Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gregory I. Elmer
dblp:06/3680
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Associating quantitative behavioral traits with gene expression in the brain: searching for diamonds in the hay · Bioinform. 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › genotype-phenotype association
gene-phenotype association |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Associating quantitative behavioral traits with gene expression in the brain: searching for diamonds in the hay · Bioinform. 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biostatistics › statistical bioinformatics
statistical genomics |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Associating quantitative behavioral traits with gene expression in the brain: searching for diamonds in the hay · Bioinform. 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multiple testing correction · 0.1hierarchical FDR testing · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Associating quantitative behavioral traits with gene expression in the brain: searching for diamonds in the hayabstractUNLABELLED: Gene expression and phenotypic functionality can best be associated when they are measured quantitatively within the same experiment. The analysis of such a complex experiment is presented, searching for associations between measures of exploratory behavior in mice and gene expression in brain regions. The analysis of such experiments raises several methodological problems. First and foremost, the size of the pool of potential discoveries being screened is enormous yet only few biologically relevant findings are expected, making the problem of multiple testing especially severe. We present solutions based on screening by testing related hypotheses, then testing the hypotheses of interest. In one variant the subset is selected directly, in the other one a tree of hypotheses is tested hierarchical; both variants control the False Discovery Rate (FDR). Other problems in such experiments are in the fact that the level of data aggregation may be different for the quantitative traits (one per animal) and gene expression measurements (pooled across animals); in that the association may not be linear; and in the resolution of interest only few replications exist. We offer solutions to these problems as well. The hierarchical FDR testing strategies presented here can serve beyond the structure of our motivating example study to any complex microarray study. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Anat Reiner-Benaim, Daniel Yekutieli, Noah E. Letwin, Gregory I. Elmer, Norman H. Lee, Neri Kafkafi, Yoav Benjamini |
Bioinform. | 4 |