Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alejandro Perez

dblp:05/8864 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
sampling-based motion planning
0.432013
Optimal sampling-based planning for linear-quadratic kinodynamic systems · ICRA 2013
LQR-RRT*: Optimal sampling-based motion planning with automatically derived extension heuristics · ICRA 2012
Anytime Motion Planning using the RRT · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.322012
LQR-RRT*: Optimal sampling-based motion planning with automatically derived extension heuristics · ICRA 2012
Anytime Motion Planning using the RRT · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
kinodynamic planning
0.212013
Optimal sampling-based planning for linear-quadratic kinodynamic systems · ICRA 2013
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › optimal control
linear quadratic regulator
0.212013
Optimal sampling-based planning for linear-quadratic kinodynamic systems · ICRA 2013
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization
0.212013
Optimal sampling-based planning for linear-quadratic kinodynamic systems · ICRA 2013
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
optimal motion planning
0.112012
LQR-RRT*: Optimal sampling-based motion planning with automatically derived extension heuristics · ICRA 2012
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
anytime planning
0.112011
Anytime Motion Planning using the RRT · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
real-time motion planning
0.112011
Anytime Motion Planning using the RRT · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
optimal control
0.012013
Optimal sampling-based planning for linear-quadratic kinodynamic systems · ICRA 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

RRT* · 0.3LQR · 0.2linear quadratic regulation · 0.1RRT · 0.1branch-and-bound · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Home Assistance Technologies for Elderly People: A Brief Evaluation and Software Architectural Proposal
Juan D'Amato, Mauricio González-Palacio, Alejandro Perez, Leonardo Dominguez, Aldo Rubiales, Franco Stramana
WorldCIST (4)3
2018 Video Analytics on a Mixed Network of Robust Cameras with Processing Capabilities
Juan D'Amato, Alejandro Perez, Leonardo Dominguez, Aldo Rubiales, Rosana Barbuzza, Franco Stramana
WorldCIST (1)2
2013 Optimal sampling-based planning for linear-quadratic kinodynamic systems
abstract
We propose a new method for applying RRT* to kinodynamic motion planning problems by using finite-horizon linear quadratic regulation (LQR) to measure cost and to extend the tree. First, we introduce the method in the context of arbitrary affine dynamical systems with quadratic costs. For these systems, the algorithm is shown to converge to optimal solutions almost surely. Second, we extend the algorithm to non-linear systems with non-quadratic costs, and demonstrate its performance experimentally.
Gustavo Goretkin, Alejandro Perez, Robert Platt 0001, George Dimitri Konidaris
ICRA2
2012 LQR-RRT*: Optimal sampling-based motion planning with automatically derived extension heuristics
abstract
The RRT* algorithm has recently been proposed as an optimal extension to the standard RRT algorithm [1]. However, like RRT, RRT* is difficult to apply in problems with complicated or underactuated dynamics because it requires the design of a two domain-specific extension heuristics: a distance metric and node extension method. We propose automatically deriving these two heuristics for RRT* by locally linearizing the domain dynamics and applying linear quadratic regulation (LQR). The resulting algorithm, LQR-RRT*, finds optimal plans in domains with complex or underactuated dynamics without requiring domain-specific design choices. We demonstrate its application in domains that are successively torque-limited, underactuated, and in belief space.
Alejandro Perez, Robert Platt 0001, George Dimitri Konidaris, Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Tomás Lozano-Pérez
ICRA1
2011 Anytime Motion Planning using the RRT
abstract
The Rapidly-exploring Random Tree (RRT) algorithm, based on incremental sampling, efficiently computes motion plans. Although the RRT algorithm quickly produces candidate feasible solutions, it tends to converge to a solution that is far from optimal. Practical applications favor "anytime" algorithms that quickly identify an initial feasible plan, then, given more computation time available during plan execution, improve the plan toward an optimal solution. This paper describes an anytime algorithm based on the RRT* which (like the RRT) finds an initial feasible solution quickly, but (unlike the RRT) almost surely converges to an optimal solution. We present two key extensions to the RRT% committed trajectories and branch-and-bound tree adaptation, that together enable the algorithm to make more efficient use of computation time online, resulting in an anytime algorithm for real-time implementation. We evaluate the method using a series of Monte Carlo runs in a high-fidelity simulation environment, and compare the operation of the RRT and RRT* methods. We also demonstrate experimental results for an outdoor wheeled robotic vehicle.
Sertac Karaman, Matthew R. Walter, Alejandro Perez, Emilio Frazzoli, Seth J. Teller
ICRA3
2011 Asymptotically-optimal path planning for manipulation using incremental sampling-based algorithms
abstract
A desirable property of path planning for robotic manipulation is the ability to identify solutions in a sufficiently short amount of time to be usable. This is particularly challenging for the manipulation problem due to the need to plan over high-dimensional configuration spaces and to perform computationally expensive collision checking procedures. Consequently, existing planners take steps to achieve desired solution times at the cost of low quality solutions. This paper presents a planning algorithm that overcomes these difficulties by augmenting the asymptotically-optimal RRT* with a sparse sampling procedure. With the addition of a collision checking procedure that leverages memoization, this approach has the benefit that it quickly identifies low-cost feasible trajectories and takes advantage of subsequent computation time to refine the solution towards an optimal one. We evaluate the algorithm through a series of Monte Carlo simulations of seven, twelve, and fourteen degree of freedom manipulation planning problems in a realistic simulation environment. The results indicate that the proposed approach provides significant improvements in the quality of both the initial solution and the final path, while incurring almost no computational overhead compared to the RRT algorithm. We conclude with a demonstration of our algorithm for single-arm and dual-arm planning on Willow Garage's PR2 robot.
Alejandro Perez, Sertac Karaman, Alexander C. Shkolnik, Emilio Frazzoli, Seth J. Teller, Matthew R. Walter
IROS1