Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jian Zhang 0049
dblp:07/314-49
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 25% Language models and text generation · 20% Efficient and distributed learning · 15% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 50% Parallel and multicore computing · 50% |
Topics — the 25 heaviest of 27, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text representation
contextualized word embeddings |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Contextual Embeddings: When Are They Worth It? · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › pre-trained language model
pre-trained language model representations |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Contextual Embeddings: When Are They Worth It? · ACL 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On the Downstream Performance of Compressed Word Embeddings · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word embedding |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On the Downstream Performance of Compressed Word Embeddings · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › embedding compression
word embedding compression |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On the Downstream Performance of Compressed Word Embeddings · NeurIPS 2019 |
Parallel and multicore computing
distributed deep learning training |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Deep learning at 15PF: supervised and semi-supervised classification for scientific data · SC 2017 |
High-performance computing
large-scale training |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Deep learning at 15PF: supervised and semi-supervised classification for scientific data · SC 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › machine reading comprehension
extractive question answering |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | SQuAD: 100, 000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text · EMNLP 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
machine reading comprehension |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | SQuAD: 100, 000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text · EMNLP 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › machine reading comprehension
reading comprehension datasets |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | SQuAD: 100, 000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text · EMNLP 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Higher-Order Inference for Multi-class Log-Supermodular Models · ICCV 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
graphical model inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Higher-Order Inference for Multi-class Log-Supermodular Models · ICCV 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
marginal inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Higher-Order Inference for Multi-class Log-Supermodular Models · ICCV 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Higher-Order Inference for Multi-class Log-Supermodular Models · ICCV 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Message Passing Inference for Large Scale Graphical Models with High Order Potentials · NIPS 2014 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › markov random field
higher order potential |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Message Passing Inference for Large Scale Graphical Models with High Order Potentials · NIPS 2014 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › message passing
message passing inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Message Passing Inference for Large Scale Graphical Models with High Order Potentials · NIPS 2014 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene understanding |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Estimating the 3D Layout of Indoor Scenes and Its Clutter from Depth Sensors · ICCV 2013 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene understanding
room layout estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Estimating the 3D Layout of Indoor Scenes and Its Clutter from Depth Sensors · ICCV 2013 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Contextual Embeddings: When Are They Worth It? · ACL 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | On the Downstream Performance of Compressed Word Embeddings · NeurIPS 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | SQuAD: 100, 000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text · EMNLP 2016 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation
multi-label segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Higher-Order Inference for Multi-class Log-Supermodular Models · ICCV 2015 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › range sensing
depth sensing |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Estimating the 3D Layout of Indoor Scenes and Its Clutter from Depth Sensors · ICCV 2013 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › range sensing › depth sensing
RGB-D |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Estimating the 3D Layout of Indoor Scenes and Its Clutter from Depth Sensors · ICCV 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
synchronous and asynchronous training · 0.6semi-supervised learning · 0.6convolutional neural network · 0.6probing · 0.4benchmark evaluation · 0.4uniform quantization · 0.4eigenspace overlap score · 0.4logistic regression · 0.2dependency parsing · 0.2constituency parsing · 0.2partition function bound · 0.2log-supermodular model · 0.2convex optimization · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Contextual Embeddings: When Are They Worth It?abstractWe study the settings for which deep contextual embeddings (e.g., BERT) give large improvements in performance relative to classic pretrained embeddings (e.g., GloVe), and an even simpler baseline-random word embeddings-focusing on the impact of the training set size and the linguistic properties of the task.Surprisingly, we find that both of these simpler baselines can match contextual embeddings on industry-scale data, and often perform within 5 to 10% accuracy (absolute) on benchmark tasks.Furthermore, we identify properties of data for which contextual embeddings give particularly large gains: language containing complex structure, ambiguous word usage, and words unseen in training. Simran Arora, Avner May, Jian Zhang 0049, Christopher Ré |
ACL | 3 |
| 2019 | Low-Precision Random Fourier Features for Memory-constrained Kernel ApproximationabstractWe investigate how to train kernel approximation methods that generalize well under a memory budget. Building on recent theoretical work, we define a measure of kernel approximation error which we find to be more predictive of the empirical generalization performance of kernel approximation methods than conventional metrics. An important consequence of this definition is that a kernel approximation matrix must be high rank to attain close approximation. Because storing a high-rank approximation is memory intensive, we propose using a low-precision quantization of random Fourier features (LP-RFFs) to build a high-rank approximation under a memory budget. Theoretically, we show quantization has a negligible effect on generalization performance in important settings. Empirically, we demonstrate across four benchmark datasets that LP-RFFs can match the performance of full-precision RFFs and the Nyström method, with 3x-10x and 50x-460x less memory, respectively. Jian Zhang 0049, Avner May, Tri Dao, Christopher Ré |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2019 | On the Downstream Performance of Compressed Word EmbeddingsabstractCompressing word embeddings is important for deploying NLP models in memory-constrained settings. However, understanding what makes compressed embeddings perform well on downstream tasks is challenging---existing measures of compression quality often fail to distinguish between embeddings that perform well and those that do not. We thus propose the eigenspace overlap score as a new measure. We relate the eigenspace overlap score to downstream performance by developing generalization bounds for the compressed embeddings in terms of this score, in the context of linear and logistic regression. We then show that we can lower bound the eigenspace overlap score for a simple uniform quantization compression method, helping to explain the strong empirical performance of this method. Finally, we show that by using the eigenspace overlap score as a selection criterion between embeddings drawn from a representative set we compressed, we can efficiently identify the better performing embedding with up to 2x lower selection error rates than the next best measure of compression quality, and avoid the cost of training a separate model for each task of interest. Avner May, Jian Zhang 0049, Tri Dao, Christopher Ré |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2017 | Deep learning at 15PF: supervised and semi-supervised classification for scientific dataabstractThis paper presents the first, 15-PetaFLOP Deep Learning system for solving scientific pattern classification problems on contemporary HPC architectures. We develop supervised convolutional architectures for discriminating signals in high-energy physics data as well as semi-supervised architectures for localizing and classifying extreme weather in climate data. Our Intelcaffe-based implementation obtains ~2TFLOP/s on a single Cori Phase-II Xeon-Phi node. We use a hybrid strategy employing synchronous node-groups, while using asynchronous communication across groups. We use this strategy to scale training of a single model to ~9600 Xeon-Phi nodes; obtaining peak performance of 11.73-15.07 PFLOP/s and sustained performance of 11.41-13.27 PFLOP/s. At scale, our HEP architecture produces state-of-the-art classification accuracy on a dataset with 10M images, exceeding that achieved by selections on high-level physics-motivated features. Our semi-supervised architecture successfully extracts weather patterns in a 15TB climate dataset. Our results demonstrate that Deep Learning can be optimized and scaled effectively on many-core, HPC systems. Thorsten Kurth, Jian Zhang 0049, Nadathur Satish, Evan Racah, Ioannis Mitliagkas, Md. Mostofa Ali Patwary, Tareq M. Malas, Narayanan Sundaram, Wahid Bhimji, Mikhail Smorkalov, Jack Deslippe, Mikhail Shiryaev, Srinivas Sridharan 0002, Prabhat, Pradeep Dubey |
SC | 2 |
| 2016 | SQuAD: 100, 000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of TextabstractWe present the Stanford Question Answering Dataset (SQuAD), a new reading comprehension dataset consisting of 100,000+ questions posed by crowdworkers on a set of Wikipedia articles, where the answer to each question is a segment of text from the corresponding reading passage. We analyze the dataset to understand the types of reasoning required to answer the questions, leaning heavily on dependency and constituency trees. We build a strong logistic regression model, which achieves an F1 score of 51.0%, a significant improvement over a simple baseline (20%). However, human performance (86.8%) is much higher, indicating that the dataset presents a good challenge problem for future research. The dataset is freely available at https://stanford-qa.com Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang 0049, Konstantin Lopyrev, Percy Liang |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2015 | Higher-Order Inference for Multi-class Log-Supermodular ModelsabstractHigher-order models have been shown to be very useful for a plethora of computer vision tasks. However, existing techniques have focused mainly on MAP inference. In this paper, we present the first efficient approach towards approximate Bayesian marginal inference in a general class of high-order, multi-label attractive models, where previous techniques slow down exponentially with the order (clique size). We formalize this task as performing inference in log-supermodular models under partition constraints, and present an efficient variational inference technique. The resulting optimization problems are convex and yield bounds on the partition function. We also obtain a fully factorized approximation to the posterior, which can be used in lieu of the true complicated distribution. We empirically demonstrate the performance of our approach by comparing it to traditional inference methods on a challenging high-fidelity multi-label image segmentation dataset. We obtain state-of-the-art classification accuracy for MAP inference, and substantially improved ROC curves using the approximate marginals. Jian Zhang 0049, Josip Djolonga, Andreas Krause 0001 |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2014 | Message Passing Inference for Large Scale Graphical Models with High Order Potentials
Jian Zhang 0049, Alexander G. Schwing, Raquel Urtasun |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2013 | Estimating the 3D Layout of Indoor Scenes and Its Clutter from Depth SensorsabstractIn this paper we propose an approach to jointly estimate the layout of rooms as well as the clutter present in the scene using RGB-D data. Towards this goal, we propose an effective model that is able to exploit both depth and appearance features, which are complementary. Furthermore, our approach is efficient as we exploit the inherent decomposition of additive potentials. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on the challenging NYU v2 dataset and show that employing depth reduces the layout error by 6% and the clutter estimation by 13%. Jian Zhang 0049, Chen Kan, Alexander G. Schwing, Raquel Urtasun |
ICCV | 1 |