Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jean-Marc Verbavatz

dblp:07/10398 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
0000-0002-4654-1174ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 50% Image and video processing · 50%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing
image segmentation
0.112011
Tuner: Principled Parameter Finding for Image Segmentation Algorithms Using Visual Response Surface Exploration · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2011
Visualization and visual analytics › high-dimensional data visualization
parameter space exploration
0.112011
Tuner: Principled Parameter Finding for Image Segmentation Algorithms Using Visual Response Surface Exploration · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

uncertainty estimation · 0.2statistical model · 0.2sparse sampling · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Tuner: Principled Parameter Finding for Image Segmentation Algorithms Using Visual Response Surface Exploration
abstract
In this paper we address the difficult problem of parameter-finding in image segmentation. We replace a tedious manual process that is often based on guess-work and luck by a principled approach that systematically explores the parameter space. Our core idea is the following two-stage technique: We start with a sparse sampling of the parameter space and apply a statistical model to estimate the response of the segmentation algorithm. The statistical model incorporates a model of uncertainty of the estimation which we use in conjunction with the actual estimate in (visually) guiding the user towards areas that need refinement by placing additional sample points. In the second stage the user navigates through the parameter space in order to determine areas where the response value (goodness of segmentation) is high. In our exploration we rely on existing ground-truth images in order to evaluate the "goodness" of an image segmentation technique. We evaluate its usefulness by demonstrating this technique on two image segmentation algorithms: a three parameter model to detect microtubules in electron tomograms and an eight parameter model to identify functional regions in dynamic Positron Emission Tomography scans.
Thomas Torsney-Weir, Ahmed Saad, Torsten Möller, Hans-Christian Hege, Britta Weber, Jean-Marc Verbavatz, Steven Bergner
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.6