Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Iuliu Vasilescu
dblp:07/2531
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-0947-7000ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Robot navigation and mapping · 50% Legged, aerial and field robots · 32% Motion planning and robot control · 18% | |
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Internet of things and sensor networks
underwater sensor networks |
0.1 | 2 | 2006 | Data Muling over Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks using an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle · ICRA 2006 Data collection, storage, and retrieval with an underwater sensor network · SenSys 2005 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Complete SE3 underwater robot control with arbitrary thruster configurations · ICRA 2010 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › underwater robotics
underwater vehicle control |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Complete SE3 underwater robot control with arbitrary thruster configurations · ICRA 2010 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
underwater robotics |
0.1 | 2 | 2010 | Autonomous Modular Optical Underwater Robot (AMOUR) Design, Prototype and Feasibility Study · ICRA 2005 Complete SE3 underwater robot control with arbitrary thruster configurations · ICRA 2010 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
localization |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Experiments with Underwater Robot Localization and Tracking · ICRA 2007 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sound source localization |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Experiments with Underwater Robot Localization and Tracking · ICRA 2007 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › GPS-denied localization
underwater localization |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Experiments with Underwater Robot Localization and Tracking · ICRA 2007 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation › vehicle navigation
underwater vehicle navigation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Data Muling over Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks using an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle · ICRA 2006 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › underwater sensor networks
underwater communication |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Data collection, storage, and retrieval with an underwater sensor network · SenSys 2005 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
visual odometry |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Experiments with Underwater Robot Localization and Tracking · ICRA 2007 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › underwater sensor networks › underwater communication
underwater optical-acoustic communication |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Data Muling over Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks using an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle · ICRA 2006 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › delay tolerant networks
data muling |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Data collection, storage, and retrieval with an underwater sensor network · SenSys 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
optical communication · 0.2acoustic communication · 0.2vision-based localization · 0.1least squares · 0.1SE3 control · 0.1stereo camera · 0.1scaled optical flow · 0.1acoustic ranging · 0.1optical ranging · 0.1modular design · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | I've Got 99 Problems But FLOPS Ain't OneabstractHyperscalers dominate the landscape of large network deployments, yet they rarely share data or insights about the challenges they face. In light of this supremacy, what problems can we find to solve in this space? We take an unconventional approach to find relevant research directions, starting from public plans to build a $100 billion datacenter for machine learning applications [53]. Leveraging the language models scaling laws, we discover what workloads such a datacenter might carry and explore the challenges one may encounter in doing so, with a focus on networking research. We conclude that building the datacenter and training such models is technically possible, but this requires novel wide-area transports for inter-DC communication, a multipath transport and novel datacenter topologies for intra-datacenter communication, high speed scale-up networks and transports, outlining a rich research agenda for the networking community. Alexandru M. Gherghescu, Vlad-Andrei Badoiu, Alexandru Agache, Mihai-Valentin Dumitru, Iuliu Vasilescu, Radu Mantu, Costin Raiciu |
HotNets | 5 |
| 2010 | Complete SE3 underwater robot control with arbitrary thruster configurationsabstractWe present a control algorithm for autonomous underwater robots with modular thruster configuration. The algorithm can handle arbitrary thruster configurations. It maintains the robot's desired attitude while solving for translational motion. The attitude can be arbitrarily chosen from the special orthogonal group SO3allowing the robot all possible orientations. The desired translational velocities can be chosen from R3allowing the robot to follow arbitrary trajectories underwater. If the robot is not fully holonomic then the controller chooses the closest possible solution using least squares and outputs the error vector. We verify the controller with experiments using our autonomous underwater robot AMOUR. We achieve roll errors of 1.0 degree (2.1 degrees standard deviation) and pitch errors of 1.5 degrees (1.8 degrees standard deviation). We also demonstrate experimentally that the controller can handle both nonholonomic and fully holonomic thruster configurations of the robot. In the later case we show how depth can be maintained while performing 360 degree rolls. Further, we demonstrate an input device that allows a user to control the robot's attitude while moving along a desired trajectory. Marek Doniec, Iuliu Vasilescu, Carrick Detweiler, Daniela Rus |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2010 | Using optical communication for remote underwater robot operationabstractUnderwater vehicles are typically operated using a tether or a slow acoustic link. We present an underwater optical communication system that enables a high-throughput and low-latency link to an underwater robot. The optical link allows the robot to operate in cluttered environments without the need for a tether. We demonstrate the performance of the system in a number of experiments which characterize the optical link and demonstrate remote control of the robot using a human input device. Marek Doniec, Carrick Detweiler, Iuliu Vasilescu, Daniela Rus |
IROS | 3 |
| 2007 | Experiments with Underwater Robot Localization and TrackingabstractThis paper describes a novel experiment in which two very different methods of underwater robot localization are compared. The first method is based on a geometric approach in which a mobile node moves within a field of static nodes, and all nodes are capable of estimating the range to their neighbours acoustically. The second method uses visual odometry, from stereo cameras, by integrating scaled optical flow. The fundamental algorithmic principles of each localization technique is described. We also present experimental results comparing acoustic localization with GPS for surface operation, and a comparison of acoustic and visual methods for underwater operation. Peter I. Corke, Carrick Detweiler, Matthew Dunbabin, Michael Hamilton 0001, Daniela Rus, Iuliu Vasilescu |
ICRA | 6 |
| 2006 | Data Muling over Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks using an Autonomous Underwater VehicleabstractWe present algorithms, systems, and experimental results for underwater data muling. In data muling a mobile agent interacts with static agents to upload, download, or transport data to a different physical location. We consider a system comprising an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) and many static underwater sensor nodes (USN) networked together optically and acoustically. The AUV can locate the static nodes using vision and hover above the static nodes for data upload. We describe the hardware and software architecture of this underwater system, as well as experimental data Matthew Dunbabin, Peter I. Corke, Iuliu Vasilescu, Daniela Rus |
ICRA | 3 |
| 2005 | Autonomous Modular Optical Underwater Robot (AMOUR) Design, Prototype and Feasibility StudyabstractWe propose a novel modular underwater robot which can self-reconfigure by stacking and unstacking its component modules. Applications for this robot include underwater monitoring, exploration, and surveillance. Our current prototype is a single module which contains several subsystems that later will be segregated into different modules. This robot functions as a testbed for the subsystems which are needed in the modular implementation. We describe the module design and discuss the propulsion, docking, and optical ranging subsystems in detail. Experimental results demonstrate depth control, linear motion, target module detection, and docking capabilities. Iuliu Vasilescu, Paulina Varshavskaya, Keith Kotay, Daniela Rus |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2005 | Data collection, storage, and retrieval with an underwater sensor networkabstractIn this paper we present a novel platform for underwater sensor networks to be used for long-term monitoring of coral reefs and fisheries. The sensor network consists of static and mobile underwater sensor nodes. The nodes communicate point-to-point using a novel high-speed optical communication system integrated into the TinyOS stack, and they broadcast using an acoustic protocol integrated in the TinyOS stack. The nodes have a variety of sensing capabilities, including cameras, water temperature, and pressure. The mobile nodes can locate and hover above the static nodes for data muling, and they can perform network maintenance functions such as deployment, relocation, and recovery. In this paper we describe the hardware and software architecture of this underwater sensor network. We then describe the optical and acoustic networking protocols and present experimental networking and data collected in a pool, in rivers, and in the ocean. Finally, we describe our experiments with mobility for data muling in this network. Iuliu Vasilescu, Keith Kotay, Daniela Rus, Matthew Dunbabin, Peter I. Corke |
SenSys | 1 |