Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tae-Kun Seo

dblp:06/3376 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
molecular evolution
0.012002
A viral sampling design for testing the molecular clock and for estimating evolutionary rates and divergence times · Bioinform. 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular evolution
evolutionary rate estimation
0.012002
A viral sampling design for testing the molecular clock and for estimating evolutionary rates and divergence times · Bioinform. 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular evolution
viral evolution
0.012002
A viral sampling design for testing the molecular clock and for estimating evolutionary rates and divergence times · Bioinform. 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical approximation · 0.0power analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 A viral sampling design for testing the molecular clock and for estimating evolutionary rates and divergence times
abstract
MOTIVATION: The high pace of viral sequence change means that variation in the times at which sequences are sampled can have a profound effect both on the ability to detect trends over time in evolutionary rates and on the power to reject the Molecular Clock Hypothesis (MCH). Trends in viral evolutionary rates are of particular interest because their detection may allow connections to be established between a patient's treatment or condition and the process of evolution. Variation in sequence isolation times also impacts the uncertainty associated with estimates of divergence times and evolutionary rates. Variation in isolation times can be intentionally adjusted to increase the power of hypothesis tests and to reduce the uncertainty of evolutionary parameter estimates, but this fact has received little previous attention. RESULTS: We provide approximations for the power to reject the MCH when the alternative is that rates change in a linear fashion over time and when the alternative is that rates differ randomly among branches. In addition, we approximate the standard deviation of estimated evolutionary rates and divergence times. We illustrate how these approximations can be exploited to determine which viral sample to sequence when samples representing different dates are available.
Tae-Kun Seo, Jeffrey L. Thorne, Masami Hasegawa, Hirohisa Kishino
Bioinform.1