Earlier studies of computerized brainstorming showed that by restructuring group processes, groups can overcome well known performance deficits that groups suffer relative to nominal groups.These earlier tools are essentially computerized versions of Nominal Group Technique.We examined the ability of a simple, unstructured parallel editor to facilitate idea generation in face to face groups.Our results showed that parallel interacting groups outperformed serial interacting groups, and parallel interacting groups did not differ significantly from nominal, non interacting groups.Thus, an informal tool that allows parallel work is an effective way to increase idea generation in real interacting groups.