EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Benjamin J. Stephens
dblp:06/6578
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 3 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Motion planning and robot control · 35% Reinforcement learning · 31% Robot navigation and mapping · 27% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
state estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | State estimation for force-controlled humanoid balance using simple models in the presence of modeling error · ICRA 2011 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › dynamic programming
approximate dynamic programming |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Random Sampling of States in Dynamic Programming · NIPS 2007 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value function approximation |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Random Sampling of States in Dynamic Programming · NIPS 2007 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
inverse kinematics |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Inverse Kinematics-based Motion Planning for Underactuated Systems · ICRA 2004 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Inverse Kinematics-based Motion Planning for Underactuated Systems · ICRA 2004 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
underactuated systems |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Inverse Kinematics-based Motion Planning for Underactuated Systems · ICRA 2004 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
humanoid robot |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | State estimation for force-controlled humanoid balance using simple models in the presence of modeling error · ICRA 2011 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Random Sampling of States in Dynamic Programming · NIPS 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linear inverted pendulum model · 0.1kalman filtering · 0.1random state sampling · 0.1local trajectory optimization · 0.1completeness analysis · 0.0closed-form inverse kinematics · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | State estimation for force-controlled humanoid balance using simple models in the presence of modeling errorabstractThis paper considers the design of state estimators for dynamic balancing systems using a Linear Inverted Pendulum model with unknown modeling errors such as a center of mass measurement offset or an external force. A variety of process and output models are constructed and compared. For a system containing modeling error, it is shown that a naive estimator (one that doesn't account for this error) will result in inaccurate state estimates. These state estimators are evaluated on a force-controlled humanoid robot for a sinusoidal swaying task and a forward push recovery task. Benjamin J. Stephens |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2010 | Dynamic Balance Force Control for compliant humanoid robotsabstractThis paper presents a model-based method, called Dynamic Balance Force Control (DBFC), for determining full body joint torques based on desired COM motion and contact forces for compliant humanoid robots. The center of mass (COM) dynamics are affected directly through contact force control to achieve stable balance. This idea is used to formulate DBFC considering the full rigid-body dynamics of the robot to produce desired contact forces. To achieve generic force control tasks, a virtual model controller, DBFC-VMC, is presented. Results presented from experiments on a force-controlled humanoid robot and simulation demonstrate the general purpose use of this control. Benjamin J. Stephens, Christopher G. Atkeson |
IROS | 1 |
| 2010 | Gain scheduled control of perturbed standing balanceabstractThis paper develops full-state parametric controllers for standing balance of humanoid robots in response to impulsive and constant pushes. We also explore a hypothesis that postural feedback gains in standing balance should change with perturbation size. From an engineering point of view this is known as gain scheduling. We use an optimization approach to see if feedback gains should scale with the perturbation for a simulated robot. We simulate models in the sagittal and lateral plane and in 3-dimensions, use a horizontal push of a given size, direction and location as a perturbation, and optimize parametric controllers for different push sizes, directions and locations. During a simulated perturbation experiment, the appropriate controller is continuously selected based on the current push. For an impulse, the simulated robot recovers back to the initial state; for a constant push, the robot moves to an equilibrium position which leans into the push and has zero joint torques. We show the performance of optimized parametric controllers in response to different external pushes. Dengpeng Xing, Christopher G. Atkeson, Jianbo Su, Benjamin J. Stephens |
IROS | 4 |
| 2008 | Random Sampling of States in Dynamic ProgrammingabstractWe combine three threads of research on approximate dynamic programming: sparse random sampling of states, value function and policy approximation using local models, and using local trajectory optimizers to globally optimize a policy and associated value function. Our focus is on finding steady-state policies for deterministic time-invariant discrete time control problems with continuous states and actions often found in robotics. In this paper, we describe our approach and provide initial results on several simulated robotics problems. Christopher G. Atkeson, Benjamin J. Stephens |
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B | 2 |
| 2007 | Integral control of humanoid balanceabstractThis paper presents a balance controller that allows a humanoid to recover from large disturbances and still maintain an upright posture. Balance is achieved by integral control, which decouples the dynamics and produces smooth torque signals. Simulation shows the controller performs better than other simple balance controllers. Because the controller is inspired by human balance strategies, we compare human motion capture and force plate data to simulation. A model tracking controller is also presented, making it possible to control complex robots using this simple control. Benjamin J. Stephens |
IROS | 1 |
| 2007 | Random Sampling of States in Dynamic ProgrammingabstractWe combine two threads of research on approximate dynamic programming: random sampling of states and using local trajectory optimizers to globally optimize a policy and associated value function. This combination allows us to replace a dense multidimensional grid with a much sparser adaptive sampling of states. Our focus is on finding steady state policies for the deterministic time invariant discrete time control problems with continuous states and actions often found in robotics. In this paper we show that we can now solve problems we couldn't solve previously with regular grid-based approaches. Christopher G. Atkeson, Benjamin J. Stephens |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2004 | Inverse Kinematics-based Motion Planning for Underactuated SystemsabstractWe study the problem of generating motion plans for kinematically controllable underactuated systems in environments cluttered with obstacles. We develop a computationally efficient motion planning algorithm that finds fast trajectories by exploiting closed-form inverse kinematics of the robot. The completeness property of the motion planning algorithm can be proven using appropriate metrics defined in the configuration space of the kinematically controllable systems. The snakeboard is used as an example of a kinematically controllable underactuated system to test the motion planning algorithm, and motion plans have been implemented on an experimental snakeboard. Prasun Choudhury, Benjamin J. Stephens, Kevin M. Lynch |
ICRA | 2 |