Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William J. Gallagher

dblp:06/2650 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Virtual and augmented reality · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot manipulation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Virtual and augmented reality › mixed reality
augmented virtuality
0.412019
Experimental Evaluation of Teleoperation Interfaces for Cutting of Satellite Insulation · ICRA 2019
Human-robot interaction
teleoperation
0.412019
Experimental Evaluation of Teleoperation Interfaces for Cutting of Satellite Insulation · ICRA 2019
Human-robot interaction › teleoperation
teleoperation interface
0.412019
Experimental Evaluation of Teleoperation Interfaces for Cutting of Satellite Insulation · ICRA 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

human subject study · 0.8human-subject study · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Experimental Evaluation of Teleoperation Interfaces for Cutting of Satellite Insulation
abstract
On-orbit servicing of satellites is complicated by the fact that almost all existing satellites were not designed to be serviced. This creates a number of challenges, one of which is to cut and partially remove the protective thermal blanketing that encases a satellite prior to performing the servicing operation. A human operator on Earth can perform this task telerobotically, but must overcome difficulties presented by the multi-second round-trip telemetry delay between the satellite and the operator and the limited, or even obstructed, views from the available cameras.This paper reports the results of ground-based experiments with trained NASA robot teleoperators to compare our recently-reported augmented virtuality visualization to the conventional camera-based visualization. We also compare the master console of a da Vinci surgical robot to the conventional teleoperation interface. The results show that, for the cutting task, the augmented virtuality visualization can improve operator performance compared to the conventional visualization, but that operators are more proficient with the conventional control interface than with the da Vinci master console.
Will Pryor, Balázs Vágvölgyi, William J. Gallagher, Anton Deguet, Simon Léonard, Louis L. Whitcomb, Peter Kazanzides
ICRA3