Davide Moschini

dblp:07/2502 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 95% Robot manipulation · 5%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › human-in-the-loop control
teleoperation control
0.122004
Performance of Robotic Teleoperation System with Flexible Slave Device · ICRA 2004
Performance Evaluation of Task Control in Teleoperation · ICRA 2004
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › teleoperation
bilateral teleoperation
0.012004
Performance Evaluation of Task Control in Teleoperation · ICRA 2004
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
force control
0.012004
Performance Evaluation of Task Control in Teleoperation · ICRA 2004
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
impedance control
0.012004
Performance Evaluation of Task Control in Teleoperation · ICRA 2004
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.012004
Performance of Robotic Teleoperation System with Flexible Slave Device · ICRA 2004
Robotics › Robot manipulation › flexible manipulator
flexible-link manipulator
0.012004
Performance of Robotic Teleoperation System with Flexible Slave Device · ICRA 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.1hybrid control · 0.0PID control · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Performance Evaluation of Task Control in Teleoperation
abstract
This paper presents theoretical and experimental results of robot interaction control schemes for a teleoperation system whose slave end effector comes in contact with a compliant surface. A salient feature of this work is a comparison of different control schemes implemented on a system whose slave consists of an industrial robot with an open software architecture and equipped with a wrist force sensor. Three control strategies are considered; one based on a single regulator PID giving a nominal performance, the second based on impedance control, and the last one based on a hybrid system approach. The performance of the various schemes is compared on a contact and puncturing task of an elastic membrane. The comparison is first carried out in simulation and then the simulations are validated with experiments. Quantitative as well as subjective performance measures are compared to assess the performance of the different control schemes.
Debora Botturi, Andrea Castellani, Davide Moschini, Paolo Fiorini
ICRA3
2004 Performance of Robotic Teleoperation System with Flexible Slave Device
abstract
This paper presents a comparison of four control strategies for a teleoperation system with a flexible link slave. In the classic literature, slave devices are considered only with rigid links whereas applications such as space robotics include flexible links. Thus, a more realistic model of a telemanipulator to compare and evaluate the performance of control architectures for teleoperation needs to be developed. The simulation is based on a one degree of freedom telemanipulation system available in our laboratory. Results indicate that position control modes could yield better performance than rate control when considering point-to-point tests.
Davide Moschini, Paolo Fiorini
ICRA1