In this paper we study the fractional vertex cover problem on trees in two related models: online and incremental. In the online model, the vertices of the tree are known a priori and the edges arrive one at a time. The goal is to maintain a fractional vertex cover of the tree, i.e., an assignment of fractional weights from [0,1] to the vertices such that the weights of endpoints of every edge sum up to at least one. After each edge arrival, we need to modify the fractional vertex cover to cover the new edge as well. However, we can only increase the values assigned to vertices. The problem was studied before (in the vertex arrival model) by Wang and Wong, who motivated it as a generalization of the ski-rental problem, but also (more importantly) by its close connection to the dual online matching problem. They presented a 1.901-competitive algorithm for general graphs in the vertex arrival model. We present an 11/6 ≈ 1.83-competitive algorithm for trees in the more general edge arrival model. In addition, we study the fractional vertex cover problem in an incremental model, where we again seek a fractional vertex cover after every update, but all the updates to the tree are known to the algorithm a priori. In this model, we give a 1.5-competitive algorithm and provide a matching lower bound.

The Directed Traveling Salesman Problem (DTSP) is a variant of the classical Traveling Salesman Problem in which the edges in the graph are directed and a vertex and edge can be visited multiple times. The goal is to find a directed closed walk of minimum length (or total weight) that visits every vertex of the given graph at least once. In a yet more general version, Directed Waypoint Routing Problem (DWRP), some vertices are marked as terminals and we are only required to visit all terminals. Furthermore, each edge has its capacity bounding the number of times this edge can be used by a solution. While both problems (and many other variants of TSP) were extensively investigated, mostly from the approximation point of view, there are surprisingly few results concerning the parameterized complexity. Our starting point is the result of Marx et al. [APPROX/RANDOM 2016] who proved that DTSP is W[1]-hard parameterized by distance to pathwidth 3. In this paper we aim to initiate the systematic complexity study of variants of Directed Traveling Salesman Problem with respect to various, mostly structural, parameters. We show that DWRP is FPT parameterized by the solution size, the feedback edge number and the vertex integrity of the underlying undirected graph. Furthermore, the problem is XP parameterized by treewidth. On the complexity side, we show that the problem is W[1]-hard parameterized by the distance to constant treedepth.

Realistic metric spaces (such as road/transportation networks) tend to be much more tractable then general metrics. In an attempt to formalize this intuition, Abraham et. al. (SODA 2010, JACM 2016) introduced the notion of highway dimension. A weighted graph G has highway dimension h if for every ball B of radius ≈ 4r there is a hitting set of size h hitting all the shortest paths of length > r in B. Unfortunately, this definition fails to incorporate some very natural metric spaces such as the grid graph, and the Euclidean plane.

In this article, we reassess the parameterized complexity and approximability of the well-studied Steiner Forest problem in several graph classes of bounded width. The problem takes an edge-weighted graph and pairs of vertices as input, and the aim is to find a minimum cost subgraph in which each given vertex pair lies in the same connected component. It is known that this problem is APX-hard in general, and NP-hard on graphs of treewidth 3, treedepth 4, and feedback vertex set size 2. However, Bateni et al. gave an approximation scheme with a run time of \(n^{O(k^{2}/{\varepsilon})}\) on graphs of treewidth \( k \) . Our main result is a much faster Efficient Parameterized Approximation Scheme (EPAS) with a run time of \(2^{O(\frac{k^{2}}{{\varepsilon}}\log\frac{k}{{\varepsilon}})}\,{\cdot}\,n^{O(1)}\) . If \( k \) instead is the vertex cover number of the input graph, we show how to compute the optimum solution in \(2^{O(k\log k)}\,{\cdot}\,n^{O(1)}\) time, and we also prove that this run-time dependence on \( k \) is asymptotically best possible, under ETH. Furthermore, if \( k \) is the size of a feedback edge set, then we obtain a faster \(2^{O(k)}\cdot n^{O(1)}\) time algorithm, which again cannot be improved under ETH.

In the Tricolored Euclidean Traveling Salesperson problem, we are given~$k=3$ sets of points in the plane and are looking for disjoint tours, each covering one of the sets. Arora (1998) famously gave a PTAS based on ``patching'' for the case $k=1$ and, recently, Dross et al.~(2023) generalized this result to~$k=2$. Our contribution is a $(5/3+ε)$-approximation algorithm for~$k=3$ that further generalizes Arora's approach. It is believed that patching is generally no longer possible for more than two tours. We circumvent this issue by either applying a conditional patching scheme for three tours or using an alternative approach based on a weighted solution for $k=2$.

In this paper we reassess the parameterized complexity and approximability of the well-studied Steiner Forest problem in several graph classes of bounded width. The problem takes an edge-weighted graph and pairs of vertices as input, and the aim is to find a minimum cost subgraph in which each given vertex pair lies in the same connected component. It is known that this problem is APX-hard in general, and NP-hard on graphs of treewidth 3, treedepth 4, and feedback vertex set size 2. However, Bateni, Hajiaghayi and Marx [JACM, 2011] gave an approximation scheme with a runtime of n^O(k²/ε) on graphs of treewidth k. Our main result is a much faster efficient parameterized approximation scheme (EPAS) with a runtime of 2^O(k²/ε log k/ε)⋅n^O(1). If k instead is the vertex cover number of the input graph, we show how to compute the optimum solution in 2^O(k log k)⋅n^O(1) time, and we also prove that this runtime dependence on k is asymptotically best possible, under ETH. Furthermore, if k is the size of a feedback edge set, then we obtain a faster 2^O(k)⋅n^O(1) time algorithm, which again cannot be improved under ETH.

We consider the Sparse Hitting Set (Sparse-HS) problem, where we are given a set system $(V,\mathcal{F},\mathcal{B})$ with two families $\mathcal{F},\mathcal{B}$ of subsets of $V$. The task is to find a hitting set for $\mathcal{F}$ that minimizes the maximum number of elements in any of the sets of $\mathcal{B}$. Our focus is on determining the complexity of some special cases of Sparse-HS with respect to the sparseness $k$, which is the optimum number of hitting set elements in any set of $\mathcal{B}$. For the Sparse Vertex Cover (Sparse-VC) problem, $V$ is given by the vertex set of a graph, and $\mathcal{F}$ is its edge set. We prove NP-hardness for sparseness $k\geq 2$ and polynomial time solvability for $k=1$. We also provide a polynomial-time $2$-approximation for any $k$. A special case of Sparse-VC is Fair Vertex Cover (Fair-VC), where the family $\mathcal{B}$ is given by vertex neighbourhoods. For this problem we prove NP-hardness for constant $k$ and provide a polynomial-time $(2-\frac{1}{k})$-approximation. This is better than any approximation possible for Sparse-VC or Vertex Cover (under UGC). We then consider two problems derived from Sparse-HS related to the highway dimension, a graph parameter modelling transportation networks. Most algorithms for graphs of low highway dimension compute solutions to the $r$-Shortest Path Cover ($r$-SPC) problem, where $r>0$, $\mathcal{F}$ contains all shortest paths of length between $r$ and $2r$, and $\mathcal{B}$ contains all balls of radius $2r$. There is an XP algorithm that computes solutions to $r$-SPC of sparseness at most $h$ if the input graph has highway dimension $h$, but the existence if an FPT algorithm was open. We prove that $r$-SPC and also the related $r$-Highway Dimension ($r$-HD) problem are both W[1]-hard. Furthermore, we prove that $r$-SPC admits a polynomial-time $O(\log n)$-approximation.

We present a novel linear program (LP) for the Steiner Tree problem, where a set of terminal vertices needs to be connected by a minimum weight tree in a graph G = (V,E) with non-negative edge weights. This well-studied problem is NP-hard and therefore does not have a compact extended formulation (describing the convex hull of all Steiner trees) of polynomial size, unless P=NP. On the other hand, Steiner Tree is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) when parameterized by the number k of terminals, and can be solved in O(3^k|V|+2^k|V|²) time via the Dreyfus-Wagner algorithm. A natural question thus is whether the Steiner Tree problem admits an extended formulation of comparable size. We first answer this in the negative by proving a lower bound on the extension complexity of the Steiner Tree polytope, which, for some constant c > 0, implies that no extended formulation of size f(k)2^{cn} exists for any function f. However, we are able to circumvent this lower bound due to the fact that the edge weights are non-negative: we prove that Steiner Tree admits an integral LP with O(3^k|E|) variables and constraints. The size of our LP matches the runtime of the Dreyfus-Wagner algorithm, and our poof gives a polyhedral perspective on this classic algorithm. Our proof is simple, and additionally improves on a previous result by Siebert et al. [2018], who gave an integral LP of size O((2k/e)^k)|V|^{O(1)}.

We present a data structure that in a dynamic graph of treedepth at most d, which is modified over time by edge insertions and deletions, maintains an optimum-height elimination forest. The data structure achieves worst-case update time , which matches the best known parameter dependency in the running time of a static fpt algorithm for computing the treedepth of a graph. This improves a result of Dvořák et al. [ESA 2014], who for the same problem achieved update time f(d) for some non-elementary (i.e. tower-exponential) function f. As a by-product, we improve known upper bounds on the sizes of minimal obstructions for having treedepth d from doubly-exponential in d to dO(d). As applications, we design new fully dynamic parameterized data structures for detecting long paths and cycles in general graphs. More precisely, for a fixed parameter k and a dynamic graph G, modified over time by edge insertions and deletions, our data structures maintain answers to the following queries: Does G contain a simple path on k vertices? Does G contain a simple cycle on at least k vertices? In the first case, the data structure achieves amortized update time . In the second case, the amortized update time is . In both cases we assume access to a dictionary on the edges of G.

We consider the classic Facility Location, k -Median, and k -Means problems in metric spaces of doubling dimension d . We give nearly linear-time approximation schemes for each problem. The complexity of our algorithms is Õ(2 (1/ε) O(d2) n) , making a significant improvement over the state-of-the-art algorithms that run in time n (d/ε) O(d) . Moreover, we show how to extend the techniques used to get the first efficient approximation schemes for the problems of prize-collecting k -Median and k -Means and efficient bicriteria approximation schemes for k -Median with outliers, k -Means with outliers and k -Center.

We study clustering problems such as k-Median, k-Means, and Facility Location in graphs of low highway dimension, which is a graph parameter modeling transportation networks. It was previously shown that approximation schemes for these problems exist, which either run in quasi-polynomial time (assuming constant highway dimension) [Feldmann et al. SICOMP 2018] or run in FPT time (parameterized by the number of clusters $k$, the highway dimension, and the approximation factor) [Becker et al. ESA~2018, Braverman et al. 2020]. In this paper we show that a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) exists (assuming constant highway dimension). We also show that the considered problems are NP-hard on graphs of highway dimension 1.

We study the Steiner Tree problem, in which a set of terminal vertices needs to be connected in the cheapest possible way in an edge-weighted graph. This problem has been extensively studied from the viewpoint of approximation and also parameterization. In particular, on one hand Steiner Tree is known to be ${APX}$-hard, and ${W[2]}$-hard on the other, if parameterized by the number of nonterminals ( Steiner vertices) in the optimum solution. In contrast to this, we give an efficient parameterized approximation scheme (${EPAS}$), which circumvents both hardness results. Moreover, our methods imply the existence of a polynomial size approximate kernelization scheme (${PSAKS}$) for the considered parameter. We further study the parameterized approximability of other variants of Steiner Tree, such as Directed Steiner Tree and Steiner Forest. For none of these is an ${EPAS}$ likely to exist for the studied parameter. For Steiner Forest an easy observation shows that the problem is ${APX}$-hard, even if the input graph contains no Steiner vertices. For Directed Steiner Tree we prove that approximating within any function of the studied parameter is ${W[1]}$-hard. Nevertheless, we show that an ${EPAS}$ exists for Unweighted Directed Steiner Tree, but a ${PSAKS}$ does not. We also prove that there is an ${EPAS}$ and a ${PSAKS}$ for Steiner Forest if in addition to the number of Steiner vertices, the number of connected components of an optimal solution is considered to be a parameter.

The D irected S teiner N etwork (DSN) problem takes as input a directed graph G =( V , E ) with non-negative edge-weights and a set D ⊆ V × V of k demand pairs. The aim is to compute the cheapest network N⊆ G for which there is an s\rightarrow t path for each ( s , t )∈ D. It is known that this problem is notoriously hard, as there is no k 1/4− o (1) -approximation algorithm under Gap-ETH, even when parametrizing the runtime by k [Dinur & Manurangsi, ITCS 2018]. In light of this, we systematically study several special cases of DSN and determine their parameterized approximability for the parameter k . For the bi -DSNP lanar problem, the aim is to compute a solution N⊆ G whose cost is at most that of an optimum planar solution in a bidirected graph G , i.e., for every edge uv of G the reverse edge vu exists and has the same weight. This problem is a generalization of several well-studied special cases. Our main result is that this problem admits a parameterized approximation scheme (PAS) for k . We also prove that our result is tight in the sense that (a) the runtime of our PAS cannot be significantly improved, and (b) no PAS exists for any generalization of bi-DSNP lanar , under standard complexity assumptions. The techniques we use also imply a polynomial-sized approximate kernelization scheme (PSAKS). Additionally, we study several generalizations of bi -DSNP lanar and obtain upper and lower bounds on obtainable runtimes parameterized by k . One important special case of DSN is the S trongly C onnected S teiner S ubgraph (SCSS) problem, for which the solution network N⊆ G needs to strongly connect a given set of k terminals. It has been observed before that for SCSS a parameterized 2-approximation exists for parameter k [Chitnis et al., IPEC 2013]. We give a tight inapproximability result by showing that for k no parameterized (2 − ε)-approximation algorithm exists under Gap-ETH. Additionally, we show that when restricting the input of SCSS to bidirected graphs, the problem remains NP-hard but becomes FPT for k .

We develop an FPT algorithm and a bi-kernel for the Weighted Edge Clique Partition (WECP) problem, where a graph with $n$ vertices and integer edge weights is given together with an integer $k$, and the aim is to find $k$ cliques, such that every edge appears in exactly as many cliques as its weight. The problem has been previously only studied in the unweighted version called Edge Clique Partition (ECP), where the edges need to be partitioned into $k$ cliques. It was shown that ECP admits a kernel with~$k^2$ vertices [Mujuni and Rosamond, 2008], but this kernel does not extend to WECP. The previously fastest algorithm known for ECP has a runtime of $2^{\mathcal{O}(k^2)}n^{O(1)}$ [Issac, 2019]. For WECP we develop a bi-kernel with $4^k$ vertices, and an algorithm with runtime $2^{\mathcal{O}(k^{3/2}w^{1/2}\log(k/w))}n^{O(1)}$, where $w$ is the maximum edge weight. The latter in particular improves the runtime for ECP to~$2^{\mathcal{O}(k^{3/2}\log k)}n^{O(1)}$.

In this paper we study the hardness of the $$k$$ -Center problem on inputs that model transportation networks. For the problem, a graph $$G=(V,E)$$ with edge lengths and an integer k are given and a center set $$C\subseteq V$$ needs to be chosen such that $$|C|\le k$$ . The aim is to minimize the maximum distance of any vertex in the graph to the closest center. This problem arises in many applications of logistics, and thus it is natural to consider inputs that model transportation networks. Such inputs are often assumed to be planar graphs, low doubling metrics, or bounded highway dimension graphs. For each of these models, parameterized approximation algorithms have been shown to exist. We complement these results by proving that the $$k$$ -Center problem is W[1]-hard on planar graphs of constant doubling dimension, where the parameter is the combination of the number of centers k, the highway dimension h, and the pathwidth p. Moreover, under the exponential time hypothesis there is no $$f(k,p,h)\cdot n^{o(p+\sqrt{k+h})}$$ time algorithm for any computable function f. Thus it is unlikely that the optimum solution to $$k$$ -Center can be found efficiently, even when assuming that the input graph abides to all of the above models for transportation networks at once! Additionally we give a simple parameterized $$(1+{\varepsilon })$$ -approximation algorithm for inputs of doubling dimension d with runtime $$(k^k/{\varepsilon }^{O(kd)})\cdot n^{O(1)}$$ . This generalizes a previous result, which considered inputs in D-dimensional $$L_q$$ metrics.

Given a vertex-weighted directed graph $G=(V,E)$ and a set $T=\{t_1, t_2, \ldots, t_k\}$ of $k$ terminals, the objective of the Strongly Connected Steiner Subgraph (SCSS) problem is to find a vertex set $H\subseteq V$ of minimum weight such that $G[H]$ contains a $t_{i}\rightarrow t_j$ path for each $i\neq j$. The problem is NP-hard, but Feldman and Ruhl [ SIAM J. Comput., 36 (2006), pp. 543--561] gave a novel $n^{O(k)}$ algorithm for the SCSS problem, where $n$ is the number of vertices in the graph and $k$ is the number of terminals. We explore how much easier the problem becomes on planar directed graphs. Our main algorithmic result is a $2^{O(k)}\cdot n^{O(\sqrt{k})}$ algorithm for planar SCSS, which is an improvement of a factor of $O(\sqrt{k})$ in the exponent over the algorithm of Feldman and Ruhl. Our main hardness result is a matching lower bound for our algorithm: we show that planar SCSS does not have an $f(k)\cdot n^{o(\sqrt{k})}$ algorithm for any computable function $f$, unless the exponential time hypothesis (ETH) fails. To obtain our algorithm, we first show combinatorially that there is a minimal solution whose treewidth is $O(\sqrt{k})$, and then use the dynamic-programming based algorithm for finding bounded-treewidth solutions due to Feldmann and Marx [The Complexity Landscape of Fixed-Parameter Directed Steiner Network Problems, preprint, ŭlhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06808]. To obtain the lower bound matching the algorithm, we need a delicate construction of gadgets arranged in a gridlike fashion to tightly control the number of terminals in the created instance. The following additional results put our upper and lower bounds in context: our $2^{O(k)}\cdot n^{O(\sqrt{k})}$ algorithm for planar directed graphs can be generalized to graphs excluding a fixed minor. Additionally, we can obtain this running time for the problem of finding an optimal planar solution even if the input graph is not planar. In general graphs, we cannot hope for such a dramatic improvement over the $n^{O(k)}$ algorithm of Feldman and Ruhl: assuming ETH, SCSS in general graphs does not have an $f(k)\cdot n^{o(k/\log k)}$ algorithm for any computable function $f$. Feldman and Ruhl generalized their $n^{O(k)}$ algorithm to the more general Directed Steiner Network (DSN) problem; here the task is to find a subgraph of minimum weight such that for every source $s_i$ there is a path to the corresponding terminal $t_i$. We show that, assuming ETH, there is no $f(k)\cdot n^{o(k)}$ time algorithm for DSN on acyclic planar graphs. All our lower bounds hold for the integer weighted edge version, while the algorithm works for the more general unweighted vertex version.

We consider the classic Facility Location, k-Median, and k-Means problems in metric spaces of constant doubling dimension. We give the first nearly linear-time approximation schemes for each problem, making a significant improvement over the state-of-the-art algorithms. Moreover, we show how to extend the techniques used to get the first efficient approximation schemes for the problems of prize-collecting k-Medians and k-Means, and efficient bicriteria approximation schemes for k-Medians with outliers, k-Means with outliers and k-Center.

Cut problems and connectivity problems on digraphs are two well-studied classes of problems from the viewpoint of parameterized complexity. After a series of papers over the last decade, we now have (almost) tight bounds for the running time of several standard variants of these problems parameterized by two parameters: the number k of terminals and the size p of the solution. When there is evidence of FPT intractability, then the next natural alternative is to consider FPT approximations. In this paper, we show two types of results for directed cut and connectivity problems, building on existing results from the literature: first is to circumvent the hardness results for these problems by designing FPT approximation algorithms, or alternatively strengthen the existing hardness results by creating "gap-instances" under stronger hypotheses such as the (Gap-)Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). Formally, we show the following results: Cutting paths between a set of terminal pairs, i.e., Directed Multicut: Pilipczuk and Wahlstrom [TOCT '18] showed that Directed Multicut is W[1]-hard when parameterized by p if k=4. We complement this by showing the following two results: - Directed Multicut has a k/2-approximation in 2^{O(p^2)}* n^{O(1)} time (i.e., a 2-approximation if k=4), - Under Gap-ETH, Directed Multicut does not admit an (59/58-epsilon)-approximation in f(p)* n^{O(1)} time, for any computable function f, even if k=4. Connecting a set of terminal pairs, i.e., Directed Steiner Network (DSN): The DSN problem on general graphs is known to be W[1]-hard parameterized by p+k due to Guo et al. [SIDMA '11]. Dinur and Manurangsi [ITCS '18] further showed that there is no FPT k^{1/4-o(1)}-approximation algorithm parameterized by k, under Gap-ETH. Chitnis et al. [SODA '14] considered the restriction to special graph classes, but unfortunately this does not lead to FPT algorithms either: DSN on planar graphs is W[1]-hard parameterized by k. In this paper we consider the DSN_Planar problem which is an intermediate version: the graph is general, but we want to find a solution whose cost is at most that of an optimal planar solution (if one exists). We show the following lower bounds for DSN_Planar: - DSN_Planar has no (2-epsilon)-approximation in FPT time parameterized by k, under Gap-ETH. This answers in the negative a question of Chitnis et al. [ESA '18]. - DSN_Planar is W[1]-hard parameterized by k+p. Moreover, under ETH, there is no (1+epsilon)-approximation for DSN_Planar in f(k,p,epsilon)* n^{o(k+sqrt{p+1/epsilon})} time for any computable function f. Pairwise connecting a set of terminals, i.e., Strongly Connected Steiner Subgraph (SCSS): Guo et al. [SIDMA '11] showed that SCSS is W[1]-hard parameterized by p+k, while Chitnis et al. [SODA '14] showed that SCSS remains W[1]-hard parameterized by p, even if the input graph is planar. In this paper we consider the SCSS_Planar problem which is an intermediate version: the graph is general, but we want to find a solution whose cost is at most that of an optimal planar solution (if one exists). We show the following lower bounds for SCSS_Planar: - SCSS_Planar is W[1]-hard parameterized by k+p. Moreover, under ETH, there is no (1+epsilon)-approximation for SCSS_Planar in f(k,p,epsilon)* n^{o(sqrt{k+p+1/epsilon})} time for any computable function f. Previously, the only known FPT approximation results for SCSS applied to general graphs parameterized by k: a 2-approximation by Chitnis et al. [IPEC '13], and a matching (2-epsilon)-hardness under Gap-ETH by Chitnis et al. [ESA '18].

In the Steiner Orientation problem, the input is a mixed graph G (it has both directed and undirected edges) and a set of k terminal pairs $$\mathscr {T}$$ . The question is whether we can orient the undirected edges in a way such that there is a directed $$s\leadsto t$$ path for each terminal pair $$(s,t)\in \mathscr {T}$$ . Arkin and Hassin [DAM’02] showed that the Steiner Orientation problem is NP-complete. They also gave a polynomial time algorithm for the special case when $$k=2$$ . From the viewpoint of exact algorithms, Cygan et al. [ESA’12, SIDMA’13] designed an XP algorithm running in $$n^{O(k)}$$ time for all $$k\ge 1$$ . Pilipczuk and Wahlström [SODA’16, TOCT’18] showed that the Steiner Orientation problem is W[1]-hard parameterized by k. As a byproduct of their reduction, they were able to show that under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) of Impagliazzo, Paturi and Zane [JCSS’01] the Steiner Orientation problem does not admit an $$f(k)\cdot n^{o(k/\log k)}$$ algorithm for any computable function f. In this paper, we give a short and easy proof that the $$n^{O(k)}$$ algorithm of Cygan et al. is asymptotically optimal, even if the input graph is planar. Formally, we show that the Planar Steiner Orientation problem is W[1]-hard parameterized by the number k of terminal pairs, and, under ETH, cannot be solved in $$f(k)\cdot n^{o(k)}$$ time for any computable function f. Moreover, under a stronger hypothesis called Gap-ETH of Dinur [ECCC’16] and Manurangsi and Raghavendra [ICALP’17], we are able to show that there is no constant $$\vartheta >0$$ such that Planar Steiner Orientation admits an $$(\frac{19}{20}+\vartheta )$$ -approximation in FPT time, i.e., no $$f(k)\cdot n^{o(k)}$$ time algorithm can distinguish between the case when all k pairs are satisfiable versus the case when less than $$k \cdot (\frac{19}{20}+\vartheta )$$ pairs are satisfiable. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first FPT inapproximability result on planar graphs.

The Directed Steiner Network (DSN) problem takes as input a directed edge-weighted graph G=(V,E) and a set {D}subseteq V x V of k demand pairs. The aim is to compute the cheapest network N subseteq G for which there is an s - t path for each (s,t)in {D}. It is known that this problem is notoriously hard as there is no k^{1/4-o(1)}-approximation algorithm under Gap-ETH, even when parameterizing the runtime by k [Dinur Manurangsi, ITCS 2018]. In light of this, we systematically study several special cases of DSN and determine their parameterized approximability for the parameter k. For the bi-DSN_Planar problem, the aim is to compute a planar optimum solution N subseteq G in a bidirected graph G, i.e. for every edge uv of G the reverse edge vu exists and has the same weight. This problem is a generalization of several well-studied special cases. Our main result is that this problem admits a parameterized approximation scheme (PAS) for k. We also prove that our result is tight in the sense that (a) the runtime of our PAS cannot be significantly improved, and (b) it is unlikely that a PAS exists for any generalization of bi-DSN_Planar, unless FPT=W[1]. Additionally we study several generalizations of bi-DSN_Planar and obtain upper and lower bounds on obtainable runtimes parameterized by k. One important special case of DSN is the Strongly Connected Steiner Subgraph (SCSS) problem, for which the solution network N subseteq G needs to strongly connect a given set of k terminals. It has been observed before that for SCSS a parameterized 2-approximation exists when parameterized by k [Chitnis et al., IPEC 2013]. We show a tight inapproximability result: under Gap-ETH there is no (2-{epsilon})-approximation algorithm parameterized by k (for any epsilon0). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of a W[1]-hard problem admitting a non-trivial parameterized approximation factor which is also known to be tight! Additionally we show that when restricting the input of SCSS to bidirected graphs, the problem remains NP-hard but becomes FPT for k.

Graphs with bounded highway dimension were introduced by Abraham et al. [ Proceedings of SODA 2010, pp. 782--793] as a model of transportation networks. We show that any such graph can be embedded into a distribution over bounded treewidth graphs with arbitrarily small distortion. More concretely, given a weighted graph $G=(V,E)$ of constant highway dimension, we show how to randomly compute a weighted graph $H=(V,E')$ that distorts shortest path distances of $G$ by at most a $1+\varepsilon$ factor in expectation, and whose treewidth is polylogarithmic in the aspect ratio of $G$. Our probabilistic embedding implies quasi-polynomial time approximation schemes for a number of optimization problems that naturally arise in transportation networks, including Travelling Salesman, Steiner Tree, and Facility Location. To construct our embedding for low highway dimension graphs we extend Talwar's [ Proceedings of STOC 2004, pp. 281--290] embedding of low doubling dimension metrics into bounded treewidth graphs, which generalizes known results for Euclidean metrics. We add several nontrivial ingredients to Talwar's techniques, and in particular thoroughly analyze the structure of low highway dimension graphs. Thus we demonstrate that the geometric toolkit used for Euclidean metrics extends beyond the class of low doubling metrics.

Given a directed graph $G$ and a list $(s_1,t_1),\dots,(s_d,t_d)$ of terminal pairs, the Directed Steiner Network problem asks for a minimum-cost subgraph of $G$ that contains a directed $s_i\to t_i$ path for every $1\le i \le k$. The special case Directed Steiner Tree (when we ask for paths from a root $r$ to terminals $t_1,\dots,t_d$) is known to be fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by the number of terminals, while the special case Strongly Connected Steiner Subgraph (when we ask for a path from every $t_i$ to every other $t_j$) is known to be W[1]-hard. We systematically explore the complexity landscape of directed Steiner problems to fully understand which other special cases are FPT or W[1]-hard. Formally, if $\mathcal{H}$ is a class of directed graphs, then we look at the special case of Directed Steiner Network where the list $(s_1,t_1),\dots,(s_d,t_d)$ of requests form a directed graph that is a member of $\mathcal{H}$. Our main result is a complete characterization of the classes $\mathcal{H}$ resulting in fixed-parameter tractable special cases: we show that if every pattern in $\mathcal{H}$ has the combinatorial property of being "transitively equivalent to a bounded-length caterpillar with a bounded number of extra edges," then the problem is FPT, and it is W[1]-hard for every recursively enumerable $\mathcal{H}$ not having this property. This complete dichotomy unifies and generalizes the known results showing that Directed Steiner Tree is FPT [Dreyfus and Wagner, Networks 1971], $q$-Root Steiner Tree is FPT for constant $q$ [Such\'y, WG 2016], Strongly Connected Steiner Subgraph is W[1]-hard [Guo et al., SIAM J. Discrete Math. 2011], and Directed Steiner Network is solvable in polynomial-time for constant number of terminals [Feldman and Ruhl, SIAM J. Comput. 2006], and moreover reveals a large continent of tractable cases that were not known before.

In a standard $f$-connectivity network design problem, we are given an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$, a cut-requirement function $f:2^V \rightarrow {\mathbb{N}}$, and non-negative costs $c(e)$ for all $e \in E$. We are then asked to find a minimum-cost vector $x \in {\mathbb{N}}^E$ such that $x(δ(S)) \geq f(S)$ for all $S \subseteq V$. We focus on the class of such problems where $f$ is a proper function. This encodes many well-studied NP-hard problems such as the generalized survivable network design problem. In this paper we present the first strongly polynomial time FPTAS for solving the LP relaxation of the standard IP formulation of the $f$-connectivity problem with general proper functions $f$. Implementing Jain's algorithm, this yields a strongly polynomial time $(2+ε)$-approximation for the generalized survivable network design problem (where we consider rounding up of rationals an arithmetic operation).

In the directed Steiner tree problem, we are given a digraph, nonnegative arc weights, a subset of vertices called terminals, and a special terminal called the root. The goal is to compute a minimum weight directed tree that connects each terminal to the root. We study the classical directed cut linear programming (LP) formulation which has a variable for every arc, and a constraint for every cut that separates a terminal from the root. For what instances is the directed cut LP integral? In this paper we demonstrate how the celebrated theorem of Lehman [Math. Program., 17 (1979), pp. 403--417] on minimally nonideal clutters provides a framework for deriving answers to this question. Specifically, we show that this framework yields short proofs of the optimum arborescences theorem and the integrality result for series-parallel digraphs. Furthermore, we use this framework to show that the directed cut linear program is integral for digraphs that are acyclic and have at most two nonterminal vertices.

The bottleneck of the currently best (ln(4) + epsilon)-approximation algorithm for the NP-hard Steiner tree problem is the solution of its large, so called hypergraphic, linear programming relaxation (HYP). Hypergraphic LPs are NP-hard to solve exactly, and it is a formidable computational task to even approximate them sufficiently well. We focus on another well-studied but poorly understood LP relaxation of the problem: the bidirected cut relaxation (BCR). This LP is compact, and can therefore be solved efficiently. Its integrality gap is known to be greater than 1.16, and while this is widely conjectured to be close to the real answer, only a (trivial) upper bound of 2 is known. In this paper, we give an efficient constructive proof that BCR and HYP are polyhedrally equivalent in instances that do not have an (edge-induced) claw on Steiner vertices, i.e., they do not contain a Steiner vertex with 3 Steiner neighbors. This implies faster ln(4)-approximations for these graphs, and is a significant step forward from the previously known equivalence for (so called quasi-bipartite) instances in which Steiner vertices form an independent set. We complement our results by showing that even restricting to instances where Steiner vertices induce one single star, determining whether the two relaxations are equivalent is NP-hard.

We study the k-BALANCED PARTITIONING problem in which the vertices of a graph are to be partitioned into k sets of size at most ceil(n/k) while minimising the cut size, which is the number of edges connecting vertices in different sets. The problem is well studied for general graphs, for which it cannot be approximated within any factor in polynomial time. However, little is known about restricted graph classes. We show that for trees k-BALANCED PARTITIONING remains surprisingly hard. In particular, approximating the cut size is APX-hard even if the maximum degree of the tree is constant. If instead the diameter of the tree is bounded by a constant, we show that it is NP-hard to approximate the cut size within n^c, for any constant c<1. In the face of the hardness results, we show that allowing near-balanced solutions, in which there are at most (1+eps)ceil(n/k) vertices in any of the k sets, admits a PTAS for trees. Remarkably, the computed cut size is no larger than that of an optimal balanced solution. In the final section of our paper, we harness results on embedding graph metrics into tree metrics to extend our PTAS for trees to general graphs. In addition to being conceptually simpler and easier to analyse, our scheme improves the best factor known on the cut size of near-balanced solutions from O(log^{1.5}(n)/eps^2) [Andreev and Räcke TCS 2006] to 0(log n), for weighted graphs. This also settles a question posed by Andreev and Räcke of whether an algorithm with approximation guarantees on the cut size independent from eps exists.

Abstract We consider the problem of computing ε ‐approximate Nash equilibria in network congestion games. The general problem is known to be PLS‐complete for every ε > 0, but the reductions are based on artificial and steep delay functions with the property that already two players using the same resource cause a delay that is significantly larger than the delay for a single player. We consider network congestion games with delay functions such as polynomials, exponential functions, and functions from queuing theory. We analyse which approximation guarantees can be achieved for such congestion games by the method of randomized rounding. Our results show that the success of this method depends on different criteria depending on the class of functions considered. For example, queuing theoretical functions admit good approximations if the equilibrium load of every resource is bounded away appropriately from its capacity. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. NETWORKS, Vol. 2011