EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mark T. Norris
dblp:07/1910
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 5Computer networks · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Empirical software engineering · 53% Software maintenance and evolution · 26% Requirements engineering and software design · 13% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Embedded and real-time systems · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering › software metrics
measurement validation |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Software product assessment · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1994 |
Empirical software engineering
software metrics |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Software product assessment · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1994 |
Requirements engineering and software design
formal specification |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Tools to Support Formal Methods · ICSE 1989 |
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time system design |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Tools for Real-Time System Design · ICSE 1988 |
Software testing
software reliability |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Software product assessment · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1994 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
source code measurement · 0.0COSMOS tool · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | Software product assessmentabstractEvery year, British Telecom's (BT's) level of investment in software is growing. Not only is the level of investment high, but there is a great deal of reliance on this software to retain BT's competitive edge against stiff competition. The software is, therefore, likely to be working in a commercially critical environment where the cost of failure is high both in terms of lost revenue and good will. Techniques are available, at various levels of maturity, which can help to provide added assurance against software failure. The first part of the paper relates specifically to the ESPRIT COSMOS project and work within BT on validating measures gathered using the COSMOS tool at the source code level. The second part of the paper describes how the results of this project fit within the wider context of software assessment, and outlines some of the techniques that are currently being used within BT or are being developed. The paper concludes with a brief description of what may be viable in the next few years.> D. J. Karkaria, Mark T. Norris, A. D. Pengelly |
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. | 2 |
| 1993 | Software process modelling and measurement: a QMS case study
A. D. Pengelly, Mark T. Norris, R. Higham |
Inf. Softw. Technol. | 2 |
| 1992 | An Exercise in Formalizing the Description of a Concurrent SystemabstractAbstract LOTOS is one of the most recent formal description languages to appear and one of very few with a standard definition. It has both a process algebra and an abstract data‐type component, and these facilities are used in combination to describe the behaviour of concurrent systems. The purpose of this paper is to examine, in a tutorial style, what is involved in constructing and taking benefit from such descriptions. The presentation is illustrated through the development of two formal descriptions for the children's game of pass‐the‐parcel. These descriptions and a concise summary of the main features of LOTOS are given as appendices. Many of the points made in the paper apply equally well to other process‐oriented languages such as CCS and CSP. David W. Bustard, Mark T. Norris, Rodney A. Orr, Adam C. Winstanley |
Softw. Pract. Exp. | 2 |
| 1989 | Tools to Support Formal MethodsabstractA key factor in the acceptance of high level programming languages has been the development of a comprehensive set of tools to support the user. If formal languages for specification are to achieve the same level of acceptance, they too will require extensive automated support. This paper describes a set of prototype tools which are designed to assist the developer in the use of fortnal specilication techniques. S. Patel, Rodney A. Orr, Mark T. Norris, David W. Bustard |
ICSE | 3 |
| 1988 | Graphical Views of Process-Orientated Specifications
David W. Bustard, Adam C. Winstanley, Mark T. Norris, Rodney A. Orr, S. Patel |
FORTE | 3 |
| 1988 | Tools for Real-Time System Design
Rodney A. Orr, Mark T. Norris, Richard Tinker, C. D. V. Rouch |
ICSE | 2 |