Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rukma Prabhu Verlekar
dblp:06/2814
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 88% Distributed systems · 12% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A methodology and tool for performance analysis of distributed server systems · ICSE 2006 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › queueing models
queueing network model |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A methodology and tool for performance analysis of distributed server systems · ICSE 2006 |
Distributed systems › distributed system architecture
distributed server architecture |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | A methodology and tool for performance analysis of distributed server systems · ICSE 2006 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
performance analysis tools |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | A methodology and tool for performance analysis of distributed server systems · ICSE 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
use case scenarios · 0.1queueing network analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | A Proxy-Based Self-tuned Overload Control for Multi-tiered Server Systems
Rukma Prabhu Verlekar, Varsha Apte |
HiPC | 1 |
| 2007 | PerfCenter: A Methodology and Tool for Performance Analysis of Application Hosting CentersabstractWe present a tool, PerfCenter, that takes as input the deployment, configuration, message flow and workload details of the hardware and software servers in an application hosting center, and predicts the performance of the applications. We allow for a hierarchical specification of the data center, where software is deployed on machines, machines consist of hardware devices and are deployed on LANs. We also explicitly model network links between LANs and model the contention at those links due to messages exchanged between servers. While tools and methodologies for such analysis have been proposed earlier, our approach allows for the most natural specification of a "data center" architecture, and is best suited for aiding in design decisions regarding deployment and configuration of software on various hardware architecture scenarios. The tool takes this high level input and generates the underlying queueing network, which is then solved analytically. Since we allow for synchronous method calls, and model contention at software as well as hardware resources, the generated queueing network is solved using approximate methods. We validate the solution against results obtained from a measurement testbed, and found that the predicted values were reasonably accurate. Rukma Prabhu Verlekar, Varsha Apte, Prakhar Goyal, Bhavish Agarwal |
MASCOTS | 1 |
| 2006 | A methodology and tool for performance analysis of distributed server systemsabstractWe present a methodology and tool for performance analysis of distributed server systems, which allows high-level specification of the system, and generates and solves the underlying queueing network model. Our approach is different from the existing ones in that the specification captures the natural manner in which application servers are deployed on machines and machines are deployed on networks. The model does not impose any strict tiers on the server system. Multiple use case scenarios can be specified, and the tool computes measures such as end-to-end response times for each scenario while taking into account queueing delays at the hardware device, software threads and at the network. The development of the tool is ongoing, and will include detailed network protocol models as well as more flexible distributed system behavior, in the future. Rukma Prabhu Verlekar, Varsha Apte |
ICSE | 1 |