Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jonathan A. Marshall

dblp:06/5601 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 5 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
3D vision · 80% Video understanding and tracking · 20%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene understanding
occlusion reasoning
0.011995
Learning to Predict Visibility and Invisibility from Occlusion Events · NIPS 1995
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene understanding › occlusion reasoning
visibility prediction
0.011995
Learning to Predict Visibility and Invisibility from Occlusion Events · NIPS 1995
Bioinformatics and computational biology
neuroscience
0.011992
Unsmearing Visual Motion: Development of Long-Range Horizontal Intrinsic Connections · NIPS 1992
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › sensory processing
visual motion processing
0.011992
Unsmearing Visual Motion: Development of Long-Range Horizontal Intrinsic Connections · NIPS 1992
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
motion analysis
0.021995
Learning to Predict Visibility and Invisibility from Occlusion Events · NIPS 1995
Unsmearing Visual Motion: Development of Long-Range Horizontal Intrinsic Connections · NIPS 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

developmental modeling · 0.0learning-based prediction · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Curved Trajectory Prediction Using a Self-Organizing Neural Network
abstract
Existing neural network models are capable of tracking linear trajectories of moving visual objects. This paper describes an additional neural mechanism, disfacilitation, that enhances the ability of a visual system to track curved trajectories. The added mechanism combines information about an object's trajectory with information about changes in the object's trajectory, to improve the estimates for the object's next probable location. Computational simulations are presented that show how the neural mechanism can learn to track the speed of objects and how the network operates to predict the trajectories of accelerating and decelerating objects.
Jonathan A. Marshall, Viswanath Srikanth
Int. J. Neural Syst.1
2000 Neural model of temporal and stochastic properties of binocular rivalry
George J. Kalarickal, Jonathan A. Marshall
Neurocomputing2
1995 Learning to Predict Visibility and Invisibility from Occlusion Events
Jonathan A. Marshall, Richard K. Alley, Robert S. Hubbard
NIPS1
1995 Adaptive perceptual pattern recognition by self-organizing neural networks: Context, uncertainty, multiplicity, and scale
Jonathan A. Marshall
Neural Networks1
1992 Unsmearing Visual Motion: Development of Long-Range Horizontal Intrinsic Connections
Kevin E. Martin, Jonathan A. Marshall
NIPS2
1990 A self-organizing scale-sensitive neural network
abstract
Three adaptive rules are combined in a neural network simulation: an anti-Hebbian inhibitory learning rule, a variant of a Hebbian excitatory learning rule, and a Weber law neuron-growth rule. The neuron-growth rule permits the network to learn and classify input patterns despite variations in their spatial scale. The inhibitory learning rule permits superposition of multiple simultaneous neural activations (multiple winners) under strictly regulated circumstances, instead of forcing winner-take-all pattern classifications. The selected multiple activations can represent uncertainty or multiplicity in perception and pattern recognition. Such behavior is useful in representing visual ambiguity in the aperture problem, determining visual depth from motion parallax, forming a category-recognition network in a complex environment, and representing visual transparency. The techniques illustrate how higher-level pattern sensitivities may self-organize in complex perceptual environments in the presence of multiple scales, multiple patterns, and uncertainty
Jonathan A. Marshall
IJCNN1
1990 Self-organizing neural networks for perception of visual motion
Jonathan A. Marshall
Neural Networks1
1989 Stereo boundary fusion by cortical complex cells: A system of maps, filters, and feedback networks for multiplexing distributed data
Stephen Grossberg, Jonathan A. Marshall
Neural Networks2