Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ao Yuan

dblp:07/1844 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-8558-5604ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational social science and digital humanities
public administration
0.212016
Batch Model for Batched Timestamps Data Analysis with Application to the SSA Disability Program · KDD 2016
Mathematical optimization › least squares
constrained least squares
0.212016
Batch Model for Batched Timestamps Data Analysis with Application to the SSA Disability Program · KDD 2016
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models
0.112016
Batch Model for Batched Timestamps Data Analysis with Application to the SSA Disability Program · KDD 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

randomization model · 1.5distribution analysis · 1.5batch search algorithm · 0.8constrained least squares · 0.5constrained least-squares · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Estimating Agreement by Chance for Sequence Annotation
abstract
In the field of natural language processing, correction of performance assessment for chance agreement plays a crucial role in evaluating the reliability of annotations.However, there is a notable dearth of research focusing on chance correction for assessing the reliability of sequence annotation tasks, despite their widespread prevalence in the field.To address this gap, this paper introduces a novel model for generating random annotations, which serves as the foundation for estimating chance agreement in sequence annotation tasks.Utilizing the proposed randomization model and a related comparison approach, we successfully derive the analytical form of the distribution, enabling the computation of the probable location of each annotated text segment and subsequent chance agreement estimation.Through a combination simulation and corpus-based evaluation, we successfully assess its applicability and validate its accuracy and efficacy.
Diya Li, Carolyn P. Rosé, Ao Yuan, Chunxiao Zhou
ACL (1)3
2017 Inductive identification of functional status information and establishing a gold standard corpus: A case study on the Mobility domain
abstract
The importance of functional status information (FSI) has become increasingly evident in recent years [1, 2]. However, implementation, application, and normalization of FSI in health care and Electronic Health Records (EHRs) have been largely underexplored. The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) [3] is considered to be the international standard for describing and coding function and health states. Nevertheless, the ICF provides only a limited vocabulary for recognizing FSI descriptions, since its purpose is to organize concepts related to functioning rather than to provide a comprehensive terminology or a complete set of relations between concepts. While the free text portion of EHRs might provide a more complete picture of health status, treatment, and progress, current Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods largely focus on extracting medical conditions (e.g. diagnoses and symptoms, etc.). The absence of a standardized functional terminology and incompleteness of the ICF as a vocabulary source makes it challenging to build a NLP system to extract FSI from EHR free text. Our work takes the first step towards extraction of FSI from free text by systematically identifying the structure of FSI related to Mobility, a key domain of the ICF and an important domain in the determination of work disability. Our interdisciplinary research group inductively evaluated examples extracted from over 1,200 Physical Therapy (PT) notes from the Clinical Center of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This extensive work resulted in a nested entity structure comprised of 2 entities, 3 sub-entities, 8 attributes, and 21 attribute values. Furthermore, we have manually curated the first gold standard corpus of 200 double-annotated and 50 triple-annotated PT notes. Our inter-annotator agreement (IAA) averages 97% F1-score on partial textual span matching and from 0.4 to 0.9 Siegel & Castellan's kappa on attribute value matching. Such a rich semantic corpus of Mobility FSI is valuable and a promising resource for future statistical learning. Our method is also adaptable to other domains of the ICF.
Thanh Thieu, Jonathan Camacho, Pei-Shu Ho, Julia Porcino, Lisa Nelson, Elizabeth Rasch, Chunxiao Zhou, Leighton Chan, Diane Brandt, Denis Newman-Griffis, Ao Yuan, Albert M. Lai
BIBM12
2016 Batch Model for Batched Timestamps Data Analysis with Application to the SSA Disability Program
abstract
The Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) is responsible for holding hearings, issuing decisions, and reviewing appeals as part of the Social Security Administration's disability determining process. In order to control and process cases, the ODAR has established a Case Processing and Management System (CPMS) to record management information since December 2003. The CPMS provides a detailed case status history for each case. Due to the large number of appeal requests and limited resources, the number of pending claims at ODAR was over one million cases by March 31, 2015. Our National Institutes of Health (NIH) team collaborated with SSA and developed a Case Status Change Model (CSCM) project to meet the ODAR's urgent need of reducing backlogs and improve hearings and appeals process. One of the key issues in our CSCM project is to estimate the expected service time and its variation for each case status code. The challenge is that the systems recorded job departure times may not be the true job finished times. As the CPMS timestamps data of case status codes showed apparent batch patterns, we proposed a batch model and applied the constrained least squares method to estimate the mean service times and the variances. We also proposed a batch search algorithm to determine the optimal batch partition, as no batch partition was given in the real data. Simulation studies were conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed methods. Finally, we applied the method to analyze a real CPMS data from ODAR/SSA.
Qingqi Yue, Ao Yuan, Xuan Che, Minh Huynh, Chunxiao Zhou
KDD2