Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tilman Sauer

dblp:06/6205 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics
phylogenetic footprinting
0.112006
Evaluating phylogenetic footprinting for human-rodent comparisons · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
regulatory genomics
0.112006
Evaluating phylogenetic footprinting for human-rodent comparisons · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
transcription factor binding site prediction
0.112006
Evaluating phylogenetic footprinting for human-rodent comparisons · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology
comparative genomics
0.012006
Evaluating phylogenetic footprinting for human-rodent comparisons · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence alignment
0.012006
Evaluating phylogenetic footprinting for human-rodent comparisons · Bioinform. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequence homology search · 0.1gene annotation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Evaluating phylogenetic footprinting for human-rodent comparisons
abstract
MOTIVATION: 'Phylogenetic footprinting' is a widely applied approach to identify regulatory regions and potential transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) using alignments of non-coding orthologous regions from two or more organisms. A systematic evaluation of its validity and usability based on known TFBSs is needed to use phylogenetic footprinting most effectively in the identification of unknown TFBSs. RESULTS: In this paper we use 2678 human, mouse and rat TFBSs from the TRANSFAC database for this evaluation. To ensure the retrieval of correct orthologous sequences, we combine gene annotation and sequence homology searches. Demanding a sequence identity of at least 65% is most effective in discriminating TFBSs from non-functional sequence parts, while different alignment algorithms only have a minor influence on TFBS identification by human-rodent comparisons. With this threshold approximately 72% of the known TFBSs are found conserved, a number which varies significantly between different transcription factors and also depends on the function of the regulated gene. TFBSs for certain transcription factors do not require strict sequence conservation but instead may show a high pattern conservation, limiting somewhat the validity of purely sequence-based phylogenetic footprinting.
Tilman Sauer, Ekaterina Shelest, Edgar Wingender
Bioinform.1