Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Timothy J. Ley

dblp:06/10819 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0002-9913-0520ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics
0.112012
SomaticSniper: identification of somatic point mutations in whole genome sequencing data · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
gene fusion detection
0.112012
BreakFusion: targeted assembly-based identification of gene fusions in whole transcriptome paired-end sequencing data · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › somatic mutation analysis
somatic mutation detection
0.112012
SomaticSniper: identification of somatic point mutations in whole genome sequencing data · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
transcriptome sequencing
0.112012
BreakFusion: targeted assembly-based identification of gene fusions in whole transcriptome paired-end sequencing data · Bioinform. 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical modeling · 0.1sensitivity and precision estimation · 0.1reference alignment · 0.1read-pair analysis · 0.1de novo assembly · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 SciClone: Inferring Clonal Architecture and Tracking the Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Tumor Evolution
abstract
The sensitivity of massively-parallel sequencing has confirmed that most cancers are oligoclonal, with subpopulations of neoplastic cells harboring distinct mutations. A fine resolution view of this clonal architecture provides insight into tumor heterogeneity, evolution, and treatment response, all of which may have clinical implications. Single tumor analysis already contributes to understanding these phenomena. However, cryptic subclones are frequently revealed by additional patient samples (e.g., collected at relapse or following treatment), indicating that accurately characterizing a tumor requires analyzing multiple samples from the same patient. To address this need, we present SciClone, a computational method that identifies the number and genetic composition of subclones by analyzing the variant allele frequencies of somatic mutations. We use it to detect subclones in acute myeloid leukemia and breast cancer samples that, though present at disease onset, are not evident from a single primary tumor sample. By doing so, we can track tumor evolution and identify the spatial origins of cells resisting therapy.
Christopher A. Miller 0002, Brian S. White, Nathan D. Dees, Malachi Griffith, John S. Welch, Obi L. Griffith, Ravi Vij, Michael H. Tomasson, Timothy A. Graubert, Matthew J. Walter, Matthew J. Ellis, William S. Schierding, John F. DiPersio, Timothy J. Ley, Elaine R. Mardis, Richard K. Wilson
PLoS Comput. Biol.14
2012 BreakFusion: targeted assembly-based identification of gene fusions in whole transcriptome paired-end sequencing data
abstract
Abstract Summary: Despite recent progress, computational tools that identify gene fusions from next-generation whole transcriptome sequencing data are often limited in accuracy and scalability. Here, we present a software package, BreakFusion that combines the strength of reference alignment followed by read-pair analysis and de novo assembly to achieve a good balance in sensitivity, specificity and computational efficiency. Availability: http://bioinformatics.mdanderson.org/main/BreakFusion Contact: [email protected]; [email protected] Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online
Ken Chen 0001, John W. Wallis, Cyriac Kandoth, Joelle M. Kalicki-Veizer, Karen L. Mungall, Andrew J. Mungall, Steven J. M. Jones, Marco A. Marra, Timothy J. Ley, Elaine R. Mardis, Richard K. Wilson, John N. Weinstein
Bioinform.9
2012 SomaticSniper: identification of somatic point mutations in whole genome sequencing data
abstract
MOTIVATION: The sequencing of tumors and their matched normals is frequently used to study the genetic composition of cancer. Despite this fact, there remains a dearth of available software tools designed to compare sequences in pairs of samples and identify sites that are likely to be unique to one sample. RESULTS: In this article, we describe the mathematical basis of our SomaticSniper software for comparing tumor and normal pairs. We estimate its sensitivity and precision, and present several common sources of error resulting in miscalls. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Binaries are freely available for download at http://gmt.genome.wustl.edu/somatic-sniper/current/, implemented in C and supported on Linux and Mac OS X. CONTACT: [email protected]; [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
David E. Larson, Christopher C. Harris, Ken Chen 0001, Daniel C. Koboldt, Travis E. Abbott, David J. Dooling, Timothy J. Ley, Elaine R. Mardis, Richard K. Wilson
Bioinform.7