a member of the training data. Additionally, to address the limitations of outdated datasets unsuited to modern LRMs, we provide two new datasets to support future research, arXivReasoning and BookReasoning. Empirically, exposing reasoning traces greatly increases the vulnerability of LRMs to MIAs, boosting attack accuracy by up to 23.8%, AUC by 29.9%, and nearly doubling TPR@5%FPR. Our findings highlight the need for LRM companies to balance transparency in intermediate reasoning traces with privacy preservation.
Ruihan Hu, Yuming Shang, Wei Luo 0016, Xi Zhang 0008
WWW3
2025 Automated Detection of Pre-training Text in Black-box LLMs
abstract
Detecting whether a given text is a member in the pre-training data of Large Language Models (LLMs) is crucial for ensuring data privacy and copyright protection. Most existing methods rely on the LLM's hidden information (e.g., model parameters or token probabilities), making them ineffective in the black-box setting, where only input and output texts are accessible. Although some methods have been proposed for the black-box setting, they rely on massive manual efforts such as designing complicated questions or instructions. To address these issues, we propose VeilProbe, the first framework for automatically detecting LLMs' pre-training texts in a black-box setting without human intervention. VeilProbe utilizes a sequence-to-sequence mapping model to infer the latent mapping feature between the input text and the corresponding output suffix generated by the LLM. Then it performs the key token perturbations to obtain more distinguishable membership features. Additionally, considering real-world scenarios where the ground-truth training text samples are limited, a prototype-based membership classifier is introduced to alleviate the overfitting issue. Extensive evaluations on three widely used datasets demonstrate that our framework is effective and superior in the black-box setting.
Ruihan Hu, Yuming Shang, Jiankun Peng, Wei Luo 0016, Yazhe Wang, Xi Zhang 0008
IJCAI4