Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Mark A. Keck

dblp:06/1933 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Video understanding and tracking · 53% 3D vision · 47%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking
3d object tracking
0.232011
Recovery and Reasoning About Occlusions in 3D Using Few Cameras with Applications to 3D Tracking · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2011
Kernel-Based 3D Tracking · CVPR 2007
3D occlusion recovery using few cameras · CVPR 2008
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene understanding
occlusion reasoning
0.112011
Recovery and Reasoning About Occlusions in 3D Using Few Cameras with Applications to 3D Tracking · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2011
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction
0.112008
3D occlusion recovery using few cameras · CVPR 2008
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene understanding › occlusion reasoning
occlusion modeling
0.112008
3D occlusion recovery using few cameras · CVPR 2008
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
multi-camera tracking
0.112007
Kernel-Based 3D Tracking · CVPR 2007
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
object tracking
0.112007
Kernel-Based 3D Tracking · CVPR 2007
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
multi-view reconstruction
0.012011
Recovery and Reasoning About Occlusions in 3D Using Few Cameras with Applications to 3D Tracking · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic occlusion model · 0.1graph cuts · 0.1energy minimization · 0.1kernel-based tracking · 0.1appearance feature fusion · 0.13d point cloud clustering · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Recovery and Reasoning About Occlusions in 3D Using Few Cameras with Applications to 3D Tracking
Mark A. Keck, James W. Davis
Int. J. Comput. Vis.1
2008 3D occlusion recovery using few cameras
abstract
We present a practical framework for detecting and modeling 3D static occlusions for wide-baseline, multi-camera scenarios where the number of cameras is small. The framework consists of an iterative learning procedure where at each frame the occlusion model is used to solve the voxel occupancy problem, and this solution is then used to update the occlusion model. Along with this iterative procedure, there are two contributions of the proposed work: (1) a novel energy function (which can be minimized via graph cuts) specifically designed for use in this procedure, and (2) an application that incorporates our probabilistic occlusion model into a 3D tracking system. Both qualitative and quantitative results of the proposed algorithm and its incorporation with a 3D tracker are presented for support.
Mark A. Keck, James W. Davis
CVPR1
2007 Kernel-Based 3D Tracking
abstract
We present a computer vision system for robust object tracking in 3D by combining evidence from multiple calibrated cameras. This kernel-based 3D tracker is automatically bootstrapped by constructing 3D point clouds. These points clouds are then clustered and used to initialize the trackers and validate their performance. The framework describes a complete tracking system that fuses appearance features from all available camera sensors and is capable of automatic initialization and drift detection. Its elegance resides in its inherent ability to handle problems encountered by various 2D trackers, including scale selection, occlusion, view-dependence, and correspondence across views. Tracking results for an indoor smart room and a multi-camera outdoor surveillance scenario are presented. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this unified approach by comparing its performance to a baseline 3D tracker that fuses results of independent 2D trackers, as well as comparing the re-initialization results to known ground truth.
Ambrish Tyagi, Mark A. Keck, James W. Davis, Gerasimos Potamianos
CVPR2